Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant     þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant     o
Check the appropriate box:
o    Preliminary

Proxy Statement

o    Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ    Definitive Proxy Statement
o    Definitive Additional Materials
o    Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Newfield Exploration Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þFiled by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o		No fee required.

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12


Newfield Exploration Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) 
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


(2) 
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


(3) 
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


(4) 
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


(5) 
(5)Total fee paid:



o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:


(2) 
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:


(3) Filing Party:


(4) Date Filed:

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

2016 Proxy Statement

Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be Held on May 17, 2016

Table of Contents





    
 
GRAPHIC
4 Waterway Square Place
Suite 100

The Woodlands, TX 77380



GRAPHIC
“The
"2015 was a good year 2014 was significant for Newfield and its stockholders as we continued a multi-year streak of solid execution against our stockholders. We had exemplary performance across the Companytargets and delivered on our key objectives to reduce operating costs and grow production, proved reserves and cash flow.objectives. The market notedtook note as our accomplishmentsshare price increased 20% over 2014 and in 2014, ourwe were ranked as the top E&P stock was a top performer in the ES&P sector. We enter 2015 with momentum, a deep inventory of economic drilling opportunities500 Index. Although these are challenging times for our industry, we have taken timely and a soundaggressive steps to adapt our near-term business strategy that willstrategies to ensure we continuemaintain liquidity and preserve our balance sheet. Early in 2016, we issued 34.5 million shares of common stock and raised an estimated $775 million in net proceeds. This issuance ensures we will have the financial foundation to create long-term value forexecute our stockholders.”
near-term business plan. I am confident that we have the right plan, people and assets in place to prosper and succeed when oil prices eventually stabilize and recover."

-Lee K. Boothby

Dear Stockholders:

I am pleased to invite you to join our Board of Directors, senior leadership and other associates and stockholders for our 20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held on May 15, 2015, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time.Daylight Time on May 17, 2016. We will again this year provide an opportunity for all stockholders, regardless of location, to attend our 20152016 Annual Meeting. Specifically, we will hold a virtual meeting and you will be able to attend the 20152016 Annual Meeting, vote and submit any questions during the meeting via live webcast through the linkwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015NFX2016. You will need the 12-digit control number included with these proxy materials to vote atduring the Annual Meeting, but we urge you to vote before the meeting. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted atduring the meeting. As in years past, we will have a brief management presentation following the official business portion of the meeting.

We are mailing to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice). We believe the Notice process allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they desire in a timely manner, while saving costs and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our 20142015 Annual Report, 20152016 Proxy Statement and proxy card over the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request a paper copy of the materials, if desired. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice should receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

Your vote is very important to us. We encourage you to sign and return your proxy card and/or vote through theby telephone or Internet following the instructions on the Notice as soon as possible, so that your shares will be represented and voted at the meeting. Instructions on how to vote are on page 5.

four.

I hope you are able to attendjoin the virtual meeting. Thank you for being a stockholder and for the trust you have in our Company.

Very truly yours,
LEE K. BOOTHBY
                        Sincerely,



GRAPHIC



LEE K. BOOTHBY



Chairman of the Board, President
and
Chief Executive Officer
CEO

Table of Contents




GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
4 Waterway Square Place Suite 100

The Woodlands, TexasTX 77380
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Friday, May 15, 2015
8:00 a.m. Central Time via live webcast

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
May 17, 2016
8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time via live webcast

The 20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Newfield Exploration Company (the "Annual Meeting") will be held at 8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Friday, May 15, 2015,17, 2016, via live webcast through the linkwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015NFX2016 for the following purposes:

1.To elect a Board of Directors for the coming year;
2.To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2015;
3.To hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;
4.To approve the Second Amended and Restated 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan to increase the authorized shares under the plan by 7,000,000;
5.To approve material terms of the performance metrics set forth in our Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan for tax compliance (Proposal 5A) and to approve material terms of the performance metrics set forth in our 2011 Annual Incentive Plan for tax compliance (Proposal 5B);
6.To approve an amendment to the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase authorized shares of common stock from 200,000,000 to 300,000,000 shares (Proposal 6A) and to increase authorized shares of preferred stock from 5,000,000 to 7,500,000 shares (Proposal 6B); and
7.To transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

    1.
    To elect a Board of Directors for the coming year;

    2.
    To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2016;

    3.
    To hold an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers; and

    4.
    To transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

The close of business on March 16, 201521, 2016 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. This Notice, Proxy Statement and the form of proxy/voting instruction card are first being sent or made available to stockholders on or about April 2, 2015.

March 25, 2016.

 By order of the Board of Directors,

 


GRAPHIC

            		JOHN

TIMOTHY D. MARZIOTTIYANG

March 31, 201524, 2016

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Table of Contents

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT


You may vote by Internet or by telephone using the instructions on the Notice, or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy card, by signing and returning it in the envelope provided. You will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card (if applicable) to vote at the meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken by following the instructions in this Proxy Statement. You may also attend and vote atduring the Annual Meeting.

Meeting via our virtual meeting.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2016

The notice of the 20152016 Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement and our 20142015 Annual Report and 10-K Wrap are available at:

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=63798&p=proxywww.proxyvote.com




TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CEO Letter
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
Proxy Voting Summary
2
Questions and Answers About the Meeting
3
Forward-Looking Statements
7
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
7
General
7
Board of Directors
7
Audit Committee
11
Compensation & Management Development Committee
11
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
12
Operations & Reserves Committee
14
Interests of Management and Others in Certain Transactions
14
NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
15
Director Compensation Program
15
Annual Cash Fees and Restricted Stock Award
16
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
16
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
25
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
25
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
26
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
26
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
26
Summary Compensation Table
41
Grants of Plan-Based Equity Awards in 2014
43
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2014
44
Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested in 2014
46
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
46
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
47
COMPENSATION & MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
51
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
52
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
52
PROPOSAL 3: NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
53
PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY 2011 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
53
PROPOSALS 5A and 5B: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED 2011 STOCK PLAN AND 2011 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR TAX COMPLIANCE
64
Consideration and Approval of Material Terms of the Performance Goals for Performance Awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan (Proposal 5A)
64
Consideration and Approval of Material Terms of the Performance Goals and Metrics under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan (Proposal 5B)
66

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement i


Page
PROPOSALS 6A and 6B: AMENDMENTS TO THIRD RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK
67
Amendment to Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase Authorized Shares of Common Stock (Proposal 6A)
67
Amendment to Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase Authorized Shares of Preferred Stock (Proposal 6B)
69
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
71
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
73
OTHER INFORMATION
73
Other Business
73
Proxy Solicitation
73
Stockholder Proposals for 2016 Annual Meeting and Director Nominations
73
Additional Information Available
73
APPENDIX A - Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
APPENDIX B - Second Amended and Restated 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OUR AFFAIRS SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement ii

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
4 Waterway Square Place
Suite 100
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
(281) 210-5100
www.newfield.com
PROXY STATEMENT
For the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
We are furnishing you this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (Board) to be voted at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) of Newfield Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation, sometimes referred to as the Company, Newfield, our, us or we. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually on Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:00 a.m., Central Time via live webcast through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015. You will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card (if applicable) to vote. The proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement, proxy card or voting instructions and our 2014 Annual Report and 10-K Wrap are being distributed and made available on or about April 2, 2015.
In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice) will be mailed to most of our stockholders on or about April 2, 2015. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials to be sent to them by following the instructions in the Notice.
The Notice also provides instructions on how to inform us to send future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.
Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timelier manner, save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and conserve natural resources.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 1

  PROXY VOTING SUMMARY 
 This voting summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. 
 Annual Meeting of Stockholders 
 Time and Date:Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. Central Time 
 Place: 
Via live webcast through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015
 
 Record Date:March 16, 2015 
 Voting: Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. 
   
: Vote by Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com
 
   
( Vote by telephone at 1-800-690-6903
 
   
- Vote by completing and returning your proxy card or voter instruction card
 
   
Vote during the meeting via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015. You will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card.
 
   We urge you to vote before the meeting. 
 
Voting Matters
Agenda Item
Board Vote
Recommendation
Page Reference 
 1.
Election of Directors
Each director nominee has an established record of accomplishment in areas relevant to overseeing the Company's business and possesses qualifications and characteristics that are essential to a well-functioning and deliberative governing body.
FOR each Director Nominee
16
 
 2.
Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company's Independent Auditor
As a matter of good corporate governance, the Board of Directors (Board) is asking stockholders to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company's Independent Auditor for fiscal 2015.
FOR
26
 
 3.
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
The Board is asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. In 2014, stockholders expressed support for the Company's executive compensation program. The Compensation & Management Development Committee continued to refine the Company's compensation process and program during 2014, authorizing more transparent compensation targets for executives and working with the Board's Operations and Reserves Committee to determine the Company's 2014 performance metric targets.
FOR
53
 
 4.
Consideration and Approval of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
The Board is seeking approval of the Second Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan (Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan), which provides for an increase in shares of common stock authorized under the plan by 7,000,000 shares (approximately 4.3% of the outstanding shares of the Company as of March 16, 2015).
FOR
53
 
 5A and 5B.
Consideration and Approval of Material Terms of Performance Metrics for Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and 2011 Annual Incentive Plan for Tax Compliance
To ensure compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, stockholders are asked to approve the performance metrics for the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan (Proposal 5A) and the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan (Proposal 5B).
FOR
64
 
 6A and 6B.
Consideration and Approval of Amendment to Company's Charter to Increase Authorized Shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock
The Board has unanimously approved amendments to the Company's Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Charter) to increase authorized shares of common stock to 300,000,000 shares (Proposal 6A) and increase authorized shares of preferred stock to 7,500,000 shares (Proposal 6B). The Board has determined that the increases are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and has directed that the Charter amendments be submitted to the stockholders for approval.
FOR
67
 

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 2

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2015, the record date for the meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The record date is established by our Board as required by Delaware law. Stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote their shares at the meeting. Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock that they owned as of the record date. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of directors. On the record date, we had 162,697,001 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
What non-routine matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
The election of directors, the advisory vote on our executive compensation, the approval of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the approval of material terms of the performance metrics under our Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, the amendments to the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase authorized shares of common stock and to increase shares of preferred stock are each non-routine matters on which brokers are not allowed to vote unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. Brokers not receiving voting instructions will only be allowed to vote on the ratification of our appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company's independent auditor for fiscal 2015.
What is a proxy?
A proxy is your legal designation of another person, called a proxy holder, to vote the shares that you own. If you designate someone as your proxy holder in a written document, that document is called a proxy. We have designated Lawrence S. Massaro, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, John D. Marziotti, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and George W. Fairchild, Jr., Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary, to act as proxy holders at the Annual Meeting as to all shares for which proxies are returned or voting instructions are provided by Internet or telephonic voting.
What is the effect of an “advisory” vote?
Because your votes with respect to the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers and the approval of our NEO compensation are advisory, they will not be binding upon the Board or its Committees. However, our Compensation & Management Development Committee and the Audit Committee will take the outcome of the advisory votes into account when considering future executive compensation arrangements of our NEOs and the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company’s independent auditor, respectively.
What is a Proxy Statement?
A Proxy Statement is a document that SEC regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy card designating the proxy holders described above to vote on your behalf.
What is a “broker non-vote”?
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) permits brokers to vote their customers’ stock held in street name on routine matters when the brokers have not received voting instructions from their customers. The NYSE does not, however, allow brokers to vote their customers’ stock held in street name on non-routine matters unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. In such cases, the uninstructed shares for which the broker is unable to vote are called “broker non-votes”. For purposes of determining the outcome of any proposal as to which the broker has physically indicated on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote, if allowed, these shares will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with respect to that proposal, even though those shares are considered entitled to vote for quorum purposes and may be entitled to vote on other proposals.
Where and when is the Annual Meeting?
The Annual Meeting will be held on Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:00 a.m. Central Time. This year, we will again have a virtual meeting, which you may attend online through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015. To access the meeting, you will only need to go to the link and sign on. If you would like to vote or participate during the meeting, you will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice or your proxy card.
What routine matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
The ratification of the independent auditor is a routine matter on which brokers may vote in their discretion on behalf of customers who have not provided voting instructions.
Who will tabulate and certify the vote?
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., an independent third party, will tabulate and certify the vote, and will have a representative to act as the independent inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting.
If I vote by telephone or Internet and received a proxy card in the mail, do I need to return my proxy card?
No.
Who is soliciting my vote?
Our Board is soliciting your vote for the Annual Meeting.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 3

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
We will announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and disclose the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the date of the Annual Meeting unless only preliminary voting results are available at that time. To the extent necessary, we will file an amended Current Report on Form 8-K to disclose the final voting results within four business days after the final voting results are known. You may access or obtain a copy of these and other reports free of charge on the Company’s website at http://www.newfield.com, or by contacting our investor relations department at 281-210-5321. Also, the Form 8-K, any amendments thereto and other reports filed by the Company with the SEC are available to you over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
How can I view the stockholder list?
A complete list of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for viewing during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days before the Annual Meeting at our offices at 4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77380. The list of stockholders will also be available for stockholders during the Annual Meeting through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015.
Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
We are not aware of any matters that will be considered at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other matters arise at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in your proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment.
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting and what vote is required to approve each proposal?
The Annual Meeting is held to vote on the following proposals and to transact any business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
PROPOSALVOTING STANDARD
1. Election of Directors.ÖA director will be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director, meaning if the number of shares voted "for" that director exceeds the number of votes "against" that director. Abstentions will have no effect in determining whether the proposal is approved.
2. To ratify the appointment of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.ÖAn affirmative vote requires the majority of votes cast on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect in determining whether the proposal is approved.
3. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.
4. To approve the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan to increase the authorized shares under the plan by 7,000,000.
5A. To ensure compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, stockholders are asked to approve material terms of the performance goals for performance awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.
5B. To ensure compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, stockholders are asked to approve material terms of the performance goals and metrics under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan.
6A. To approve the amendment of our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase authorized shares of common stock to 300,000,000.ÖAn affirmative vote requires the majority of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote "against" the proposal.
6B. To approve the amendment of our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase authorized shares of preferred stock to 7,500,000.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 4

How do I vote?
You may vote by any of the following four methods (Please vote as soon as possible):
: Internet. Vote at http://www.proxyvote.com, the website for Internet voting. Simply follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card by mail, follow the instructions on the proxy card and you can confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 14, 2015.
( Telephone. Vote by telephone (1-800-690-6903) and follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card, by following the instructions on the proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your stock and confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. Telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 14, 2015.
- Mail. If you received a proxy card by mail, vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote by mail and your proxy card is returned unsigned, then your vote cannot be counted. If you vote by mail and the returned proxy card is signed without indicating how you want to vote, then your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board. If mailed, your completed and signed proxy card must be received by May 14, 2015.
8 Meeting.    You may vote at the Annual Meeting online through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015. The 12-digit Control Number provided on your Notice or proxy card is necessary to vote. However, we urge you to vote prior to the meeting.
If you hold your Newfield shares in a brokerage account, your ability to vote over the Internet or by telephone depends on your broker’s voting process. Please follow the directions on your proxy card or the voter instruction card from your broker carefully. If your Newfield shares are held in the 401(k) Plan, then your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 13, 2015. The plan administrator will direct the trustee to vote shares as to which no instructions are received in proportion to voting directions received by the trustee from all plan participants who vote.
The Board recommends that you vote using one of the first three methods discussed above, as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. Using one of the first three methods discussed above to vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you later decide to change your vote while attending the Annual Meeting.
Can I change my vote?
Yes. You may revoke or change a proxy before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting by:
¯ giving notice of the revocation in writing to our Corporate Secretary at 4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77380;
¯ submitting another valid proxy by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and if mailed, is properly signed, or if submitted by telephone or over the Internet, is received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May14, 2015;
¯ voting at the Annual Meeting through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015, for which you will need the 12-digit control number included with these proxy materials to vote at the Annual Meeting; or
¯ if you have instructed your broker or other nominee to vote your shares, by following the directions received from your broker or nominee to change those instructions.
If your shares are held in our 401(k) Plan, you also may revoke or change your proxy by submitting another valid proxy by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and, if mailed, is properly signed. The new 401(k) Plan participant proxy must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 13, 2015.
Who pays for the proxy solicitation related to the Annual Meeting?
We will bear the entire cost of this solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, the mailing of the Notice and any mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy, and any additional information furnished to stockholders. In addition to using the mail, proxies may be solicited by directors, executive officers, and other employees of Newfield, in person or by telephone. No additional compensation will be paid to our directors, executive officers, or other employees for these services. You also may be solicited by means of press releases issued by Newfield, postings on our website at http://www.newfield.com, or other media forms. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist us with the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of approximately $7,500, plus expenses. Georgeson ensures that brokers, custodians and nominees will supply additional copies of the proxy materials for distribution to the beneficial owners. We also will reimburse banks, nominees, fiduciaries, brokers and other custodians for their costs of sending the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock.
What constitutes a quorum?
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Under Delaware law, abstentions are treated as present and entitled to vote and thus, will be counted in determining whether a quorum is present. In addition, broker non-votes (described above) will be considered present for quorum purposes but not considered entitled to vote on that matter.
What is the difference between a “stockholder of record” and a stockholder who holds stock in “street name”, also called a “beneficial owner”?
If your shares are registered in your name at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are a “stockholder of record”. If your shares are registered at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC in the name of a broker, bank, trustee, nominee, or other similar stockholder of record, your shares are held in “street name” and you are the “beneficial owner” of the shares.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 5

Can I vote my stock by filling out and returning the Notice?
No. The Notice will, however, provide instructions on how to vote by Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card, or by submitting a ballot electronically during the Annual Meeting.
What is householding?
We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC known as “householding”. Under this procedure, multiple stockholders residing at the same address have the convenience of receiving a single copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, unless they have notified us that they want to continue receiving multiple copies. Householding allows us to reduce the environmental impact of providing proxy materials as well as printing and mailing costs.
If you received a householded mailing this year and you would like to have additional copies of the Annual Report, Proxy Statement and/or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials mailed to you, or you would like to revoke your consent to the householding of documents, please submit your request to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. either by calling 1-800-542-1061 or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Broadridge or Newfield will promptly deliver any additional copies requested. If you revoke your consent, you will begin to receive individual copies of future mailings within 30 days after we receive your revocation notice.
Unfortunately, householding for bank and brokerage accounts is limited to accounts within the same bank or brokerage firm. For example, if you and your spouse each have two accounts containing our common stock at two different brokerage firms, your household will receive two copies of our Annual Meeting materials – one from each brokerage firm. To reduce the number of duplicate sets of materials your household receives, you may wish to enroll some or all of your accounts in our electronic delivery program. See “Why didn’t I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?”
Alternatively, if you have previously revoked your consent to the householding of documents and would now like to receive a single copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you may submit such request to Broadridge as indicated above.
How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?
Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet. Our proxy materials are also available on our website at:
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=63798&p=proxy
Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we have sent to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.
Why didn’t I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?
We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to help reduce the costs we incur in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or using the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 6

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the amounts set forth in this Proxy Statement in the disclosure regarding executive compensation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These amounts include estimates of future amounts payable under awards, plans and agreements or the present value of future amounts, as well as the estimated value at December 31, 20142015 of awards the vesting of which will depend on performance over future periods. Estimating future payments of this nature is necessarily subject to contingencies and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict. In order to estimate amounts that may be paid in the future, we had to make assumptions as to a number of variables, which may, and in many cases will, differ from future actual conditions. These variables include the price of our common stock, the date of termination of employment, final pay, interest rates, applicable tax rates and other assumptions. Accordingly, amounts and awards paid out in future periods may vary from the related estimates and values set forth in this Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2016
​ ​​
Forward-Looking Statements

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

2
​ ​​
Annual Meeting of Stockholders2
Questions and Answers About the Meeting3

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

7
​ ​​
Corporate Governance Guidelines7
Director Selection Process and Guidelines7
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Financial Code of Ethics and Insider Trading Policy7
Board of Directors7
Audit Committee11
Compensation & Management Development Committee12
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee13
Operations & Reserves Committee16
Related Person Transactions16
Corporate Governance Documents17

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

18
​ ​​
Board Recommendation22

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

23
​​​
Director Compensation Program23
Director Compensation Table24

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION25
​ ​​

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

66
​ ​​
Board Recommendation66

PROPOSAL 3: NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

67
​ ​​
Board Recommendation68

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

69
​ ​​

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

70
​ ​​

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

71
​ ​​

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

72
​ ​​

OTHER INFORMATION

72
​ ​​
Other Business72
Proxy Solicitation72
Stockholder List72
Stockholder Proposals for 2017 Annual Meeting and Director Nominations73
Additional Information Available73

APPENDIX A

A-1
​ ​​

NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OUR AFFAIRS SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        iii

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
(281) 210-5100
www.newfield.com

PROXY STATEMENT
For the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

We are furnishing you this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (Board) to be voted at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) of Newfield Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation, sometimes referred to as the Company, Newfield, our, us or we. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually at 8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Tuesday, May 17, 2016 via live webcast through the linkwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016. You will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card (if applicable) to vote. The proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement, proxy card or voting instructions and our 2015 Annual Report and 10-K are being distributed and made available on or about March 25, 2016.

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice) will be mailed to most of our stockholders on or about March 25, 2016. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials to be sent to them by following the instructions in the Notice.

The Notice also provides instructions on how to inform us to send future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timelier manner, save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and conserve natural resources.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        1

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This proxy statement summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

​  

Time and Date:

8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Tuesday, May 17, 2016

​
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​



Place:

Via live webcast through the link
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016

​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​

​  

Record Date:

March 21, 2016

​
​​​ ​​ ​​​​



Voting:

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote.





GRAPHIC


GRAPHIC


GRAPHIC




Vote by Internet athttp://www.proxyvote.com

Vote by telephone at 1-800-690-6903

Vote by completing and returning your proxy card or voter instruction card




Vote during the meeting via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016. You will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card.




We urge you to vote before the meeting.

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Voting Matters

LOGO

​

2        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING

Where and when is the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held at 8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time on Tuesday, May 17, 2016. This year, we will again have a virtual meeting, which you may attend online through the linkwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016. To access the meeting, you will only need to go to the link and sign on. If you would like to vote or participate during the meeting, you will need the 12-digit control number provided on the Notice or your proxy card.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2016, the record date for the meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The record date is established by our Board as required by Delaware law. Stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote their shares at the meeting. Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock that they owned as of the record date. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of directors. On the record date, we had 198,137,564 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is a proxy?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person, called a proxy holder, to vote the shares that you own. If you designate someone as your proxy holder in a written document, that document is called a proxy. We have designated Lawrence S. Massaro, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Timothy D. Yang, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and Benjamin J. Paul, Senior Legal Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary, to act as proxy holders at the Annual Meeting as to all shares for which proxies are returned or voting instructions are provided by Internet or telephonic voting.

What is the effect of an "advisory" vote?

Because your votes with respect to the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers and the approval of our NEO compensation are advisory, they will not be binding upon the Board or its Committees. However, our Compensation & Management Development

Committee and the Audit Committee will take the outcome of the advisory votes into account when considering future executive compensation arrangements of our named executive officers (NEOs) and the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company's independent auditor, respectively.

What is a "broker non-vote"?

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) permits brokers to vote their customers' stock held in street name on routine matters when the brokers have not received voting instructions from their customers. The NYSE does not, however, allow brokers to vote their customers' stock held in street name on non-routine matters unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. In such cases, the uninstructed shares for which the broker is unable to vote are called "broker non-votes". For purposes of determining the outcome of any proposal as to which the broker has physically indicated on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote, if allowed, these shares will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with respect to that proposal, even though those shares are considered entitled to vote for quorum purposes and may be entitled to vote on other proposals.

What non-routine matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

The election of directors and the advisory vote on our executive compensation are both non-routine matters on which brokers are not allowed to vote unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. Brokers not receiving voting instructions will only be allowed to vote on the ratification of our appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as the Company's independent auditor for fiscal 2016.

What routine matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

The ratification of the independent auditor is a routine matter on which brokers may vote in their discretion on behalf of customers who have not provided voting instructions.

Who will tabulate and certify the vote?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., an independent third party, will tabulate and certify the vote, and

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        3

Table of Contents

will have a representative to act as the independent inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting.

If I vote by telephone or Internet and received a proxy card in the mail, do I need to return my proxy card?

No.

Who is soliciting my vote?

Our Board is soliciting your vote for the Annual Meeting.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

We will announce the preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and disclose the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the date of the Annual Meeting unless only preliminary voting results are available at that time. To the extent necessary, we will file an amended Current Report on Form 8-K to disclose the final voting results within four business days after the final voting results are known. You may access or obtain a copy of these and other reports free of charge on the Company's

website athttp://www.newfield.com, or by contacting our investor relations department at 281-210-5321. Also, the Form 8-K, any amendments thereto and other reports filed by the Company with the SEC are available to you over the Internet at the SEC's website athttp://www.sec.gov.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

We are not aware of any matters that will be considered at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other matters arise at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in your proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting is held to vote on the proposals listed in this Proxy Statement and to transact any business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

How do I vote?

There are four ways to vote:




GRAPHICInternet

GRAPHICTelephone

GRAPHICMail

GRAPHICMeeting

Visithttp://www.proxyvote.com, the website for Internet voting. Follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card by mail, follow the instructions on the proxy card. Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 16, 2016.Call 1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card, by following the instructions on the proxy card. Telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 16, 2016.If you received a proxy card by mail, you can complete, sign, date and return in the postage-paid envelope provided. If your proxy card is returned unsigned, your vote cannot be counted. If your proxy card is signed without indicating how to vote, your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board. Your proxy card must be received by May 16, 2016.You may vote at the Annual Meeting online through the linkwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016. The 12-digit Control Number provided on your Notice or proxy card is necessary to vote. We urge you to vote prior to the meeting by one of the other three methods.


If you hold your Newfield shares in a brokerage account, your ability to vote over the Internet or by telephone depends on your broker's voting process. Please follow the directions on your proxy card or the voter instruction card from your broker carefully. If your Newfield shares are held in Newfield's 401(k) Plan, then your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on May 15, 2016. The plan administrator will direct the trustee to vote shares as to which no instructions are received in proportion to voting directions received by the trustee from all plan participants who vote.

The Board recommends that you vote using one of the first three methods discussed above. Using one of the first three methods discussed above to vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you later decide to change your vote while attending the Annual Meeting.

​

4        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Can I change my vote?

Yes. You may revoke or change a proxy before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting by:

If your shares are held in our 401(k) Plan, you also may revoke or change your proxy by submitting another valid proxy by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and, if mailed, is properly signed. The new 401(k) Plan participant proxy must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on May 15, 2016.

Who pays for the proxy solicitation related to the Annual Meeting?

We will bear the entire cost of this solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, the mailing of the Notice and any mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy, and any additional information furnished to stockholders. In addition to using the mail, proxies may be solicited by directors, executive officers, and other employees of Newfield, in person or by telephone. No additional compensation will be paid to our directors, executive officers, or other employees for these services. You also may be solicited by means of press releases issued by Newfield, postings on our website athttp://www.newfield.com, or other media forms. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist us with the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of approximately $7,500 plus expenses. Georgeson ensures that brokers, custodians and nominees will supply additional copies of the proxy materials for distribution to the beneficial owners. We also will reimburse banks, nominees, fiduciaries, brokers and

other custodians for their costs of sending the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Under Delaware law, abstentions are treated as present and entitled to vote and thus, will be counted in determining whether a quorum is present. In addition, broker non-votes (described above) will be considered present for quorum purposes but not considered entitled to vote on that matter.

What is the difference between a "stockholder of record" and a stockholder who holds stock in "street name," also called a "beneficial owner"?

If your shares are registered in your name at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are a "stockholder of record". If your shares are registered at American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC in the name of a broker, bank, trustee, nominee, or other similar stockholder of record, your shares are held in "street name" and you are the "beneficial owner" of the shares.

Can I vote my stock by filling out and returning the Notice?

No. The Notice will, however, provide instructions on how to vote by Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card, or by submitting a ballot electronically during the Annual Meeting.

What is householding?

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC known as "householding". Under this procedure, multiple stockholders residing at the same address have the convenience of receiving a single copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, unless they have notified us that they want to continue receiving multiple copies. Householding allows us to reduce the environmental impact of providing proxy materials as well as printing and mailing costs.

If you received a householded mailing this year and you would like to have additional copies of the Annual Report, Proxy Statement and/or the Notice

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        5

Table of Contents

of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials mailed to you, or you would like to revoke your consent to the householding of documents, please submit your request to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. either by calling 1-800-542-1061 or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Broadridge or Newfield will promptly deliver any additional copies requested. If you revoke your consent, you will begin to receive individual copies of future mailings within 30 days after we receive your revocation notice.

Unfortunately, householding for bank and brokerage accounts is limited to accounts within the same bank or brokerage firm. For example, if you and your spouse each have two accounts containing our common stock at two different brokerage firms, your household will receive two copies of our Annual Meeting materials – one from each brokerage firm. To reduce the number of duplicate sets of materials your household receives, you may wish to enroll some or all of your accounts in our electronic delivery program. See "Why didn't I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?"

Alternatively, if you have previously revoked your consent to the householding of documents and would now like to receive a single copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you may submit such request to Broadridge as indicated above.

How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet. Our proxy materials are also available on our website at:

http://www.proxyvote.com

Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we have sent to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A stockholder's election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

Why didn't I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?

We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to help reduce the costs we incur in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or using the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

​

6        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Set forth below in question and answer format, is a discussion about our corporate governance policies and practices and other matters relating to our Board and its Committees.

General
Have you adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines?
Yes. The Board is responsible for, and believes in, overseeing the Company’sCompany's assets and business affairs in an honest, fair, diligent and ethical manner driven by goodbest corporate governance principles.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

To fulfill its responsibilities, the Board follows the procedures and standards set forth in its Corporate Governance Guidelines.

These Corporate Governance Guidelines address matters such as as:

DIRECTOR SELECTION PROCESS AND GUIDELINES

The Board also has established “Director"Director Selection Process and Guidelines”Guidelines", which are attached as Appendix A to the Corporate Governance Guidelines and outlinesoutline the process and criteria for selecting director nominees.

Have you adopted a Code Please see the discussion below of Ethics and Conduct?
Yes. the Nominating & Governance Committee of the Company for more information regarding the director selection process.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS, FINANCIAL CODE OF ETHICS AND INSIDER TRADING POLICY

Our Board has formally adopted, and annually reviews and approves, our Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable togoverning the conduct and decisions of our directors, officers and employees. In addition, theour Board has adopted, and annually reviews and approves, our Financial Code of Ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer and Controller or Chief Accounting Officer, and our Insider Trading Policy applicable to all directors, officerseach director, officer, employee and employees.

How can I view or obtain copiesconsultant of your corporate governance materials?
The guidelines and codes mentioned above, as well as the charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation & Management Development Committee, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and Operations & Reserves Committee of our Board, are available on our website for viewing and printing. Go to Company.

http://www.newfield.com BOARD OF DIRECTORS

and then to the “Corporate Governance – Overview” tab.Director Independence

Board of Directors
How many independent directors do you have? How do you determine whether a director is independent?

Our Board has affirmatively determined that 10eight of our 11nine current directors and seveneight of our eightnine nominated directors are “independent”"independent" as that term is defined by the NYSE rules. Joseph H. Netherland, who also served as a director in 2014, was "independent" under the NYSE rules. In making this determination, our Board considered

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        7

Table of Contents

various transactions and relationships between each director nominee or his or her immediate family and our Company and its subsidiaries. Our Board has also affirmatively determined that each of John R. Kemp III, Charles E. Shultz, Howard H. Newman, and Richard K. Stoneburner, each of whom served as directors for some part of 2015 prior to their respective retirements or resignations, were also "independent" under NYSE rules. The purpose of this review by our Board was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were material and, therefore, inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent. In the ordinary course of business during 2014,2015, we entered into purchase and sale transactions for products and services with certain companies affiliated with members of our Board of Directors, as described below:



•
Mr. Nance is a director of The Williams Companies. In 2014,2015, we paid The Williams Companies approximately $1.9 million in lease payments for our office space in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 7

In each case, the transactions were for less than 2% of the consolidated gross revenues of the director-affiliated company.

See also “Interests of Management and Others in Certain Transactions”"Related Person Transactions". We generally expect transactions of a similar nature to occur during 2015.

2016.

As a result of its review, our Board affirmatively determined, based on its understanding of such transactions and relationships, that all of the nominees for director are independent of our Company under the standards set forth by the NYSE, with the exception of Lee K. Boothby. Mr. Boothby currently serves as our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.CEO. There are no family relationships between any of the nominees for director or between any nominee and any executive officer of our Company.

How many times did your

Director Attendance at Board meet last year?

Meetings and Committee Meetings

Our Board met in person or by telephone conference fourfive times during 2014.

Did any2015. Other than an absence from one committee meeting by one director, our current directors attended 100% of your directorstheir applicable meetings during 2015. Mr. Newman, who served on your Board during 2014 attend fewer than 75%did not stand for re-election at the Company's 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, attended 50% of Compensation Committee meetings held in 2015 due to his prior resignation from the meetings of your Board and his or her assigned Committees during 2014?
No.
Do you have a policy regarding director attendanceBoard.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders?

Yes. Stockholders

Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meetings of Stockholders. All of our then current directors attended the 20142015 Annual Meeting.

Do your non-management, independent directors meet in executive session?
Yes.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management, Independent Directors

Our non-management, independent directors meet in executive session on a regular basis – usually at each regularly scheduled meeting of our Board. All of our non-management directors are independent. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our independent directors will meet in executive session at least annually and more frequently as needed at the call of one or more of our independent directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that executive sessions will be presided over by the Lead Director. Charles E. Shultz served as our Lead Director from May 2013 through May 2015. Steven W. Nance has served as our Lead Director since Mr. Shultz's retirement in May 2013.2015. If the Lead Director is not in attendance, these executive sessions will be presided over by such other person chosen by vote of the non-management or independent directors, as applicable.

How is your Board’s leadership structured?

Board Leadership Structure

We historicallydo not have combineda policy with respect to the separation of the roles of Chairman of the Board (Chairman) and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), other than for periods of time after the retirement of a CEO. In February 2012, in connection with revising our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (Governance Committee) and the other independent members of our Board evaluatedannually evaluate the appropriate leadership structure for our Company. As part of their evaluation, they considered our past leadership structures, the leadership structures of peer companies in our industry and corporate governance trends. After considering all of these factors, our Governance Committee recommended, and our Board approved, not to support implementing a policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman and CEO. In many situations, theThe Board believes a combined Chairman/CEO office can provide significant benefits for our stockholders, including a unified approach to strategy and execution and a Chairman that has a pulse on the day-to-day business of the Company and therefore knowledge of the important issues to be addressed by the Board. The Board, believes that the decision to separate the offices of Chairman and CEO should be part of the succession planning process and that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make a determination regarding this issue as appropriate under the circumstances at the time.

Our Governance Committee and Board believe that combining the role of CEO and Chairman continues to be appropriate. The Board believes that having the CEO also serve as Chairman providesprovide the Company with a clear leadership structure providesand provide the Board with valuable insight into the Company’sCompany's operations and strategies from management’smanagement's perspective andthat facilitates the flow of information

​

8        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

between management and the Board. The Board also believes that this leadership structure ensures the appropriate level of independent oversight because:



•
the Lead Director collaborates with the Chairman with regards to setting the agenda for each meeting of the Board;

•
Board committees are composed entirely of independent directors;


•
the independent Compensation & Management Development Committee (Compensation Committee) annually evaluates the performance of our CEO and reviews the evaluation with the independent members of our Board; and


•
all of the director nominees, other than Mr. Boothby, our CEOPresident and President,CEO, are independent under the standards set forth by the NYSE.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 8


What are the responsibilitiesChairman of the Chairman and the Lead Director?
Board

The Chairman ensures the overall effectiveness of the Board and will:



•
serve as a liaison between the Board and management; and


•
chair the annual stockholder meetings.

Lead Director

The Lead Director holds a valuable role in both the overall leadership of the Board and creating an atmosphere in which the Board can enhance the success of the Company. The Lead Director will:



•
brief the Chairman/CEO and management, as needed, on the issues discussed in the executive sessions;


•
serve as a mentor and provide guidance to the Chairman/CEO as requested or needed;


•
collaborate with the Chairman/CEO on the agendas for the meetings of the Board (including schedule and materials);


•
act as a liaison between the non-management and independent directors and the Chairman/CEO and management;
management, including with regard to the interest of the independent directors in having particular issues or topics addressed in a meeting of the Board;

•
preside over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present or has a conflict;


•
coordinate the retention of consultants and advisors who report directly to the Board on Board matters (as opposed to committee consultants and advisors);


•
facilitate and assist the Governance Committee with Board, Committeecommittee and director evaluations and communicatecommunicates results;


•
assist the Chairman/CEO and Chair of the Compensation Committee with succession planning, as necessary;


•
foster a respectful atmosphere in which directors feel comfortable asking questions, providing insight and engaging in dialogue;
as requested from time to time by the Chairman/CEO,​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        9

Table of Contents



•
as needed or requested by the Board, perform other corporate governance duties.
Can interested parties communicate directly

Communications with your non-management directors?

Non-Management Directors

Yes. We have established an Ethics Line, consisting of a website that facilitates submission of reports over the Internet and toll-free numbers that can be used from all the countries in which we operate, so that investors, employees and any other interested parties can anonymously report through a third party any practices thought to be in violation of our corporate governance policies. The Ethics Line also can be used to make concerns known to, or send other communication to, our non-management or independent directors (individually or as a group), including our Lead Director, on a direct and confidential basis. The web address for our Ethics Line iswww.newfieldexploration.ethicspoint.com and the telephone number for the Ethics Line in the United States, Guam, Puerto Rico and Canada is 866-593-5936. Additional information regarding the Ethics Line is available on our website athttp://www.newfield.comunder the tab “Corporate"Corporate Governance – Overview”Overview".

What is your Board of Directors’ role in risk oversight?

Risk Oversight

Management is responsible for implementing our financial and business strategies, and assessing and managing the risks relating to our Company and its performance under those strategies. Our Board reviews, approves (where appropriate) and monitors our financial and business objectives, strategies, plans and major corporate actions. Our Board also assesses major risks relating to our Company and its performance, and reviews options to mitigate and address such risks.

Our Board retains the primary responsibility for strategicto oversee risks related to our strategy and risk oversight.business. To assist the Board in discharging its oversight responsibilities, members of management report to the Board and its committees on areas of risk to our Company, and our Board committees consider specific areas of risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight and report to the full Board regarding their activities. For example, our Audit Committee discusses with management our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. Our Compensation & Management Development Committee incorporates risk considerations, including the risk of loss of key personnel, as it evaluates the performance of our CEO and other


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 9

executive officers, reviews management development and succession plans, and considers risks related to our compensation programs and policies. Our Governance Committee focuses on issues relating to Board composition, leadership structures and corporate governance matters. Our Operations & Reserves Committee reviews, evaluates and oversees the Company's risks relating to our operations, including safety, environmental, regulatory and compliance (SERC) and reserves. In addition to receiving reports from Board committees regarding the risks considered in their respective areas, to ensure that our Board has a broad view of our strategy and overall risk management process, the Board will specifically review our long-term strategic plans and the principal issues and risks that we may face, as well as the processes through which we manage risk, during at least one Board meeting per year. This enables the full Board to coordinate risk oversight, especially with respect to risk interrelationships. At this point, we believe that combining the roles of Chairman and CEO enhances the Board’sBoard's administration of its risk oversight function because, through his role as Chairman, our CEO is able to provide the Board with valuable insight into our risk profile and the options to mitigate and address our risks based on his experiences with the daily management of our business as our CEO.
How are your directors compensated?
Only non-management directors are compensated

Stock Ownership Guidelines for serving as directors. See “Non-Management Director Compensation” beginning on page 15 for information about our non-management director compensation.

Do you have stock ownership guidelines for directors?
Yes. Directors

The Board believes that an alignment of director interests with those of stockholders is very important. All non-management directors are expected to own stock in the Company equal in value to five times the annual base cash retainer, not including any cash retainers paid to a director for serving as the Chairman, the Lead Director or a Chair of a Committee. Such ownership must be accomplished within five years from a director’sdirector's first appointment to the Board.

Do you have a mandatory retirement age

​

10        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Mandatory Retirement Age for directors?

Yes, ifDirectors

If a director reaches age 72 while in office, such director must resign at the end of his or her then current term, unless (a) the members of the Governance Committee unanimously (not including the director in question if such director is a member of the Governance Committee) waive such requirement due to special circumstances; and (b) the action is ratified and approved by a majority of the disinterested directors on the Board.

Do you have In 2016, J. Terry Strange reached our mandatory term limitsretirement age. The Governance Committee determined that it was prudent to waive Mr. Strange's mandatory retirement for directors?
No. one year, and that waiver was ratified and approved unanimously by the disinterested directors of the Board.

No Mandatory Term Limits for Directors

The oil and gas industry is a very specialized industry that can take years to truly understand. The Board believes that the Company and its stockholders benefit from Board continuity and stability that allows directors to focus on long-term business strategies and results. For these reasons, among others, the Board does not believe it should establish arbitrary term limits for directors based on years of service. Such term limits are likely to force the Company to lose the contribution of directors who have developed significant and valuable insight into the Company, its operations and industry that cannot easily be replaced.

Does your

Board have any standing committees?

Yes. Committees

Our Board presently has the following significant standing committees:



•
Compensation & Management Development Committee;


•
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee; and


•
Operations & Reserves Committee.

Each of these Committees is composed entirely of independent directors.

Has your Board adopted charters for each

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Role of these Committees? If so, how can I view or obtain copies of them?

Yes. Our Board has adopted a charter for each of these Committees along with Corporate Governance Guidelines. The charters and guidelines are available on our website for viewing and printing. Go to http://www.newfield.com and then to the “Corporate Governance – Overview” tab.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 10

Audit Committee
What does the Audit Committee do?

The primary purposes of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board in monitoring:



•
the qualifications and independence of our independent auditors;


•
the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors; and


•
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee also prepares a report each year in conformity with the rules of the SEC for inclusion in our annual Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, retaining and terminating our independent auditors and also performs the specific functions set forth in its charter.

Who are the members

Composition of the Audit Committee?

Committee

The Audit Committee currently consists of Pamela J. Gardner, Roger B. Plank, Thomas G. Ricks, Juanita M. Romans, John (Jack) W. Schanck, C. E. (Chuck) ShultzJ. Terry Strange, and J. Terry Strange,Kent Wells, with Mr. Ricks serving as Chair. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the standards set forth by the NYSE. Mr. Strange also serves on the audit committees of Group 1 Automotive, Inc., New Jersey Resources Corporation and BBVA Compass. Our Board has determined that such simultaneous service on these other audit committees and on our Audit Committee does not impair the ability of Mr. Strange to serve effectively on our Audit Committee.

Does the Audit Committee have an audit committee financial expert?
Yes.

Our Board has determined that each of Messrs. Ricks, Strange and StrangePlank meets the qualifications of an audit committee financial expert, as defined by SEC regulations, and is independent, under the standards set forth by the NYSE.

How many times did the Audit Committee meet last year?
regulations.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        11

Table of Contents

The Audit Committee held sevenfive meetings in person or by telephone conference during 2014.

2015.

COMPENSATION & MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

Role of Compensation & Management Development Committee

What does the Compensation & Management Development Committee (Compensation Committee) do?

The primary purposes of the Compensation Committee are:



•
producing a report on executive compensation each year for inclusion in our annual Proxy Statement;


•
overseeing the evaluation and development of Company management; and


•
overseeing succession planning for our Chief Executive OfficerCEO and other senior executive officers.
officers; and

•
performing such other functions as the Board may assign to the Compensation Committee from time to time.

The Compensation Committee has authority to oversee the administration of compensation programs applicable to all of our employees, including executive officers, and also performs the specific functions set forth in its charter. The Compensation Committee may delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate.

Who are the members

Composition of the Compensation Committee?

Committee

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Pamela J. Gardner, John Randolph Kemp III, Steven W. Nance, Howard H. NewmanRoger B. Plank, Juanita M. Romans, and Richard K. Stoneburner,J. Terry Strange, with Mr. KempStrange serving as Chair. Each Compensation Committee member is independent under the standards set forth by the NYSE.

How many times did the Compensation Committee meet last year?

The Compensation Committee held eight meetings in person or by telephone conference during 2014.


2015.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 11


What are the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration and determinationDetermination of executive compensation?
Executive compensation is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committee with the assistance of an independent consultant.

The Compensation Committee generally reviews and makes its decisions regarding the annual compensation of our executive officersNEOs at its regularly scheduledregularly-scheduled meeting in February of each year.February. These decisions include adjustments to base salary,determination of annual incentive cash awards for the prior year's performance and adjustments to base salary, the establishment of target incentive opportunities and applicable performance objectives for the current year's annual incentive awards and grants of long-term equity-based incentive awards.awards for the current year. The Compensation Committee also makes adjustments to compensation adjustments as necessary at other times during the year, such as in the case of promotions, other changes in employment status, the occurrence of significant corporate events and for competitive purposes. In making its decisions, the Compensation Committee assesses each NEO's impact during the year and his or her overall value to our Company, specifically considering the NEO's leadership skills, recommendations received from our CEO and its independent compensation consultant(s), impact on strategic initiatives, performance in his or her primary area of responsibility, his or her role in succession planning and development, and other intangible qualities that contribute to corporate and individual success.

Annually, our CEO provides the Compensation Committee with an evaluation of his own performance that is based, in large part, upon the Company performance metrics described below under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2015 Compensation Decisions – Annual Incentive Awards," as well as of his broad leadership roles as Chairman of the Board and our lead representative to the investment community. The Compensation Committee may delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate. See “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussionevaluates our CEO on these and Analysis” beginning on page 26 for more information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processesother criteria, and procedures for consideration and determination of executive compensation.

How doeshis total compensation package is determined entirely by the Compensation Committee, consider risk when determiningbased on its evaluation and input from Meridian Compensation Partners LLC, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant (Meridian), and reflects his performance, the performance of our Company and competitive industry practices. Each year, our CEO prepares an evaluation of each of the other NEOs and makes compensation programs?
Therecommendations to the Compensation Committee. In developing his recommendations, the CEO considers the self-evaluation prepared by each NEO, the recommendations of his executive team, input from internal executive compensation experts, as well as

​

12        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

performance against the Company performance metrics and each NEO's performance against his or her individualized goals. Meridian reviews and provides comments to the Compensation Committee has discussed and analyzedon our CEO's recommendations.

Independent Compensation Consultant

During 2015, the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation programs and believes that the Company’s compensation programs (i) do not motivate our executive officers or our non-executive employees to take excessive risks, (ii) are well designed to encourage behaviors aligned with the long-term interests of stockholders and (iii) are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee with the assistance ofretained Meridian as its independent compensation consultant arrived at this conclusionto assist the Compensation Committee in executive compensation matters and did not engage any other consultant to provide executive compensation consulting services during 2015. Meridian assists the Compensation Committee in developing a competitive total compensation program that is consistent with our philosophy of goal-oriented pay for the following reasons:


Our employees receive both fixed and variable compensation. The fixed (salary) portion provides a steady income regardless of the Company’s stock performance and allows executivesus to focusattract, retain and motivate talented executives. For 2015, Meridian's services included providing an annual analysis of the compensation of our top executive officers and their counterparts at peer companies. The analysis consists of a comparison of each element of compensation and a comparison of total direct compensation, including the level of total compensation provided to our executive officers. In addition, during 2015, Meridian aided the Compensation Committee's consideration of allocation between annual incentive and long-term equity-based compensation and between the types of long-term equity-based incentive awards. Meridian also provides the Compensation Committee with assistance in the design of compensation and benefit programs and ongoing support with respect to regulatory and other considerations impacting compensation and benefit programs generally, as requested by the Compensation Committee.

Meridian reports exclusively to the Compensation Committee, which has sole authority to retain any compensation consultant to be used by the Compensation Committee to assist in the evaluation of compensation for our CEO and other executive officers, as well as our overall executive compensation structure. In early 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of Meridian during 2015 and determined that there were no conflicts of interest as a result of the Compensation Committee's engagement of Meridian based on the Company’s business without an excessive focus onfollowing:


The annual cash incentive awards for employeesCompany other than executives are 100% discretionary and determined based upon several factors, includingthose as advisor to the Company’s performance and individual performance. In determiningCompensation Committee.

•
The fees for service Meridian charged the Company in 2015 amounted to less than 1% of Meridian's annual incentive performance factor for officers' annual cash incentives, 70%revenues.

•
It is non-discretionary operational metrics and 30% is discretionary strategic metrics. The Company performance metrics are designedMeridian's policy that when it represents a client's compensation committee, it does not offer the company any additional services.

•
Except with respect to ensure a proper balance between stock performance, operational metrics, financial goals and strategic goals. See “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 26 for more information.

Our restricted stock units generally vest over three years, which discourages short-term risk taking.

We have established policies to mitigate compensation risk, including stock ownership guidelines for officers, insider-trading prohibitions and limitations on incentive awards under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan.

Thethe engagement by the Compensation Committee, provides independent oversight for all compensation programs, including plans for officers and all employees.

Between 25% and 50% of all long-term incentives grantedneither Meridian nor its principal representative to our executives are performance-based stock units.  These performance-based stock units are subject to risk of forfeiture if the long-term total stockholder return objectives are not met, which encourages a long-term perspective by our executives.  In addition, a substantial portion of our executives’ long-term equity compensation is forfeited upon voluntary termination, which encourages our executives to maintain a long-term focus.
The Compensation Committee believes that these factors discourage short-term risk taking and encourage allCompany maintains any business or personal relationship with any executive officer or committee member of the Company’s employeesCompany.

•
Neither Meridian nor its principal representative to focus on Newfield’s sustained long-term performance.
the Company owns any Company stock.

NOMINATING & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Role of Nominating & Corporate Governance (Governance) Committee

What does the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee (Governance Committee) do?

The primary purposes of the Governance Committee are:

advisingare to:

evaluating

•
evaluate potential or suggested director nominees and identifyingidentify individuals qualified to be directors;
nominating

•
nominate directors for election at our Annual Meetings of Stockholders or for appointment to fill vacancies;
recommending

•
recommend to our Board the directors to serve as members of each committee of our Board and the individual members to serve as chair of the committees;

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement

•
12

approvingapprove the compensation structure for all non-management directors;
advising

•
advise our Board about corporate governance practices, developingdevelop and recommendingrecommend to the Board appropriate corporate governance practices and policies and assistingassist the Board in implementing those practices and policies;
overseeing​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        13

Table of Contents

overseeing its committees; and

•
oversee the new director orientation program and the continuing education program for all directors.

The Governance Committee also performs the specific functions set forth in its charter.

Who are the members

Composition of the Governance Committee?

Committee

The Governance Committee currently consists of Pamela J. Gardner, John Randolph Kemp III, Howard H. Newman,Steven W. Nance, Thomas G. Ricks, Juanita M. Romans, John W. Schanck and J. Terry Strange, with Mr. StrangeNance serving as Chair. Each Governance Committee member is independent under the standards set forth by the NYSE.

How many times did the Governance Committee meet last year?

The Governance Committee held threefive meetings in person or by telephone conference during 2014.

Does the Governance Committee have a policy on diversity when selecting director candidates?
In selecting director candidates, the Governance Committee and the Board take diversity into account, seeking to ensure a representation of varied perspectives and experiences, although the Governance Committee’s 2015.

Director Selection Guidelines do not prescribe specific standards for diversity. Through its succession planning process, which occurs at least annually, the Governance Committee reviews a matrix of the skills and elements of diversity for all directors to ensure that the Board represents the appropriate and relevant skills, perspectives and experiences.

What processes and guidelines does the Governance Committee follow when considering a director nominee for a position on your Board?Nominees

The Board has adopted Director Selection Process and Guidelines that have established criteria for nominating directors, screening candidates and evaluating the qualifications of director nominees. The Governance Committee recommends director nominees who are ultimately approved by the full Board. The Governance Committee considers candidates suggested by its members, other directors, senior management and stockholders in anticipation of upcoming director elections and actual or expected Board vacancies. The Governance Committee is authorized, at the expense of the Company, to retain search firms, consultants, and any other advisers it may deem appropriate, in order to identify and screen potential candidates.

candidates, including those nominated or recommended by stockholders.

The Governance Committee reviews the size and structure of the Board and considers director tenure, skills and experience in determining the slate of nominees and as part of director succession planning. When evaluating candidates, the Governance Committee takes into account the needs of the Board and the Company. In determining these needs, the Committee consults with the other Board members and key members of senior management; considers the results of recent Board and Governance Committee self-evaluations; identifies needs due to upcoming retirements and anticipated vacancies; and, if needed, consults with external advisors of its choosing.

The Governance Committee attempts to achieve a balanced representation of core competencies important to the Board's oversight role for the long-term success of the Company's business strategies. The Governance Committee endeavors to find candidates of high integrity who have a solid reputation and record of accomplishment in their chosen fields and who display the independence of mind and strength of character to effectively represent the best interests of all stockholders. Candidates are selected for their demonstrated ability to exercise good judgment, and to provide practical insights and diverse perspectives. In addition to demonstrated leadership skills in strategy and development, risk management and succession planning, the Governance Committee considers experience in the following areas: the oil and gas industry and operations; health, safety and environmental matters; international company operations; finance and accounting; technology; corporate social responsibility and public policy matters.

The Governance Committee considers potential candidates in light of the entirety of their credentials, including their personal and professional integrity and business ethics; their strength of character and judgment; their ability and willingness to devote sufficient time to Board duties; their potential contribution to the diversity and culture of the Board; their educational background; their business and professional achievements and experience and industry background, particularly in light of the Company's strategic plan and challenges; their ability to represent the interests of all stockholders of the Company; their strategic vision and leadership experience at the policy-making level; their demonstrated knowledge of corporate governance matters applicable to U.S. based companies; their demonstrated ability to understand and respect the advisory and proactive oversight responsibility of the Board; their comprehension of the role of a public company director, particularly the fiduciary duties owed to the Company and all of its stockholders under applicable law; their interest in any agreement, arrangement, or understanding with any person or entity that might limit or interfere with their ability to comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable law; their independence from management under NYSE Listing Standards and the Corporate Governance Guidelines; their expressed willingness to comply with all publicly disclosed policies and guidelines of the Company with respect to codes of conduct, corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality, stock ownership and trading applicable to the directors; and

​

14        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

their compliance with Board policies related to matters such as the number of boards on which a director may sit and other requirements as set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

After reviewing the qualifications of potential candidates, the Governance Committee determines the candidates that will proceed to the next step of evaluation, which is typically an in-person interview. To the extent feasible, potential candidates will be interviewed by the Chairman, CEO and a majority of the Governance Committee members. The results of these interviews will be considered by the Governance Committee in its decision to recommend a director candidate to the Board for nomination. In addition to reviewing the qualifications of new candidates, the Governance Committee will also review sitting directors who are being considered for re-nomination in light of the above considerations and their past contributions to the Board.

Does

Diversity Policy for Director Candidates

In selecting director candidates, the Governance Committee consider candidatesand the Board take diversity into account, seeking to ensure a representation of varied perspectives and experiences, although the Governance Committee's Director Selection Process and Guidelines do not prescribe specific standards for yourdiversity. Through its succession planning process, which occurs at least annually, the Governance Committee reviews a matrix of the skills and elements of diversity for all directors to ensure that the Board submitted by stockholdersrepresents the appropriate and if so, what are the procedures for submitting such recommendations?

Yes. relevant skills, perspectives and experiences.

Stockholder Recommendations of Director Nominees

As provided in the Governance Committee’sCommittee's charter and the Director Selection Process and Guidelines, it is the Governance Committee’sCommittee's policy to consider suggestions from many sources, including stockholders, regarding possible candidates for director. In general, the Governance Committee will use the same process to evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders as it uses to evaluate all other director candidates, as set forth in response to the previous question.above. However, if a candidate is recommended by a specific stockholder or a group of stockholders, the Governance Committee would evaluate the candidate to assess whether the candidate could impartially represent the interests of all stockholders without unduly favoring the particular interests of the recommending stockholder or group of stockholders.


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 13

If a stockholder wants the Governance Committee to consider a possible candidate for director, the name of the possible candidate, together with appropriate biographical information, should be submitted to the Chair of the Governance Committee, c/o JohnTimothy D. Marziotti,Yang, Corporate Secretary, Newfield Exploration Company, 4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77380. Stockholders who wish to propose a matter for action at a stockholders’stockholders' meeting, including the nomination of a director for election, must comply with the provisions of our Bylaws that are described in this Proxy Statement in the section entitled “Stockholder"Stockholder Proposals for 20162017 Annual Meeting and Director Nominations”Nominations".

What is the Governance Committee’s process

Director Compensation

Only non-management directors are compensated for determining director compensation?

serving as directors. The Governance Committee has the sole authority to approve the compensation structure for all of our non-management directors. The Governance Committee may delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate.

Director compensation is reviewed at least annually by the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee seeks to set director compensation at an adequate level to compensate directors for their time and effort expended in satisfying their obligations to us without jeopardizing their independence.

The Governance Committee has determined that the non-management director compensation for 2014/2015 includes the following:
annual cash retainer of $75,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Governance Committee of $10,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Audit Committee of $25,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Compensation Committee of $20,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Operations & Reserves Committee of $20,000;
annual restricted stock award of $200,000; and
annual fee for the Lead Director of $75,000.

See “Non-Management Director Compensation”"Director Compensation" below for a more detailed description of our non-management director compensation programs.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        15

Table of Contents

OPERATIONS & RESERVES COMMITTEE

Role of Operations & Reserves (Operations) Committee

What does the Operations & Reserves Committee (Operations Committee) do?

The primary purposes of the Operations Committee are to assist the Board inin:

the Company's operations, including SERC and the analysis and reporting of the Company's proved reserves;

•
assisting the Compensation Committee in evaluating the Company's performance with respect to certain operational metrics included in the annual incentive award program; provided that the Compensation Committee ultimately makes all determinations regarding the performance goals and
achievement of performance goals under the annual incentive award program for executive officers;

•
reviewing, evaluating and discussing future projects;

•
reviewing, evaluating and discussing the risks related to the Company's operations.
day-to-day operations; and

•
performing such other functions as the Board may assign the Operations Committee from time to time.

The Operations Committee is responsible for engaging independent counsel and other advisers, including engineers or geologists, as it determines necessary to carry out its duties and also performsperform the specific functions set forth in its charter.

Who are the members

Composition of the Operations Committee?

Committee

The Operations Committee currently consists of John R. Kemp III, Steven W. Nance, Roger B. Plank, John (Jack) W. Schanck C. E. (Chuck) Shultz and Richard K. Stoneburner,J. Kent Wells, with Mr. Schanck serving as Chair. Each member of the Operations Committee is independent under the standards set forth by the NYSE.

How many times did the Operations Committee meet last year?

The Operations Committee held fivesix meetings in person or by telephone conference during 2015.

INTERESTS OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN CERTAINRELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Although we have not formally adopted written policies or procedures for the approval of related person transactions, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code of Conduct), which applies to all employees, executives and directors, specifically prohibit conflicts of interests, except under guidelines approved by the Board. Under the Code of Conduct, a “conflict"conflict of interest”interest" is defined as any circumstance that could cast doubt on a person’sperson's ability to act with total objectivity with regard to the Company’sCompany's interests. Any employee or director who becomes aware of a conflict or potential conflict is


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 14

asked to bring it to the attention of a supervisor, management or other appropriate personnel, who then is required to document and report the outcome of such matters to our compliance officer. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board must resolve any conflict of interest question involving the CEO or any executive officer.

In addition, the Corporate Governance Guidelines state that directors shall attempt to avoid any situation that may give rise to a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. If an actual or potential conflict of interest arises, the Directordirector must promptly inform the Chairman of the Board and the Chair of the Governance Committee (or in the event a potential conflict arises with the Chair of the Governance Committee, he or she shall notify the Chair of the Audit Committee) and recuse himself or herself from any Board deliberations or decisions related to the matter that is the subject of the conflict of interest. If an actual or potential conflict exists and cannot be resolved by a director’sdirector's recusal from participation in discussions or deliberations related to the matter or in any other reasonable manner, the Director is expected to offer to tender his or her resignation to the Chair of the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee shall determine whether to accept or reject such offer.


Further, the Governance Committee and our Board annually review related person transactions with respect to directors (including those transactions described below with respect to directors and those described above under “Corporate Governance−"Corporate Governance–Board of Directors”Directors") as part of their annual assessment of director independence and the director nomination process, as provided in our written corporate governance guidelinesCorporate Governance Guidelines and the written

​

16        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

charter of our Governance Committee. Other related person transactions are disclosed to our Board or a Board committee and are addressed on a case-by-case basis.

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Only non-employee directors are compensated

Susan G. Riggs, our Treasurer, was a minority owner of Huffco International L.L.C. ("Huffco"). In May 1997, before Ms. Riggs joined us, we acquired from Huffco an entity now known as Newfield China, LDC, the owner of a 12% interest in a three field unit located on Blocks 04/36 and 05/36 in Bohai Bay, offshore China. Huffco retained preferred shares of Newfield China that provide for serving as directors. Currently, Mr. Boothby, our Chairmanan aggregate dividend equal to 10% of the Board, Presidentexcess of proceeds received by Newfield China from the sale of oil, gas and Chief Executive Officer, isother minerals over all costs incurred with respect to exploration and production in Block 05/36, plus the only Board member who is an employeecash purchase price we paid Huffco for Newfield China ($6 million). Effective July 1, 2013, the Company purchased from Huffco the outstanding preferred shares of ours,Newfield China. During 2013, Newfield China paid approximately $2 million of dividends to Huffco on the preferred shares of Newfield China (no dividends were paid in 2015 or 2014).

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

The Corporate Governance Guidelines and his compensationCodes mentioned above, as an employee is included inwell as the Summary Compensation Table of the Proxy Statement.

Director Compensation Program
In May 2014, the Governance Committee considered the compensation of the non-management directors and determined that no changes were necessarycharters for the 2014/2015 period. As a result, compensation for non-management directors remained as follows:
annual cash retainer of $75,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Governance Committee of $10,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Audit Committee, of $25,000;
annual fee for the chair of the Compensation Committee, of $20,000;
annual fee for the chair of theGovernance Committee and Operations Committee of $20,000;
annual restricted stock award of $200,000; and
annual fee forour Board, are available on our website athttp://www.newfield.com under the Lead Director of $75,000.
As of December 31, 2014, each of our non-employee directors held 5,947 unvested restricted shares. These shares are scheduled to vest on May 14, 2015, the day before our 2015 Annual Meeting, subject to the non-employee director’s continued service through such date.

tab "Corporate Governance – Overview".

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    152016 PROXY STATEMENT        17


Annual Cash Fees and Restricted Stock Awards
The following table contains information about our non-employee directors’ fiscal year 2014 compensation.
Name 
 
Fees Earned or 
Paid in Cash ($)
 
Stock 
Awards(1) ($)
 
All Other 
Compensation(2) ($)
 Total ($)
Pamela J. Gardner $75,000
 $199,998
 —
 $274,998
John Randolph Kemp III 95,000
 199,998
 —
 294,998
Steven W. Nance 75,000
 199,998
 $2,500
 277,498
Joseph H. Netherland 37,500
 —
 —
 37,500
Howard H. Newman 75,000
 199,998
 —
 274,998
Thomas G. Ricks 100,000
 199,998
 —
 299,998
Juanita M. Romans 75,000
 199,998
 —
 274,998
John (Jack) W. Schanck 95,000
 199,998
 —
 294,998
C. E. (Chuck) Shultz 150,000
 199,998
 2,500
 352,498
Richard K. Stoneburner 75,000
 199,998
 —
 274,998
J. Terry Strange 85,000
 199,998
 —
 284,998
___________________
(1)Reflects the full grant date fair value of the 2014 restricted stock awards to our non-employee directors, computed in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, as required by SEC regulations. The grant date fair value of the 2014 awards was $199,998 based on the mean of the high and low sales price of our common stock on the grant date. See also Note 11, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC.

(2)Reflects charitable contributions with respect to 2014 pursuant to our matching gift program for non-employee directors. Under this program, we match our non-employee directors’ charitable contributions up to $2,500 per year.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee of our Board (Governance Committee) has nominated the eightnine people named below for election as directors at our Annual Meeting. The Board currently consists of 11 directors; however, three of our current directors, Messrs. Howard H. Newman, C.E. (Chuck) Shultz and Richard K. Stoneburner, will not seek nomination for the 2015/2016 term, and will be retiring effective May 14, 2015. The Board has not had sufficient time to analyze and determine additional nominees for this vacancy. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number than the eightnine nominees named herein.

Each nominee below, if elected, will serve as a director until our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and thereafter until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Unless instructions to the contrary are given, all properly delivered proxies will be voted for the election of these eight nominees as directors.

Our Bylaws require that each director receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections (the number of shares voted “FOR”"FOR" a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST”"AGAINST" that nominee). All director nominees identified in the following list currently are serving on our Board. If our stockholders do not elect a nominee who is serving as a director, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director”"holdover director". Under our Bylaws, if a nominee who currently is serving as a director does not receive a sufficient number of votes for re-election, that director must submit an irrevocable resignation in writing to the Chair of the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee must make a recommendation to our Board regarding whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Our Board would then act on the Governance Committee’sCommittee's recommendation and, if the resignation is rejected, publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days after the date that the election results were certified.

If any nominee is unable or unwilling to serve, the proxy holders will vote for such other person as may be nominated by the Governance Committee. Alternatively, our Board may reduce the size of the Board. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected as a director.

Our Board is a collection of individuals with a variety of complementary skills derived from their diverse backgrounds and experiences. All of our director nominees currently serve on our Board, and our Board has determined that each of our nominees, other than Mr. Boothby, (our President and Chief Executive Officer), is independent. The following information, which is as of March 1, 2015,21, 2016, is furnished with respect to each of the nominees for election at our Annual Meeting:


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 16

GRAPHIC
Lee K. Boothby, 54
Director since 2009
Chairman since 2010















Mr. BoothbyMR. BOOTHBY currently serves as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.CEO. He was promoted to the position of President in February 2009 and to the additional role of Chief Executive OfficerCEO in May 2009. From October 2007 until February 2009, Mr. Boothby served as our Senior Vice President – Acquisitions & Business Development. He managed our Mid-Continent operationsbusiness from February 2002 to October 2007, and was promoted from General Manager to Vice President in November 2004. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Boothby served as the Vice President and General Manager of our previous Australian business unit, managed from Perth, Australia. Prior to joining Newfield, Mr. Boothby worked for Cockrell Oil Corporation, British Gas and Tenneco Oil Company.

Education:EDUCATION: B.S. in Petroleum Engineering from Louisiana State University and M.B.A. (finance concentration) from Rice University

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Mr. Boothby brings to our BoardSPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
:

Relevant Management and Leadership ExperienceExperience: – President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of the Company since 2009; and led two of the Company’sCompany's business units including– the Mid-Continent and Australian business unitsAustralia

Broad International ExposureExposure: – spent three years in Australia building our Australian business unit (which was divested in 2003)

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’sCompany's Business, Industry and CommunityCommunity: – over 1516 years in managerial positions at Newfield and more than 31nearly 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry; broad experience in both marine and onshore environments, inclusive of more than 1213 years of experience in North American resource plays; member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers; serves on the board of America’s Natural Gas Alliance and is currently serving as Treasurer;API Market Development Committee; served on the board of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, from June 2011 to June 2013; served as Chairman of the Board of the American Exploration & Production Council and continues to serve as a member of the Board; and holds degrees in petroleum engineering (B.S.) and business (M.B.A.)

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: – serves on industry Advisory Committee of the Louisiana State University Craft & Hawkins Department of Petroleum Engineering; and serves on the Council of Overseers and Energy Committee for the Rice University Jones Graduate School of Business

Lee K. Boothby, 53
Director since 2009
Chairman since 2010


​

18        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    172016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents



GRAPHIC
Pamela J. Gardner, 59
Director since 2005

Committees:

»

Audit

»

Compensation & Management Development

»

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 
Since January 2013, Ms. GardnerMS. GARDNER has served as the CEO with Your Mind at Work, a consulting firm that focuses on refining company cultures, training executives in effective communication strategies, aligning corporate goals and coaching professionals in leadership.leadership since January 2013. She spent 24 seasons with the Houston Astros Baseball Club, serving her last 11 years as President, Business Operations for Houston McLane Company d/b/a Houston Astros Baseball Club. Ms. Gardner began her career with the Houston Astros in 1989 as Director of Communications, was promoted to Vice President of Marketing in 1996, then promoted to Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing in 1999, and served in that role until becoming President in 2001. She then retired as President in January 2012, but continued to provide advisory services to the ownership group throughout 2012.

Education:EDUCATION: B.S. in Psychology and Vocational Rehabilitation from the University of Wisconsin – Stout

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience Ms. Gardner brings to our Board:

DiversitySPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
Diversity: – female; professional experience in strategic planning, project development, professional sports, nonprofit/charitable organizations and business; first female executive inducted into the Texas Baseball Hall of Fame; longest tenured female executive officer in Major League Baseball; public speaker and writer on women's leadership issues; recipient of the YWCA's Outstanding Woman of Achievement Award in 2006 and the Trailblazer Award from the Houston Women’sWomen's Chamber of Commerce; included in a special exhibit on Women in Baseball in the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York

Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer/President ExperienceExperience: – served as the President of Business Operations for the Houston Astros for 11 years; managed all business and operational aspects of the Houston Astros, including oversight of all revenue areas, building management, customer service, finances, sponsorship and ticket sales, community, advertising and marketing, as well as non-baseball events at Minute Maid Park; frequently presents to various groups and companies on leadership and diversity; received the Marguerite Ross Barnett leadership award from the Houston Area Urban League in 2008

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: – serves on the University of Houston Hobby School of Public Policy Advisory Board; serves on the Executive Committee of Central Houston, Inc., a not-for-profit organization concerned with urban planning, economic development, transportation issues, public safety, governmental affairs, and cultural and entertainment programs in Houston; serves as Chairman of the Mayor's program to end chronic homelessness in Houston; and Board member of the Harris County Houston Sports Authority, overseeing property and funds of Houston sports facilities

Pamela J. Gardner, 58
Director since 2005

Committees:
 » Compensation &
Management Development
 » Nominating & Corporate Governance

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 18

Mr. Kemp isfacilities; served on the PrincipalUniversity of The Kemp Company, a consulting firm he founded in 2008,Houston Hobby School of Public Policy Advisory Board; and served as the Chairman of Kosmos Energy Ltd.the Mayor's program to end chronic homelessness in Houston

​

GRAPHIC
Roger B. Plank, an international oil exploration and production 59
Director since 2015

Committees:

»

Audit

»

Compensation & Management Development

»

Operations & Reserves

MR. PLANK is a partner with Indian Creek Holdings, a private investment company, focused on West Africa, from 2010 until Januarya position he has held since March 2014. Mr. Kemp retired in 1999 after 34 years with Conoco Inc. (now ConocoPhillips) where the last position he held was President, Exploration & Production, Americas.

Education: B.S. in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering from Pennsylvania State University
Other Public Company Directorships Held in Past Five Years: Kosmos Energy Ltd. (2005 to January 2014 and Chairman since 2010). Mr. Kemp retired as Chairman and director of Kosmos in January 2014
Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Mr. Kemp brings to our Board:
Diversity – African American; and nearly 20 years of international management experience
Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer/President Experience – retired President, Exploration & Production, Americas for Conoco Inc.; and progressed through a series of engineering and managerial roles of increasing responsibility during his more than 34 years with Conoco Inc.
Broad International Exposure – 13 years leading the international exploration and production activities for Conoco Inc., including South America, Asia, Africa and the Middle East; nearly 20 years of international management experience; and eight years of experience serving as a director and three years as Chairman of Kosmos Energy Ltd.
Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry – over 40Plank has 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry; extensiveindustry, retiring from his position as President and Chief Corporate Officer of Apache Corporation in February 2014 after 32 years with the company. He began his career at Apache in 1981 and moved through the organization to take on a number of leadership positions, including Vice President – Planning and Corporate Development; Vice President – Corporate Planning; and Vice President – Corporate Communications. Mr. Plank served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 1997 to May 2000 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from May 2000 to February 2009. He was appointed President in February 2009, also serving as Principal Financial Officer from February 2009 to November 2010, and then appointed President and Chief Corporate Officer in February 2011 and served in that role until his retirement in February 2014.

EDUCATION: B.A. in Liberal Arts from Colgate University in New York and an M.B.A. from the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS IN PAST FIVE YEARS: Director of Parker Drilling (2004 to present; Lead Director (May 2013 to January 2016))

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
High Level of Financial Literacy: served as Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Officer at Apache Corporation; named among Institutional Investor magazine's best energy CFOs in America in 2004 and 2007

Relevant Leadership and Chief Financial/Corporate Officer Experience: more than 17 years in senior leadership roles at Apache Corporation including Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, President and Chief Corporate Officer

Extensive Knowledge of the Company's Business and Industry: Over 35 years of experience in health, safetythe oil and environmental matters;gas industry ranging from various leadership positions in corporate development to C-level executive; and holds a degree in petroleum and natural gas engineeringan M.B.A.

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: – Advisory Director forServes on the Houston Achievement Place, a not-for-profit entity with a mission to help children and their care-providers learn the skills and develop the relationships for home, school and life success; and personally mentors and provides financial support to deserving minority individuals. In 2013, Mr. Kemp became a memberboard of the Houston Independent School District's Energy Institute Advisory Board. The Energy Institute High School is the nation's first full magnet school with a wide theme of energy focusing in the areas of geoscience, alternative energy and offshore technology.Houston's Alley Theatre (previously Chairman)

John Randolph Kemp III, 70
Director since 2003

Committees:
 » Compensation & Management Development (Chair)
» Nominating & Corporate Governance
» Operations & Reserves




​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        19

Table of Contents



GRAPHIC
Steven W. Nance, 59
Director since 2013
Lead Director since May 2015

Committees:

»

Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair)

»

Compensation & Management Development

»

Operations & Reserves

 
 

Mr. Nance

MR. NANCE, our Lead Director, has served as President and Manager of Steele Creek Energy, LLC, a private oil and gas investment company, since 2010. Since 2007, Mr. Nance has, from time to time, provided consulting services on matters such as oil and gas investments, succession planning, coaching and leadership development. Mr. Nance began his career in 1978 with The Superior Oil Company where he held various engineering assignments until the company was acquired by Mobil Oil. Mr. Nance then joined Meridian Oil, Inc., the predecessor company to Burlington Resources, Inc., in 1985, where he held positions of increasing responsibility until his departure in 1997 as Vice President of Burlington’sBurlington's Gulf Coast division. From 1997 to 1999, he was with XPLOR Energy and its predecessor company, acting as its Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO in 1999 when XPLOR Energy was acquired by Harken Energy Corporation. From 2000 to 2007, Mr. Nance served as President of Peoples Energy Production Company until it was acquired by El Paso Corporation.

Education:EDUCATION: B.S. in Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University


Other Public Company Directorships in Past Five Years:OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS IN PAST FIVE YEARS: The Williams Companies, Inc. (2012 to present); Cloud Peak Energy, Inc. (2010 to present)

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Mr. Nance brings to our BoardSPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
:

Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer/President ExperienceExperience: - President and Manager of Steele Creek Energy, LLC; served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of XPLOR Energy from 1997-1999; served as President of Peoples Energy Production Company from 2000 to 2007

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’sCompany's Business and IndustryIndustry: - over 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry ranging from various engineering assignments at the beginning of his career to C-level executive;executive; and holds a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: - recognized as a Distinguished Engineer from the College of Engineering at Texas Tech and is a registered professional engineer (inactive status). He is on the board for The Center for the Performing Arts at The Woodlands.Woodlands

Steven W. Nance, 58
​

GRAPHIC
Thomas G. Ricks, 63
Director since 2013
1992

Committees:

» Compensation

Audit (Chair)

»

Nominating & Management Development

 » Operations & Reserves

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 20

Corporate Governance

 

MR. RICKS began serving as a director of Panacea Pharmaceuticals Inc., a private pharmaceutical development company, in 2015. Mr. Ricks currently serves as Chief Investment Officer of H&S Ventures L.L.C., a private investment firm. Prior to taking this position with H&S Ventures in May 2001, he was Chief Executive OfficerCEO of The University of Texas Investment Management Company from March 1996 to May 2001. Mr. Ricks also served as Vice Chancellor for Asset Management for The University of Texas System from August 1992 through February 1996 and as Executive Director of Finance and Private Investments from 1988 to 1992.

Education:EDUCATION: B.A. in Economics from Trinity College and M.B.A. from the University of Chicago

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Mr. Ricks brings to our BoardSPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
:

High Level of Financial Literacy and Risk Analysis ExpertiseExpertise: – over 30 years in various domestic and international finance positions in the oil and gas and financial industries, providing him with investment and financial experience combined with accounting and audit expertise; responsible for the management of a $15 billion endowment and operating fund supporting The University of Texas System; holds B.A. in Economics and M.B.A.; Certified Public Accountant (not licensed); and determined by the Board to be an audit committee financial expert, as defined by the SEC

Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer/President ExperienceExperience: – over five years of experience as the Chief Executive OfficerCEO of a $15 billion fund

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’sCompany's Business and IndustryIndustry: – served as one of our directors for 2124 years, providing invaluable knowledge of our strategy and business

Extensive Board and Corporate Governance ExpertiseExpertise: –serves on the Board of Panacea Pharmaceuticals Inc.; former director of BDM International, DTM Corporation, LifeCell Corporation and Argus Pharmaceuticals and brings to our Board significant knowledge on corporate governance matters

Community Commitment and Charitable ExperienceExperience: serves on the Investment Committee of the University of California Foundation – servesIrvine; previously served on the Audit Committee of the Samueli Foundation, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to create societal value by investing in innovative, entrepreneurial and sustainable ideas; serves on the Investment Committee of the University of California Foundation – Irvine; and previously served on the board of the Ocean Institute, a not-for-profit organization with the mission to inspire all generations, through education, to become responsible stewards of our oceans

Thomas G. Ricks, 61
Director since 1992
Committees:
 » Audit (Chair)
 » Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee


​

20        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    212016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents



GRAPHIC
Juanita M. Romans, 65
Director since 2005

Committees:

»

Compensation & Management Development

»

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 
 

Ms. Romans

MS. ROMANS serves as the CEO of the Romans Group, a private global healthcare consulting firm she founded in January 2011. From 2012-2013, Ms. Romans served as Managing Principal of MFR Healthcare Solutions (a partnership formed with the Romans Group). MFR Healthcare Solutions, Inc. provided strategic, tactical and operational planning consulting services to hospitals, universities, medical institutions and other providers in the global healthcare marketplace. From June 2006 to January 2011, Ms. Romans served as Chief Executive OfficerCEO and Central Market Leader of Memorial Hermann – Texas Medical Center, and from January 2003 to January 2011 she served as the Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Memorial Hermann Hospital.

Education:EDUCATION: B.S. in Biology from the University of Detroit and M.S. in Nursing from Wayne State University

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Ms. Romans brings to our BoardSPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
Diversity::

Diversity – female; and over 30 years of professional experience in medical and nursing industry, strategic planning, project development and nonprofit/charitable organizations

High Level of Financial Literacy and Risk Analysis ExpertiseExpertise: – over 20 years of experience in the areas of contracting, project development, partnerships, joint ventures and analyzing risks related to business strategy; and managed the costs, and responsible for the financial health, of Memorial Hermann Hospital with over 6,000 employees for sevennine years

Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer/President ExperienceExperience: – over nine years of experience as a Chief Executive OfficerCEO in a heavily-regulated and people-intensive medical industry where she was responsible for, among other matters, strategy development and execution, financial performance and operations

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: – serves on the board of Center for Houston’sHouston's Future; Executive Committee member, Houston Hispanic Chamber of Commerce; served on the board of Rice University Jones Business School, formerly a director of the Children’sChildren's Assessment Center, the South Main Center Association and Save our ERs; and a member of Texas Hospital Association, Voluntary Hospital Association, Texas Association for Public and Non-Profit Hospitals, Greater Houston Partnership and Texas Executive Women

Juanita M. Romans, 64
​

GRAPHIC
John W. Schanck, 63
Director since 2005
2013

Committees:

»

Audit

»

Nominating & Corporate Governance


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 22



»

Operations & Reserves (Chair)

 
 

Since October 2014, Mr. Schanck

MR. SCHANCK has served as a director of P2 Energy Solutions, a private company engaged in oil & gas software development and sales.sales since October 2014. Mr. Schanck servedhas over 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, most recently serving as President and CEO of Sonde Resources Corporation in Calgary, Alberta from 2010 until his retirement in June 2013. Sonde is an energy company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and natural gas with operations in Western Canada and offshore North Africa. Mr. Schanck spent the first 21 years of his career, 1978 to 1999, with Unocal Corporation and its subsidiaries. During that time, he helped lead Unocal’sUnocal's exploration activities in both the U.S. and international regions, holding the positions of Group Vice President -– Oil & Gas Operations from 1994 to 1996 and President of Spirit Energy 76 from 1997 to 1999. Following his career with Unocal, Mr. Schanck was Co-Chief Executive OfficerCo-CEO for Samson Investment Company from 1999 to 2005 and Managing Partner of Tecton Energy, LLC from 2006 to 2009.

Mr. Schanck is also a director of Saulsbury Industries, a private company engaged in engineering and construction.

Education:EDUCATION: M.S. in Geology from the University of Memphis, B.S. in Geology from Allegheny College and A.A. from Allegheny Community College


Other Public Company Directorships Held in Past Five YearsOTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS HELD IN PAST FIVE YEARS:. Penn West Exploration Ltd. (June 2008 to June 2014) and Sonde Resources Corp. (December 2010 to July 2013)

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Mr. Schanck brings to our BoardSPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
:

Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer/President ExperienceExperience: - President and CEO of Sonde Resources Corporation from 2010-2013; Co-Chief Executive OfficerCo-CEO for Samson Investment Company from 1999 to 2005; President of Spirit Energy 76 from 1997 to 1999

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’sCompany's Business and IndustryIndustry: - nearly 40over 35 years of experience in the energy industry where he has held leadership positions in both public and private companies, including C-level executive; and holds a B.S. and M.S. in Geology and B.S. in Geology.

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: – served on numerous not for profitnot-for-profit boards including Child Abuse Network, Tulsa, OK, board member and President of Spindletop Charities, Houston, TX, board member and President of United Way, Tulsa, OK

John W. Schanck, 62
Director since 2013
Committees:
 » Audit
 » Operations & Reserves (Chair)





​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    232016 PROXY STATEMENT        21

Table of Contents



GRAPHIC
J. Terry Strange, 72
Director since 2004

Committees:

»

Audit

»

Compensation & Management Development (Chair)

»

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 
Mr. Strange

MR. STRANGE is a 35-year34-year veteran of KPMG LLP. From 1996 until his retirement in 2002, he served as the Vice Chairman and Managing Partner of the U.S. Audit Practice of KPMG in addition to his service from 1998 until 2002 as the Global Managing Partner of the Audit Practice of KPMG International.

Education:EDUCATION: B.A.B.B.A. and M.B.A. in Accounting from the University of North Texas

Other Public Company Directorships in Past Five YearsOTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS IN PAST FIVE YEARS:: Group 1 Automotive, Inc., an automotive retailer (2005 to present); New Jersey Resources Corporation, a natural gas provider (2003 to present); BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., a commercial bank (2008 to present); and previously served as a director of SLM Corporation, known as “Sallie Mae”"Sallie Mae" (2008 to 2013)

Specific Qualifications, Attributes, Skills and Experience that Mr. Strange brings to our BoardSPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
:

High Level of Financial Literacy and Risk AnalysisAnalysis: – 34 years of service with KPMG in the audit division, including six years as Vice Chairman and overseeing internal risk management of the firm; assisted in developing information risk management team at KPMG; B.A.B.B.A. and M.B.A. in Accounting; Certified Public Accountant; named as one of 100 most influential accountants in 2001 by Accounting Today; and determined by the Board to be an audit committee financial expert, as defined by the SEC

Broad International ExposureExposure: – four years as the Global Managing Partner of the Audit Practice of KPMG International

Extensive Board and Corporate Governance ExperienceExperience: – serves on the audit committee and board of three additional public companies; an active participant and expert speaker for the National Association of Corporate Directors and an NACD Board Leadership Fellow, bringing to our Board significant knowledge on corporate governance matters

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’sCompany's Business and IndustryIndustry: – served clients in the energy industry for over 15 years; led the energy practice at KPMG for three years; significantly involved in the original development of the accounting standards released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the disclosure rules implemented by the SEC for the oil and gas industry; and assisted in writing the original oil and gas accounting industry guide published by the AICPA

Community Dedication and Charitable ExperienceExperience: – Chair of the Finance Committee of the National Cutting Horse Association

J. Terry Strange, 71
​

GRAPHIC
James (Kent) Wells, 59
Director since 2004
2015

Committees:

»

Audit

» Nominating

Operations & Corporate Governance (Chair)

Reserve

 

MR. WELLS has more than 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, most recently retiring from his position as CEO and President of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company in February 2015 after serving 32 years with Amoco and BP. Wells launched his career as a Petroleum Engineer with Amoco Canada Pet. Co. in 1979 and quickly advanced to take on a number of key roles in the organization. From 2000 through 2002, Mr. Wells held the position of Vice President, Rockies, and from 2002 through 2005, Vice President, Gulf of Mexico Shelf, BP America. He also served as General Manager, Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations, 2005 through 2007 and as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production North America Gas, BP America, from 2007 through 2011. He joined Fidelity Exploration & Production Company in 2011 where he assumed the responsibility of President and CEO. In 2013, he was made Vice Chairman of MDU Resources, the parent company of Fidelity, and elected to serve on its board. He retired from Fidelity and MDU Resources, including its board, in February 2015.

EDUCATION: B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Queen's University in Canada

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS IN PAST FIVE YEARS: Director of MDU Resources (2013 to 2015)

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
Relevant Leadership and Chief Executive Officer Experience: more than 15 years in leadership roles at BP and Fidelity including senior leadership positions as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production and CEO & President

Extensive Knowledge of the Company's Business and Industry: over 35 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, where he has held positions of increasing responsibility starting as a petroleum engineer focusing on drilling and advancing to C-level executive; significant experience in onshore gas resource plays in the United States while at BP; and holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering

Community Dedication and Charitable Experience: served on the Board of regional chapters of the MS Society and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation

Board Recommendation
BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR”"FOR" each of the foregoing nominees to serve as a director.

​

22        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Only non-employee directors are compensated for serving as directors. Currently, Mr. Boothby, our Chairman of the Board, President and CEO, is the only Board member who is an employee of ours, and his compensation as an employee is included in the Summary Compensation Table of the Proxy Statement.

Director Compensation Program

In May 2015, the Governance Committee considered the compensation of the non-employee directors and determined that no changes were necessary for the 2015/2016 period, other than the annual fee for the Governance Committee chair should be increased. As a result, compensation for non-employee directors was as follows:

 

      Compensation
for 2014/2015		    Compensation
for 2015/2016		  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Annual cash retainer

 ​ $75,000 ​ ​No change ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Annual fee for chair of the Governance Committee

   $10,000   $20,000  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Annual fee for chair of the Audit Committee

 ​ $25,000 ​ ​No change ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Annual fee for chair of the Compensation Committee

   $20,000    No change  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Annual fee for chair of the O&R Committee

 ​ $20,000 ​ ​No change ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Annual fee for the Lead Director

   $75,000    No change  
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Annual restricted stock award

 ​ $200,000 ​ ​No change ​
​  ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Annual restricted stock awards are granted pursuant to the Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. Each non-employee director who is in office immediately after an Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be granted restricted shares with a specified market value. The number of restricted shares granted is determined by dividing that market value by the average of the high and low sales prices of the Company's common stock on the date of the Annual Meeting. Each non-employee director who is appointed by the Board not in connection with an Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be granted restricted shares with the same market value as used for the previous Annual Meeting, with the number of restricted shares determined by dividing the market value by the average of the high and low sales prices of the Company's common stock on the date of appointment. In general, the restrictions on the shares granted will lapse on the day before the first Annual Meeting of Stockholders after the date of grant, provided that if a non-employee director terminates service as a director by reason of death or disability, the restrictions on the award will lapse as of the date of termination.

For 2015, Messrs. Plank and Wells received the standard compensation paid by the Company to non-employee directors, pro-rated to reflect the actual time each served on the Board for the 2015 fiscal year.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    242016 PROXY STATEMENT        23

Table of Contents

Director Compensation Table

The following table contains information about our non-employee directors' fiscal year 2015 compensation.

 

      Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash ($)		    Stock
Awards (1) ($)		    All Other
Compensation
(2) ($)		    Total ($)  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Pamela J. Gardner

 ​ $75,000 ​ $199,979 ​ $0 ​ $274,979 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

John Randolph Kemp III (3)

   $76,930   $199,979   $0   $276,909  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Steven W. Nance

 ​ $125,282 ​ $199,979 ​ $0 ​ $325,261 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Howard H. Newman (4)

   $27,816   $0   $0   $27,816  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Roger B. Plank (6)

 ​ $31,997 ​ $159,992 ​ $0 ​ $191,989 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Thomas G. Ricks

   $100,000   $199,979   $0   $299,979  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Juanita M. Romans

 ​ $75,000 ​ $199,979 ​ $0 ​ $274,979 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

John (Jack) W. Schanck

   $95,000   $199,979   $0   $294,979  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

C.E. (Chuck) Shultz (5)

 ​ $55,632 ​ $0 ​ $2,500 ​ $58,132 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Richard K. Stoneburner (4)

   $27,816   $0   $0   $27,816  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

J. Terry Strange

 ​ $91,291 ​ $199,979 ​ $0 ​ $291,270 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

James Kent Wells (7)

   $31,182   $159,992   $0   $191,174  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee
(1)
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the Newfield2015 restricted stock awards to our non-employee directors, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 ("FASB ASC Topic 718"), determined without regard to forfeitures, as required by SEC regulations. The grant date fair value of Directors currently consistseach 2015 award of $199,979 was based on the mean of the five directors whose names appear below. Each memberhigh and low sales price of our common stock on the May 15, 2015 grant date. The grant date fair value of each 2015 award of $159,992 (to Messrs. Plank and Wells) was based on the mean of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the NYSE’s listing standards. The primary purposeshigh and low sales price of the Audit Committee areour common stock on July 29, 2015. See also Note 14, Stock-Based Compensation, to assist the Board in monitoring:
the integrity of Newfield’s financial statements and financial reporting processes and systems of internal control;
the qualifications and independence of Newfield’s independent auditors;
the performance of Newfield’s internal audit function and independent auditors; and
Newfield’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, retaining and terminating Newfield’s independent auditors and also performs the specific functions set forth in its charter, which is available on our website. Go to http://www.newfield.com and then to the “Corporate Governance-Overview” tab.
The Audit Committee held seven meetings in person or by telephone conference during 2014. The meetings were designed to facilitate and encourage communication between the Audit Committee and Newfield’s internal auditors and independent auditors.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with Newfield’s management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Newfield’s independent auditors, the audited financial statements of Newfield included in itsour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2015 filed with the SEC, for a discussion of the assumptions used in determining the FASB ASC Topic 718 grant date fair value of these awards. As of December 31, 2015 (i) Mr. Kemp held 0 unvested restricted shares since shares granted to him in 2015 were forfeited upon his resignation from the Board, (ii) Messrs. Newman, Shultz and Stoneburner each held 0 unvested restricted shares since they either did not stand for reelection or retired in 2015 and therefore received no stock-based compensation for the year, (iii) Messrs. Plank and Wells each held 5,017 unvested restricted shares, and (iv) each other non-employee director listed in the table above held 5,735 unvested restricted shares. All unvested restricted shares are scheduled to vest on May 16, 2016, the day before our 2016 Annual Meeting, subject to the non-employee director's continued service through such date.

(2)
Reflects charitable contributions with respect to 2015 pursuant to our matching gift program for non-employee directors. Under this program, we match our non-employee directors' charitable contributions up to $2,500 per year.

(3)
Mr. Kemp resigned from the Board, effective October 22, 2015.

(4)
Messrs. Newman and Stoneburner did not stand for reelection to the Board at our 2015 annual meeting.

(5)
Mr. Schultz retired from the Board, effective May 14, 2015.

(6)
Mr. Plank was appointed to the Board, effective July 28, 2015.

(7)
Mr. Wells was appointed to the Board, effective August 1, 2015.
​

24        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS26
​ ​​

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

26
​ ​​
Our Recent Strategy – Navigating Low Commodity Prices27
2015 Results28
Our 2016 Actions & Priorities & Long-Term Business Strategy30
Total Stockholder Return (TSR) Performance31
Key 2015 Executive Compensation Actions33
Stockholder Outreach34

II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND COMPONENTS

35
​ ​​
Philosophy and Objectives35
Direct Compensation Components35
Pay for Performance36

III. 2015 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

38
​ ​​
Compensation Peer Group Analysis38
Base Salary39
Annual Incentive Awards39
Target Bonus Amounts39
2015 Company Performance Measures40
2015 Annual Incentive Plan Goal Determination42
Individual Performance Measures44
2015 Annual Incentive Award Payout Determinations45
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards45
Time-Based RSUs46
Performance-Based RSUs46
Other Compensation48



IV. 2016 COMPENSATION PROGRAM49
​ ​​
2016 Peer Group Changes49

V. COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

50
​ ​​
Stock Ownership Guidelines50
Incentive Compensation Clawback51
Prohibited Transactions51
Tax Deductibility Considerations51
Compensation Policies and Practices Related to Risk Management51

COMPENSATION & MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

52
​ ​​

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

53
​ ​​
Summary Compensation Table53
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 201554
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 201556
Stock Vested in 201558
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation58
Deferred Compensation Plan58
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control59
Change of Control Severance Agreements59
Outstanding Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards61
Other Compensation Plans61
Post-Employment Tables61

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

65
​ ​​

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

65
​ ​​
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        25

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The AuditCompensation & Management Development Committee of our Board (Compensation Committee) oversees our compensation programs for executive officers and all employees. The purpose of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) is to explain the Compensation Committee's compensation philosophy, summarize our executive compensation programs and describe compensation decisions for the Company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and three other most highly compensated executive officers for 2015 (NEOs). The NEOs for 2015 are the following individuals:

    •
    Lee K. Boothby, Chairman of the Board, President and CEO;

    •
    Lawrence S. Massaro, Executive Vice President and CFO;

    •
    Gary D. Packer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (COO);

    •
    George T. Dunn, Senior Vice President – Development; and

    •
    John H. Jasek, Senior Vice President – Operations.

This CD&A should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures under "Executive Compensation Tables," beginning on page 53, and is divided into five sections:

    (I)
    Executive Summary (beginning on page 26), which provides a high level overview of our corporate vision and strategy, key Company performance outcomes and NEO compensation decisions for 2015, and our recent stockholder outreach initiative;

    (II)
    Executive Compensation Philosophy and Components (beginning on page 35), which describes the philosophy and objectives of our executive compensation program, the direct compensation elements provided to our NEOs and the purpose of each element, and the pay for performance alignment of the compensation provided to our CEO;

    (III)
    2015 Compensation Decisions (beginning on page 38), which describes and provides an analysis of the specific compensation decisions made for our NEOs for 2015;

    (IV)
    2016 Compensation Program (beginning on page 49), which provides certain information regarding changes to our executive compensation program for 2016; and

    (V)
    Compensation Policies and Practices (beginning on page 50), which discusses compensation-related policies we have implemented to reflect our commitment to the best corporate governance practices.

For additional information regarding the role and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, as well as those of the other committees of our Board, please see "Corporate Governance" beginning on page seven.

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Newfield is a large independent exploration and production company, with estimated proved reserves of approximately 509 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE) and consolidated fourth quarter 2015 production of approximately 162 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. Our operations are focused primarily on large scale, liquids rich resource plays in the U.S. In addition, we have offshore oil developments in China.

The Company has undergone significant change over the last decade. We have transitioned from a diversified asset base of U.S. and international onshore and offshore operations to a more focused portfolio of U.S. onshore liquids-rich plays with extensive drilling inventories. Furthermore, we have transitioned our proved reserves and production from primarily natural gas to a greater percentage of oil and natural gas liquids.

​

26        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Our corporate vision is clear: to be recognized as the premier exploration and production company, delivering operational excellence, top-tier business results and value to our stockholders, employees and the communities where we live and work. We believe our transformation has contributed to our position as a leader in our sector in total stockholder return over the past five years, which was driven in part by our superior performance in the past two years as shown in the chart below:


Relative TSR performance - 2 year
NFX vs E&P peer group

GRAPHIC

Our Recent Strategy – Navigating Low Commodity Prices

Our industry has been significantly impacted by lower crude oil and natural gas prices. Following a period of five years of unprecedented strength and consistency, oil prices began collapsing in late 2014 and averaged approximately $49.00 per barrel in 2015 and have been as low as $26.21 per barrel to date in 2016. Despite this, Newfield was a leading performer in the stock market in 2015. Our stock price increased 20% during the year, eclipsing the average decrease of approximately 40% in our sector. We were also the top E&P performer in the S&P 500 Index.

Recently, we've taken significant and proactive steps to preserve liquidity, ensure financial strength and to prepare our Company to succeed in a low commodity price environment:

    •
    Recapitalized our Company in early 2015, issuing approximately $815 million in equity which we used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility and money market lines of credit, with any remaining funds being used for general corporate purposes. This was our first equity issuance in more than a decade.

    •
    Issued $700 million of our 5 3/8% Senior Notes due 2026 and used the proceeds from that issuance to redeem our 6 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020.
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        27

Table of Contents

    •
    During 2015, we received proceeds of approximately $90 million associated with the continuing sale of non-strategic assets.

    •
    Upsized our credit facility by $400 million to $1.8 billion and extended its term by two years to 2020. At year-end 2015, our credit facility was undrawn and our money market line of credit had approximately $39 million drawn.

    •
    High-graded our 2015 capital investments and reduced expenditures by 26% compared to 2014. We re-directed capital from lower return areas into the Anadarko Basin where our drilling returns are the highest and drilling holds our acreage by production.

    •
    Reduced our per unit-of-production lease operating expenses by 21% compared to 2014 levels and implemented innovative ways to cut costs and consequently enhance margins. We expect that many of these savings will be sustainable even as commodity prices recover.

2015 Results

Our strong performance in 2015 can be attributed to achievements in the following four categories:

FINANCIAL STRENGTH

In 2015, we took significant and proactive steps to ensure financial strength and a sound capital structure (equity, debt, extended and increased credit facility) and to prepare Newfield for a low commodity price environment. In addition to the steps mentioned on pages 27-28, we managed risks through our hedging program, partially offsetting the negative impact of low commodity prices and realized commodity derivative income of approximately $500 million in 2015. We estimate approximately $270 million in realized commodity derivative income in 2016, both amount and strip prices as of February 19, 2016.

OPERATIONAL EXECUTION

We had excellent performance in 2015, consistently beating expectations, raising production guidance and reducing our future unit cost outlooks. The strong performance was across the organization, with each region achieving (or exceeding) its beginning of the year targets on production and costs and expenses. A summary follows:

    •
    Exceeded domestic and international production targets during the year. Domestic guidance was increased twice during 2015 and we surpassed fourth quarter expectations despite a negative impact due to weather in December.

    •
    Added nearly 90 MMBOE in estimated proved reserves in the Anadarko Basin, a year-over-year increase of nearly 50%. Positive additions helped offset significant price related revisions (SEC oil price down 47%, SEC natural gas price down 40% YOY). Total Company proved reserves decreased 21% YOY to 509 MMBOE (65% proved developed).

    •
    Continued to deliver "best-in-class" well results in the Williston Basin.

    •
    Achieved strong performance against all of our safety, environmental, regulatory and compliance (SERC) metrics.
​

28        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

ADVANCEMENT OF SCOOP AND STACK

The market was laser-focused on our Anadarko Basin results in the SCOOP and STACK plays in 2015. Improving well performance, lower well costs, completion optimizations, and confidence in our resource and inventory all combined to drive our share price performance during the year. Highlights include:

    •
    Grew Anadarko Basin production to a fourth quarter 2015 average of approximately 75,000 BOEPD. Anadarko Basin today comprises almost half of total Company production and proved domestic reserves.

    •
    Active development of SCOOP underway. Continued to de-risk STACK acreage through held by production drilling and remain encouraged with multiple development horizons across the play. Recent industry success provides additional encouragement for the prospectivity of our acreage in the immediate vicinity.

    •
    Lowered best-in-class STACK well costs to approximately $7.4 million in 2015, down from a beginning-of-the-year estimate of $8.5 million. Drilling days have been reduced across the play and completions are being optimized to improve returns.

    •
    Demonstrated continuous improvement in average well performance throughout the year. Average well results are tracking at/above our 950 MBOE type curve for the STACK play.

    •
    Signed a marketing agreement with MarkWest Energy Partners in STACK. Moving oil production from truck to pipe by mid-2016 and expecting an improvement in current differential to NYMEX WTI. Future oil sales will be via Cushing, Oklahoma.

    •
    Added 20,000 net acres in our STACK play and moved our total Anadarko Basin net acreage position to more than 315,000 net acres.

IMPROVED ORGANIZATIONAL FOCUS, COMMUNICATION AND VISION ALIGNMENT

In addition to our solid financial and operating performance, we advanced key strategic initiatives in 2015 to improve our organizational focus and communications at all levels, reduce general and administrative (G&A) expense and more effectively deploy talent. Our actions in 2015 led to results that support our future and that reflect and are aligned with our corporate vision:to be recognized as the premier E&P company delivering operational excellence, top-tier business results and value to our stockholders, employees and the communities where we live and work. Highlights include:

    •
    Improved our deployment of key talent, organizational structure and G&A costs through the combination of our Rocky Mountain and Onshore Gulf Coast business units. We also closed our Denver office.

    •
    We anticipate reducing our 2016 expected G&A expenses. We reduced our overall workforce by more than 20% through a reduction in force, the closure of our Denver-based business unit and the subsequent consolidation of two business units.

    •
    Completed succession planning for all levels through "director" and developed and implemented a tailored Leadership Development Program.

    •
    Continued to monetize non-strategic assets and received proceeds of approximately $90 million in 2015. These continued monetizations align with our focus on domestic resource plays of scale.
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        29

Table of Contents

Our 2016 Actions & Priorities & Long-Term Business Strategy

Although 2015 was a year of significant and proactive adaptation by Newfield, we've already taken additional steps in 2016 to maintain our financial strength and to weather a weak commodity price environment, including:

    •
    Earlier this year we issued approximately $775 million in equity, which we used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility and money market lines of credit, with any remaining funds being used for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and working capital.

    •
    Newfield's 2016 capital budget is expected to be $625 – $675 million (excluding about $100 million in capitalized interest and direct internal costs), down about 50% over 2015 investment levels of approximately $1.4 billion, excluding capitalized internal costs.

    •
    Anticipate reducing our 2016 projected general and administrative expenses. In 2015, we reduced our overall workforce by more than 20% through a reduction in force, the closure of our Denver-based business unit and the subsequent consolidation of two business units into one located adjacent to our headquarters in The Woodlands, Texas.

The Company has adapted its near-term business plan to include four key priorities:

    1.Preserve liquidity – Reducing expenditure levels and better aligning cash flow with capital investments will be paramount to preserving liquidity and managing leverage ratios. We have an unsecured credit facility with $1.8 billion of available borrowing capacity and a term that extends through 2020.

    2.HBP STACK acreage – We plan to run an active rig program in our STACK area to hold acreage by production. At year-end 2015, about half of our 225,000 net acres in STACK was held by production (HBP).

    3.Reduce operating expenses, preserve margins – Over the last year, we reduced domestic lease operating expenses by nearly 25% and took steps to lower 2016 gross general and administrative expense. The high-grading of investments into the Anadarko Basin is expected to further enhance our domestic cost structure and realized commodity prices.

    4.Monetize additional non-strategic assets – We plan to launch a process to sell additional non-core assets. Proceeds from a potential sale would be used to fund our capital program and manage short-term borrowing levels.

Despite significant near-term changes to our business strategy, our long-term business strategy continues to be delivering stockholder long-term value through the consistent growth of cash flow, production and proved reserves. The recent efforts to refine our asset base and focus our investments on oil and liquids-rich onshore resource plays in the U.S. are consistent with our corporate vision.

Today, we operate in several U.S. basins with our primary growth area located in the Anadarko Basin of Oklahoma. The Anadarko Basin has an extensive inventory and resilient economics at lower oil and natural gas liquids prices. We anticipate that approximately 80% of our capital investments in 2016 will be allocated to the Anadarko Basin.

Our long-term business strategy includes the following:

    •
    Creating value for our stockholders by focusing on select, quality assets in leading liquids-rich plays while maintaining the appropriate size and scale of operations to optimize those assets;

    •
    Focusing on organic opportunities through disciplined capital investments;

    •
    Continuously improving our operational efficiency and economic returns;

    •
    Preserving a strong and flexible balance sheet;

    •
    Executing select, strategic acquisitions and divestitures; and

    •
    Attracting and retaining quality employees who are aligned with stockholders' interests.
​

30        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Total Stockholder Return (TSR) Performance

We successfully executed our 2015 business plan. We believe that our solid balance sheet, operational execution and the continued positive developments in our SCOOP and STACK differentiated our story from those of other E&P companies in 2015. As a result, we were the top performing E&P stock in the S&P 500 Index with a gain of approximately 20% in 2015, compared to an average decline of approximately 44% in a group of our peers in the E&P industry that we are likely to be compared against (the E&P Peer Group). For 2015, the E&P Peer Group was composed of different companies than the TSR Performance Peer Group and 2015 Compensation Peer Group because the peer group used for TSR performance purposes reflects the companies with whom Newfield competes for investors as opposed to executives or customers. A chart comparing our 2015 TSR is included below and highlights our exceptional performance in 2015 versus the E&P Peer Group:


RELATIVE TSR PERFORMANCE – 1 Year
NFX vs E&P peer group

GRAPHIC

Further, following a five-year period of unprecedented strength and consistency from 2010 through most of 2014, oil prices began collapsing in late 2014. The price of oil (WTI) in January 2016 averaged approximately $32 per barrel, as compared to approximately $95 per barrel in January 2014. Natural gas prices also experienced significant declines in 2014 and 2015, as the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price during that period ranged from a high of $6.15 per MMBtu in February 2014 to a 17-year low of $1.76 per MMBtu in December 2015. Despite those significant challenges, when comparing our performance over the past three years versus the E&P Peer Group, we again excelled on our total shareholder return:

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        31

Table of Contents


RELATIVE TSR PERFORMANCE – 3 Year
NFX vs E&P peer group

GRAPHIC

Over the last five years, our stock had a negative return of 55% compared to an average negative return of 33% for the E&P Peer Group. Over the last five years, however, we have significantly repositioned our Company. Rather than being a gas-focused, geographically disparate organization, we are today focused on liquids-rich unconventional plays onshore U.S. with a significant acreage position in the world class STACK and SCOOP, which have yielded exceptional results, and we have a deep portfolio of drilling opportunities there and elsewhere from which to create future value for our shareholders. Although that transformation had a significant impact on our total shareholder return in 2011 and a portion of 2012, the consequences of that transformation in more recent years on our operational and financial performance have been noticed by investors and is reflected in our one, two and three year total shareholder return versus the E&P Peer Group:

​

32        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents


RELATIVE TSR PERFORMANCE – 5 Year
NFX vs E&P peer group

GRAPHIC

Key 2015 Executive Compensation Actions

As described in more detail throughout this CD&A, our executive compensation programs and actions delivered outcomes aligned with our solid operational, financial and strategic performance in 2015 and the current market conditions, which are reflected in the following compensation decisions and outcomes:

    •
    The Compensation Committee elected not to increase NEO base salaries for 2015 due to the 2015 business climate. See "2015 Compensation Decisions – Base Salary."

    •
    To emphasize the significance of our near-term and relative operational performance measures, the Compensation Committee increased the portion of our 2015 annual incentive awards tied to those measures from 60% to 75% and approved a collective 2015 annual incentive award payout factor (AIP Factor) of 1.76 or 176% with respect to the overall Company performance measures. See "2015 Compensation Decisions – Annual Incentive Awards."

    •
    The Compensation Committee granted performance-based restricted stock units ("RSUs") constituting 40% - 50% of the total long-term equity-based incentive award value granted to the NEOs for 2015, with quarterly determination dates during the one-year TSR performance earning window (changed from monthly determination dates, which were used for the 2014 awards). See "2015 Compensation Decisions – Long Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards."

    •
    With respect to previously granted performance-based RSUs, the NEOs earned 55% and 70% of the performance-based RSUs granted in 2011 and 2012, respectively, based on the Company's relative TSR performance against the TSR Performance Peer Group (as defined below). See "Executive Compensation Philosophy and Components – Pay for Performance."
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        33

Table of Contents

See "2016 Compensation Program" in this CD&A for a discussion of certain 2016 compensation actions and decisions.

Stockholder Outreach

Over the last year, we increased our outreach efforts to stockholders and solicited feedback on our executive compensation programs, corporate governance, safety and environmental programs, corporate responsibility and other important issues.

These increased efforts were encouraged by our Compensation Committee following the results of the say on pay advisory vote at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, approximately 72% of the total votes cast (excluding abstentions) were in favor of our say-on-pay proposal, down from more than 90% approval at our 2013 and 2014 annual meetings. Although our executive compensation programs remained largely consistent over this three year period, the Compensation Committee carefully reviewed our executive pay programs during 2015 and encouraged management to increase its stockholder engagement efforts in light of the advisory vote results.

During 2015, we solicited feedback from stockholders representing approximately 70% of our outstanding common stock and met with or held phone conversations with management of our stockholders representing approximately 50% of our outstanding common stock. Our Board and its relevant committees discussed this constructive feedback and it was used to strengthen our compensation programs, improve our disclosure practices in this proxy statement and address other governance matters. They also sought an appropriate balance in our executive compensation program to best serve the interests of our stockholders while continuing to attract, motivate and retain the talent necessary to achieve the Company's strategy. We value the views of our stockholders and will continue to solicit this feedback in the future.

Although stockholders expressed a variety of views and many relevant topics were discussed in these outreach meetings, we believe the table below summarizes the most relevant topics and outlines our responses to each.

FeedbackOur Responses
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
The majority of annual long-term equity-based incentive awards should be performance-based​Effective for the year 2016, we eliminated our two-year TSR performance period and for future periods all performance-based equity awards will be subject to a three-year performance period, with the NEOs eligible to earn between 0% and 200% of the target share number. See "2016 Compensation Program."​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​
Executive compensation should be less discretionary and tied more directly to assessable performance measuresPrior to engaging in our 2015 stockholder outreach, we increased the portion of our annual incentive awards for 2015 tied to objective relative and near-term Company performance measures from 60% to 75%, and we utilized specific and assessable strategic priorities for purposes of evaluating performance with respect to the 25% strategic measurement portion of the 2015 awards. See "2015 Compensation Decisions – Annual Incentive Awards." We have continued this approach for our 2016 annual incentive awards.
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​
​  Compensation drivers including goals, rigor of targets and formulas should be clearly described​We enhanced disclosure in our 2016 proxy statement regarding our annual incentive award goals and determinations.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
The role of Lead Director should be well defined and disclosedWe increased disclosure on the specific duties of our Lead Director. See "Corporate Governance – Board of Directors."
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  The process and selection criteria for Board member nominations should be better described​We increased disclosure around the role of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which oversees Board member nominations. See "Corporate Governance – Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee."​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​

34        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

II. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND COMPONENTS

Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy is guided by the following objectives:

    •
    Goal-Oriented Pay for Performance.  The cornerstone of our compensation program is "pay for performance." In making compensation decisions, we focus on annual and long-term Company performance and measure performance against our peers and against goals and measures at the Company and individual levels.

    •
    Competitive Compensation.  The Compensation Committee believes it is imperative to maintain market competitive compensation programs to attract, retain and motivate executives and our future leaders that are in line with the compensation of similar executive positions at peer companies.

    •
    Alignment with Long-Term Stockholder Interests.  By providing a significant portion of compensation in the form of long-term equity-based incentive awards, including time-based and performance-based RSUs, we closely align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders in an effort to create long-term stockholder value.

Direct Compensation Components

In support of our compensation philosophy and objectives, total direct compensation received by our NEOs for 2015 is comprised of the elements included in the chart below. The elements of indirect compensation provided to our NEOs are described below under "– 2015 Compensation Decisions – Other Compensation."

GRAPHIC

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        35

Table of Contents

Over the last several years, the Compensation Committee has shifted more NEO total direct compensation towards variable "at risk" compensation (annual incentive awards and long-term equity-based incentive awards), where actual amounts earned may differ from target amounts based on Company and individual performance. In addition, under the combined leadership of the Compensation Committee and our executive team, we have improved alignment of our executive compensation with our near- and long-term business strategies. Our annual incentive awards are designed to primarily reward performance against our near-term strategies. Conversely, our long-term equity-based incentive awards are designed to reward achievements consistent with our long-term business strategies.

The Compensation Committee believes that a program weighted towards variable, at risk compensation, including stock price performance, ensures NEO interests are appropriately aligned with stockholder interests. The charts below illustrate the mix of 2015 target total direct compensation for our CEO and NEOs:

GRAPHIC

For our NEOs, the charts above are based on the following: (i) 2015 base salaries, as discussed on page 39, (ii) target bonus amounts with respect to 2015 annual incentive awards, as discussed beginning on page 39, and (iii) the targeted grant date fair value for the 2015 grants of time- and performance-based RSUs, as discussed beginning on page 45. The amounts actually realized by our NEOs with respect to the annual incentive awards and RSUs granted in 2015 depend, as applicable, on the level of attainment of the relevant performance goals and the value of our common stock when the awards vest.

Pay for Performance

We believe our executive compensation programs play an important role in helping us achieve our business objectives and effectively reward our executive officers for their contributions to those achievements. As illustrated above, the target total direct compensation of our NEOs is heavily weighted towards variable, at risk compensation (annual incentive awards and long-term equity-based incentive awards) that is tied to Company and individual performance and, as a result, the actual amounts realized or realizable at a given point in time often differ from the target total direct compensation awarded and from the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

​

36        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

The table below reflects the difference between our CEO's 2015 compensation at target level, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, and based on the actual realized and actual realizable value of the compensation as of December 31, 2015, as compared to our TSR for 2015, which demonstrates the pay for performance alignment of our executive compensation program.

Compensation Component 

 Target Total
Direct
Compensation 		 Summary
Compensation
Table (1) 		 Actual Realized
Amount at
12/31/2015 (2) 		 Actual Realizable
Amount at
12/31/2015 (3) 		 Total
Stockholder
Return (TSR) 		 

Base Salary

 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 ​​ 

Annual Incentive Award

 
$
1,020,000		 
$
1,800,000		 
$
1,800,000		 
$
1,800,000		    

Time-Based RSUs

 
$
2,550,000
 
$
2,880,020
 
$
2,542,198
 
$
2,389,774
 
​
​		 

Performance-Based RSUs

 
$
2,550,000		 
$
3,158,099		 
$
2,037,685		 
$
4,500,118		    
​​​ ​​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​ ​​ ​​

Total

 
$
6,970,000
 
$
8,688,119
 
$
7,229,883
 
$
9,539,892
 
​
20.1%		 
​​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​
(1)
As reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2015. The annual incentive award amount is reported based on the amount actually paid for 2015 instead of the target bonus amount. Time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs are reported based on their aggregate grant date fair value for accounting purposes.

(2)
Instead of the grant date fair value of equity-based awards granted in 2015, reflects the actual "take-home" value of equity-based awards that vested during 2015, as reported below under "Stock Vested in 2015."

(3)
Instead of the grant date fair value of equity-based awards granted in 2015, reflects (a) all outstanding performance-based RSUs granted during 2015, calculated using the Company's $32.56 stock price on December 31, 2015 and assuming 100% of all such outstanding performance-based RSUs vest (which is the maximum potential vesting level for the awards, with the actual amount ultimately vesting dependent upon our relative TSR performance in comparison to the relevant peer group during the applicable performance period), and (b) all outstanding time-based RSUs granted during 2015 and unvested as of December 31, 2015 based on the Company's $32.56 stock price on December 31, 2015, in each case, as reported below under "Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015." See chart below in this section for additional detail on our performance-based RSU awards granted in 2015 and on performance-based RSU awards granted in prior years that were settled during 2015 or remain outstanding as of December 31, 2015. The value of all outstanding, unvested performance-based RSUs and time-based RSUs (including awards granted prior to 2015) as of December 31, 2015, calculated based on the Company's $32.56 stock price on that date and assuming 100% of all outstanding performance-based RSUs vest, is shown in the "Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015" table.

The Compensation Committee believes that realized compensation is more representative of compensation actually earned than the compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table and that realizable compensation is a reflection of the total potential compensation that may be earned by an executive, which also supports our compensation objectives of motivating and retaining executives. Because of our strong operational, strategic and TSR performance in 2015, our CEO earned 176% of his target bonus amount under his annual incentive award. As a result of our stock price and our relative TSR performance, the actual realized and realizable value of our RSU awards as of December 31, 2015, was more than the CEO's target grant date opportunity, which reinforces the program's alignment with stockholder interests and Company performance, as reflected by our TSR for the period.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        37

Table of Contents

The following table shows the TSR ranking of the performance-based RSUs granted to our CEO since 2010:

  Performance
Period
Start Date		   Relative TSR
Measurement
Period		    Number of
Performance-
Based RSUs
Awarded		   Payout Range   TSR Rank (as of
December 31, 2015
for outstanding
awards at 2015
year-end)		   RSUs Vested/
Unvested/Forfeited
as of 12/31/15		  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
  March 2010 ​ Apr. 15, 2013 to
Apr. 15, 2015 (Monthly)
 		​ ​34,800 ​ 0% to 100% ​ 13 ​ 12,180/22,620/22,620 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
  March 2011   Apr. 15, 2014 to
Apr. 15, 2016 (Monthly)		    35,300   0% to 100%   8   19,415/15,885/0  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​
​   March 2012 ​ Apr. 15, 2015 to
Apr. 15, 2017 (Monthly)
 		​ ​51,000 ​ 0% to 100% ​ 6 ​ 35,700/15,300/0 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
  March 2013   Apr. 15, 2016 to
Apr. 15, 2018 (Monthly)		    81,900   0% to 100%   1   0/81,900/0  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​
​   March 2014 ​ Apr. 15, 2016 to
Apr. 15, 2017 (Monthly)
 		​ ​98,040 ​ 0% to 100% ​ 1 ​ 0/98,040/0 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
  January 2015   Jan. 1, 2017 to
Dec. 31, 2017 (Quarterly)		    138,210   0% to 100%   1   0/138,210/0  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​

III. 2015 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

The following is a discussion of the Compensation Committee's analysis and specific decisions with respect to the direct and indirect compensation elements provided to our NEOs in 2015. Variances in the amount of direct compensation awarded to each NEO generally reflect differences in individual responsibility and experience as well as the compensation levels provided to officers in comparable positions in our 2015 Compensation Peer Group.

Compensation Peer Group Analysis

In October 2014, Meridian, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, provided the Compensation Committee with an analysis of our executive compensation relative to prevailing compensation levels at industry peers. This analysis included adjustments for company size and our relative enterprise value among the identified peer companies (see footnote 1 to the below chart). The Compensation Committee referenced this analysis in its January and February 2015 meetings, where it determined 2015 base salary levels, 2015 target annual incentive award opportunities and 2015 RSU grants for the NEOs. The peer companies selected for purposes of this analysis (Compensation Peer Group) were:

2015 Compensation Peer Group (1)
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation​Laredo Petroleum Inc.*​Southwestern Energy Company​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​
Cimarex Energy Co.Oasis Petroleum Inc.*Ultra Petroleum Corp.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​
​  Concho Resources, Inc.​QEP Resources, Inc.​Whiting Petroleum Corporation​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Denbury Resources Inc.Range Resources CorporationWPX Energy Inc.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  EP Energy Corp.*​SandRidge Energy Inc.*​​​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​
Energen Corp.*SM Energy Co.*
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​
(1)
Due to recent changes to the Company's size and scope and in order for the Company to rank at or close to the median of the Compensation Peer Group in enterprise value, market capitalization and assets, the Compensation Committee removed Pioneer Natural Resources Co., Continental Resources Inc. and Noble Energy, Inc. from the Compensation Peer Group for 2015. Companies marked with a "*" were added to the Compensation Peer Group for 2015.

For a discussion of the compensation of our CEO and other NEOs compared to the 2015 Compensation Peer Group, please see "Executive Compensation Philosophy and Components – Direct Compensation Components" and "– Pay for Performance."

The Compensation Peer Group was developed taking into consideration peer company metrics such as market capitalization, enterprise value, comparability of asset portfolio, revenues and the availability of compensation

​

38        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

data, and is reviewed by the Compensation Committee periodically for reasonableness. For 2015, the Compensation Peer Group was different from the group of peer companies used in evaluating our relative TSR performance for purposes of the performance-based RSU awards (TSR Performance Peer Group), although some peer companies do overlap between the two groups.

Please see "– 2016 Compensation Program – 2016 Peer Group Changes" for a discussion of the Company's comprehensive peer company review for purposes of determining the 2016 Compensation Peer Group.

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee reviews executive officer base salary levels on an annual basis, typically at the beginning of the year, with a goal of providing competitive, fixed cash compensation, while rewarding Company and individual performance primarily through annual incentive awards and long-term equity-based incentive awards. The Compensation Committee generally maintains executive base salaries near the median level of salaries for comparable positions in the Compensation Peer Group. In light of the significant decline in commodity prices during the second half of 2014, and the uncertainty surrounding future commodity prices and the corresponding impact on the oil and gas industry at the beginning of 2015, the Compensation Committee decided not to increase the base salaries of our NEOs for 2015. The 2015 base salaries for our NEOs, which remained unchanged from the 2014 base salary levels, were as follows:

 

 

Named Executive Officer

    2015 Base Salary  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Boothby

 ​ $850,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Massaro

   $420,000  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

​  

 

Mr. Packer

 ​ $540,750 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Dunn

   $382,500  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

​  

 

Mr. Jasek

 ​ $400,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

Annual Incentive Awards

For 2015, our NEOs were eligible to earn annual incentive awards under the Company's Annual Incentive Plan (2015 AIP), based upon the level of achievement across a select set of performance measures aligned with shareholder value creation, advancement of the Company's strategic goals, and the NEO's individual performance for the year. Generally, the 2015 AIP was administered as described below.

Target Bonus Amounts

After reviewing the 2015 Compensation Peer Group data with Meridian, in February 2015, the Compensation Committee set the target bonus percentages and amounts for each NEO for the 2015 AIP, with a maximum potential payout of 200% of each NEO's target bonus amount (which the Compensation Committee decided, based on the peer group data and market conditions, should remain at the same levels as in effect for 2014) as follows:

 

 

Named Executive Officer

    Target Bonus
Percentage		    Target Bonus
Amount		  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Boothby

 ​ ​120% ​ $1,020,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Massaro

    100%   $420,000  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Mr. Packer

 ​ ​100% ​ $540,750 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Mr. Dunn

    85%   $325,125  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Mr. Jasek

 ​ ​85% ​ $340,000 ​
​  ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        39

Table of Contents

2015 Company Performance Measures

Applicable Company performance measures and goals were established in March 2015 based on three categories:

    •
    Category I (Operational Relative Measures – 45%) – consistent annual operational performance measures that are evaluated each year,

    •
    Category II (Operational Near-Term Measures – 30%) – near-term measures that are aligned to the current operational environment and may vary from year to year, and

    •
    Category III (Strategic Measurement – 25%) – strategic priorities that are agreed upon by the Compensation Committee with management at the beginning of the applicable year and evaluated by the Committee (see pages 42-43 for further explanation of these strategic priorities).

The Compensation Committee determined the performance measures to be used for all three categories, as well as the weighting and goal setting with respect to all measures, with the Board's Operations and Reserves Committee (O&R Committee) serving in an advisory role with respect to inputs for the operational measures in Categories I and II. For purposes of the 2015 AIP, the Compensation Committee determined that the operational performance measures should comprise in the aggregate 75% of the total Company performance measures, with the strategic measurement comprising 25% of the total, which represented a change from the 2014 program when operational performance measures comprised 60% of the total Company performance measures and the strategic measurement comprised 40% of the total (specifically, Category I operational measures increased from 30% of the total Company performance measures to 45% for 2015). The Compensation Committee made this reallocation in order to focus the NEOs more specifically on operational goals that drive

​

40        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

shareholder value creation. For 2015, the Compensation Committee selected the following Company performance measures and weightings for the 2015 AIP:

Performance Measures (1)WeightingWhat It IsWhy We Use It
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​
Relative performance goals​​​Operational relative measures that are consistently evaluated each year​Provide a strong correlation to stock price performance and mirror the Company's financial disclosures​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Domestic Production

15%Domestic production (sales + lease fuel)Critical to our future success, these are two primary measures by which stockholders measure our performance
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​

Domestic Proved Reserves Replacement Ratio

15%Volumes attributable to new proved locations divided by production
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Discretionary Cash Flow

15%Total Company discretionary cash flowEncourages adequate liquidity and balances the relationship between cash flow from operations and hedge revenues with annual capital investments
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Near-term performance goals​​​Operational near-term measures that are aligned to the current operational environment​Aligns with the near-term business plan and annual initiatives​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Domestic Controllable Expense per Unit of Production

10%Controllable cash expenses (lease & operating expense + major expense + cash G&A) divided by salesControlling cash expenses improves margins and rates of return
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Domestic Finding & Development (F&D) Costs per BOE of Proved Developed Reserve Addition

10%Capital (drill, complete, recomplete, hook-up, injection) divided by proved developed reserve additionsKey driver of long-term success in our investments
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Safety, Environmental, Regulatory & Compliance (SERC)

10%Incorporates trailing three year average consolidated total reported incident rate (TRIR), contractor TRIR, oil spill rate and produced fluid spill rate (each weighted 25%)Encourages long-term decision making to benefit the health and safety of our employees and contractors, as well as environmental impact
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Strategic performance goals​​​Long-term financial, value creation and other strategic measures and milestones communicated to senior management​Provide tension to operational outcomes and flexibility in assessing overall Company performance​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Strategic Measurement

25%Priorities included preservation of financial strength; our stock price performance; maintenance of integrity of approved strategic plan; effective handling of unforeseen events, including the current operating environment; talent management, succession planning and personnel development; and personal leadership and communicationsProvide evaluation of the Company's performance on the advancement of objectives related to the Company's strategy for 2015, including those related to financial strength, cost savings, operational flexibility, organizational management and stockholder return
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
(1)
For a more detailed explanation of how we calculate these non-GAAP measures, please refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement.
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        41

Table of Contents

2015 Annual Incentive Plan Goal Determination

The 2015 AIP included threshold, target and stretch (maximum) goals for each Company operational performance measure (Category I & II), with a corresponding payout range (known as the AIP Factor range), as follows:

 

 

Operational Performance Measure

   2015 Actual
Performance		   2015 Threshold
Goal (0.5x)		   2015 Target
Goal (1.0x)		   2015 Maximum
Goal (2.0x)		  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Domestic Production

 ​ 50.6 MMBOE ​ 47.5 MMBOE ​ 49.0 MMBOE ​ 51.5 MMBOE ​
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Domestic Proved Reserves Replacement Ratio

   236%   117%   150%   215%  
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Discretionary Cash Flow (in millions)

 ​ $1,171 ​ $1,000 ​ $1,190 ​ $1,350 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

 

Domestic Controllable Expense per Unit

   $9.66   $11.00   $10.30   $9.80  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​

​  

 

Domestic F&D per BOE

 ​ $12.37 ​ $14.60 ​ $13.40 ​ $12.20 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

 

SERC

   200   50   100   200  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​

Generally, target goals for the operational measures are based on the Company's approved budget and operating plan for the year (Plan) and reflect significant performance improvement relative to 2014 outcomes taking into account the commodity price environment and subject to adjustment to account for significant macro environment or Company-specific impacts. Threshold and stretch goals for the operational measures are intended to, respectively, reflect the minimal level of performance at which the Compensation Committee believes payout is warranted and challenge management to achieve exceptional performance. During each scheduled Operations & Reserves Committee meeting and Compensation Committee meeting there is robust dialogue related to monitoring Company performance against the established annual Company measures.

Goals and expectations with respect to the strategic measurement portion of the 2015 AIP and the underlying strategic priorities for the year are the responsibility of the Compensation Committee, in dialogue with the Operations & Reserves Committee and management, in order to further align NEOs with the Company's long-term strategy and value creation. The Compensation Committee also establishes threshold (0%), target (100%) and stretch (200%) payout ranges for the strategic measurement portion (Category III), which provide a general guideline for the Compensation Committee members as they each evaluate and determine the extent to which the strategic measurement portion has been achieved for each year. Because the strategic measurement portion is qualitative in nature, success does not necessarily depend on achieving a particular strategic priority or priorities; rather, success may be evaluated based on past norms, expectations and unanticipated obstacles or opportunities that arise.

The Compensation Committee assessed the Company's performance against the strategic priorities comprising the strategic measurement portion of the 2015 AIP. The 2015 strategic priorities and a related management assessment rationale presented to the Committee are set forth below:

•
Preservation of financial strength


Entering 2015, the Company took proactive steps in response to low oil prices to enhance liquidity and ensure a strong capital structure. The Company was successfully recapitalized in early 2015 through three significant transactions – equity, new senior notes at attractive interest rates with proceeds used to retire near-term existing debt and an upsize and extension of the Company's credit facility. We ended 2015 with an undrawn credit facility and borrowings of only approximately $39 million on our money market line of credit.

•
Company stock price performance


By effectively implementing its near-term business objectives, Newfield's stock led all E&P stocks on the S&P 500 Index and was up 20% year over year compared to an average decrease of approximately 45% for the other companies in our 2015 Compensation Peer Group.

•
Maintain integrity of approved strategic plan


In 2015, the Company's business plan focused on several key elements:

•
A high-grading and reduction of capital investments over 2014 levels;

•
Reduced cash operating expenses;
​

42        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

    •
    Efficiency gains in drilling and completion operations; and

    •
    Opportunistic capture of attractive acreage in the Anadarko Basin.


The Company's performance exceeded goal on each of the above measures. Newfield reduced annual capital investments by 40% over the prior year (excludes lease additions and acquisitions) and high-graded its investments largely into the Anadarko and Williston Basins where rates of return are the highest in a lower commodity price environment. Cash operating expenses were significantly reduced during the year through lower service costs and innovative applications in the field to reduce costs, particularly in the STACK, and improve base production and margins. Many of these cost reductions are related to efficiency gains in drilling and completion operations and are expected to be sustainable in the event of commodity price recovery. In addition, at year-end 2015, the Anadarko Basin comprised 53% of our total proved reserves, and we had interest in more than 315,000 net acres in SCOOP and STACK.

•
Effectiveness in handling unforeseen events


Adaptability is a core competency of our organization. This measure relates to our ability to handle certain "unforeseen events" during the year that would otherwise negatively impact performance against our business plan. Specific examples in 2015 include:

•
Lower than expected oil and natural gas prices were offset by more than $500 million in hedge revenues. An additional estimated $270 million in hedging revenues is expected in 2016, calculated at strip oil and gas prices in late February 2016.

•
Higher than expected production in all four of the Company's onshore operating areas and in offshore China allowed the Company to exceed its beginning of the year projections. Negative impacts related to refinery turnarounds, unplanned maintenance on third-party mid-stream gathering facilities and other negative impacts which were all mitigated by superior performance throughout the enterprise.

•
Proactive steps were taken to adapt our organizational structure to create G&A expense efficiencies and to ensure improved future margins and profitability. Through a reduction in force in early 2015 and office consolidations, Newfield's headcount was reduced by more than 20%. The Company also closed two offices.

•
Talent management, succession planning and personnel development


We took proactive steps during the year to right-size our organization and deploy additional personnel to our most active operating areas. Newfield management and the Board worked together to update a detailed succession planning tool and tailored leadership development programs were developed and implemented. We also built internal career progression resources and leveraged our financial strength in a low price environment to increase campus recruiting program to meet the talent needs of our future. This effort will help ensure the availability and readiness of future leadership and continued strong performance of the organization.

•
Personal leadership and communication


Management and the Board continued to have frequent, constructive and interactive dialogue throughout the year as key financial, operational and organizational restructuring objectives were implemented, and conducted an extensive outreach program to key stockholders and other stakeholders. In addition, our executive team provided clear, effective and relevant communication to our workforce on our key initiatives to ensure alignment with our near-term strategy and corporate vision.

Overall, the Compensation Committee determined that performance with respect to the strategic measurement portion of the 2015 AIP substantially exceeded expectations based on its evaluation of results across each of the priorities identified above. This determination occurred with the background and ongoing context of refinements to the 2015 strategic priorities and continued discussion and active dialogue among the Compensation Committee, the O&R Committee and management about the strategic priorities and performance, including routine reports, presentations and communications containing performance updates throughout the year.

The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the O&R Committee with respect to inputs on the operational measures in Categories I and II, evaluated the overall performance of the Company and the NEOs for

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        43

Table of Contents

2015, and then calculated the collective AIP Factor based on the weighted average of all the Company performance measures, as follows:

 
 Performance Measures
  
 Weighting
  
 2015
Performance
Achieved
  
 AIP Factor
  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Domestic Production

 ​ 15% ​ 50.6 MMBOE ​ 1.63 ​
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

 

Domestic Proved Reserves Replacement Ratio

   15%   236%   2.00  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​

​  

 

Discretionary Cash Flow

 ​ 15% ​ $1,171 ​ 0.95 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Domestic Controllable Expense per Unit

   10%   $9.66   2.00  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Domestic F&D per BOE

 ​ 10% ​ $12.37 ​ 1.86 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

SERC (1)

   10%   200   2.00  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Strategic Measurement

 ​ 25% ​ See above ​ 2.00 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Collective AIP Factor

           1.76  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​
(1)
In determining the outcome for SERC performance, the Compensation Committee considered 25% year-over-year reduction in completions TRIR, 11% year-over-year reduction in drilling TRIRs, and a 46% year-over-year decrease in oil spill events.

Individual Performance Measures

The Compensation Committee may increase or decrease the ultimate annual incentive award payment an NEO would otherwise receive with respect to the Company performance measures based on the Committee's assessment of the NEO's individual performance for the year, taking into consideration various criteria including the NEO's impact during the year and his overall value to our Company, and specifically considering the NEO's leadership skills, impact on strategic initiatives, performance in his primary area of responsibility, role in succession planning and development, and other intangible qualities that contribute to our success. For 2015, the Compensation Committee made the following assessments with respect to each NEO's individual performance:


Name

2015 Individual Performance
Measure Assessment

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

​  

Mr. Boothby

​Mr. Boothby continued his strong and proactive leadership and management across our organization. His vision was the driving force in the Company's ability to continue its multi-year streak of solid execution against targets and objectives, with Newfield ending 2015 as the top E&P stock in the S&P 500 Index.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Mr. Massaro

Mr. Massaro was instrumental in our successful recapitalization efforts in the first quarter of 2015 and provided vital leadership in designing our 2015 operating plan and strategy.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

​  

Mr. Packer

​Mr. Packer continued his leadership of our operating teams, leading to outstanding production and operating results despite an extremely challenging commodity price and industry environment. He was also key in the execution of our Company reorganization.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Mr. Dunn

Mr. Dunn's leadership with respect to the Company's development cost reductions and outstanding production and reserve results was instrumental to our success in 2015.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

​  

Mr. Jasek

​Mr. Jasek successfully transitioned to Senior VP of Operations during 2015, provided leadership in executing key initiatives, including our Company reorganization, and raised the level of technical oversight across the organization.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​

44        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

2015 Annual Incentive Award Payout Determinations

Based on the foregoing, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2015 annual incentive award payout amounts for the NEOs:

 
 Name
  
 Target Bonus
Amount
(% of Base Salary)
  
 x
  
 Collective
AIP Factor
  
 +/-
  
 Individual
Performance
Determination
  
 =
  
 Actual Annual
Incentive Award
Payout
  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Mr. Boothby

 ​ $1,020,000 (120%) ​ ​ ​    ​      ​ $4,800 ​ ​ ​ $1,800,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Mr. Massaro

   $420,000 (100%)                $100,800       $840,000  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Mr. Packer

 ​ $540,750 (100%) ​ ​ ​  1.76 ​ ​ ​ $48,280 ​ ​ ​ $1,000,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Mr. Dunn

   $325,125 (85%)                $27,780       $600,000  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Mr. Jasek

 ​ $340,000 (85%) ​ ​ ​    ​ ​ ​ $16,600 ​ ​ ​ $615,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards

Each year, we provide our NEOs long-term equity-based incentive award grants. The Compensation Committee determines each February the amount and mix of long-term equity-based incentive awards granted to the NEOs and believes that long-term equity-based incentive awards should include both time- and performance-based awards. By providing both types of awards each year, the Compensation Committee seeks to balance the retention incentive provided by time-based awards with the strong tie to relative long-term TSR provided by the performance-based awards. Currently, the Compensation Committee makes long-term equity-based incentive awards in the form of restricted stock units, or RSUs.

The ratio of time- to performance-based RSUs awarded each year varies by officer, based on the officer's ability to influence overall corporate results. Additionally, the number of time-based RSUs awarded is equally split between stock-settled RSUs and cash-settled RSUs in order to preserve available shares under our 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The following graphs reflect the mix of time- and performance-based RSUs for the NEOs for 2015 as a percentage of total award value. For 2015, the Compensation Committee determined to increase the portion of the total annual award that is allocated to performance-based RSUs for Messrs. Dunn and Jasek from 34% to 40% in order to further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders.

GRAPHIC

With respect to the total long-term equity-based incentive award amount granted to each NEO each year, the Compensation Committee generally considers estimated targets for compensation, the relative value of each compensation element, expense of such awards and impact on dilution. The Compensation Committee intends that long-term equity-based incentive award amounts be made at a level where NEOs will achieve median pay in relation to the 2015 Compensation Peer Group if the Company's performance falls at the median of its peers,

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        45

Table of Contents

with the ability to achieve above-median pay for above-median performance. Accordingly, for 2015, the Compensation Committee evaluated information provided by Meridian on the range of long-term equity-based incentive award opportunities awarded by the 2015 Compensation Peer Group companies, along with the Company's recent performance and the role of each NEO in achieving Company objectives. The Compensation Committee also evaluated the CEO's recommendations for long-term equity-based incentive award amounts for the other NEOs. Based on these evaluations, the Compensation Committee approved the following time- and performance-based RSU awards for 2015:

 
 Name
  
 Award
Guideline
(Multiple of
Base Salary)
  
 Total Award
Opportunity (1)
  
 Number of
Time-Based
RSUs
(Stock-Settled)
  
 Number of
Time-Based
RSUs
(Cash-Settled)
  
 Number of
Performance-
Based RSUs
  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Boothby            

 ​ 6x ​ $5,100,272 ​ ​48,930 ​ ​48,930 ​ ​138,210 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

 

 

Mr. Massaro

   4x   $2,000,905    19,200    19,200    54,210  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Mr. Packer

 ​ 5x ​ $3,000,298 ​ ​28,785 ​ ​28,785 ​ ​81,300 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Dunn

   3x   $1,200,488    13,815    13,815    26,040  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​​

​  

 

Mr. Jasek

 ​ 3x ​ $1,000,613 ​ ​11,520 ​ ​11,520 ​ ​21,690 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​
(1)
Reflects the estimated aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards based on (i) the December 2014 average per share stock price (for the time-based RSUs) and (ii) an estimated grant date fair value determined applying a Monte Carlo valuation using the December 2014 average per share stock price in accordance with applicable accounting principles (for the performance-based RSUs). Because they are estimates, these dollar amounts may vary from the values disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table and 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. See the footnotes to those tables for further information regarding the methodology for determining the values of the awards for purposes of those tables.

Time-Based RSUs

The time-based RSUs (both stock-settled and cash-settled awards) granted in February 2015 vest in four substantially equal annual installments on August 15, 2015, August 15, 2016, August 15, 2017 and February 15, 2018, subject to continuous employment. Additional information regarding these awards, including treatment upon certain terminations of employment or the occurrence of a change of control, is provided below under "Executive Compensation Tables – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control."

Performance-Based RSUs

The performance-based RSUs granted in February 2015 are subject to both continued service and relative TSR vesting conditions and provide NEOs the opportunity to earn between 0% and 100% of the number of performance-based RSUs awarded. The TSR vesting conditions measure our total cumulative stockholder return for at least two years, and up to three years, relative to a peer group approved by the Compensation Committee (TSR Performance Peer Group). The Compensation Committee believes that relative TSR is an appropriate long-term performance metric because it generally reflects all elements of a company's performance, provides a reliable means to measure relative performance and provides the best alignment of the interests of management and the Company's stockholders. The structure of the 2015 performance-based RSU awards is substantially similar to prior year awards, except for the use of a quarterly (instead of monthly) determination date during the last year of the three year performance period and use of the EPX Index as an alternate in the event a peer company is privately acquired during the performance period.

​

46        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

For 2015, the TSR Performance Peer Group includes the Company and the following companies and indices (or their successors, if a peer company is acquired by a public company):


2015 TSR Performance Peer Group (1)

​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.​Energen Corp.​SandRidge Energy, Inc.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Chesapeake Energy Corp.EP Energy Corp.SM Energy Co.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Cimarex Energy Co.​Laredo Petroleum, Inc.​Southwestern Energy Co.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Concho Resources, Inc.Oasis Petroleum Inc.Ultra Petroleum Corp.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Continental Resources, Inc.​QEP Resources, Inc.​Whiting Petroleum Corp.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​
Denbury Resources Inc.Range Resources Corp.WPX Energy Inc.
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Devon Energy Corp.​​​​​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
(1)
The EPX Index will be used as a peer replacement in the event a member of the TSR Performance Peer Group ceases to be publicly traded during the applicable performance period due to acquisition by a private company.

Vesting of the 2015 performance-based RSU awards is determined based on the TSR of each company or index in the 2015 TSR Performance Peer Group for the performance period beginning January 1, 2015 and ending on the applicable determination date, which is the last day of each quarter beginning on March 31, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017, with actual vesting dates potentially occurring quarterly from April 15, 2017 through January 15, 2018, subject to continued employment through any actual vesting date. Payment of vested performance-based RSUs will be made in shares of Company stock and will correspond with the highest rank achieved during the final four calendar quarters of the performance period. The percentage of the performance-based RSUs that may potentially vest each determination date is calculated by determining our TSR rank among the TSR Performance Peer Group as follows:

 
  
  
 Rank
  
 Percentage of performance-based
RSUs earned
  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

First Quartile

 ​ 1-5 ​ 100% ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

 

     6   70%  
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

     7   65%  
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Second Quartile

   8   60%  
​  ​​​​​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

     9   55%  
​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

 

     10   50%  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

 

​

 ​ 11 ​ 45% ​
​  ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​

 

 

​

 ​ 12 ​ 40% ​
​  ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

 

 

Third Quartile

 ​ 13 ​ 35% ​
​  ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

 

 

​

 ​ 14 ​ 30% ​
​  ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​

 

 

​

 ​ 15 ​ 25% ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​

 

 

Fourth Quartile

   16-20   0%  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

For purposes of these calculations, total cumulative stockholder return, or TSR, as of a particular determination date means the rate of return (expressed as a percentage) achieved with respect to the primary equity security of each company or index in the TSR Performance Peer Group (including our Company) if: (i) $100 was invested in each security or index on January 1, 2015, assuming a purchase price equal to the average closing price of the security or index for all trading days in December 2014, (ii) all dividends received with respect to a particular security for any record date that occurs during the period beginning January 1, 2015 and ending on the last day of the determination period were reinvested in the security (using the closing price of the security on the record date), and (iii) assuming the valuation of such security or index at the end of the determination period is based on the average closing price for all trading days in last month of the determination period.

Additional information regarding these awards, including treatment upon certain terminations of employment or the occurrence of a change of control, is provided below under "Executive Compensation Tables – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control."

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        47

Table of Contents

Other Compensation

In addition to the elements of total direct compensation described above, our executive compensation program includes other elements of compensation that are designed primarily to attract, motivate and retain executives critical to our long-term success and to provide a competitive compensation structure overall.


Element

Description and Purpose

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Change of Control Severance Plan and Severance Agreements​

•

Our Change of Control Severance Plan and Severance Agreements with certain executives are intended to provide financial security and an industry-competitive compensation package for our executives. This additional security helps ensure that these officers remain focused on our performance and the continued creation of stockholder value throughout any change of control transaction rather than on the potential uncertainties associated with their own employment.

•

The Change of Control Severance Plan and the Severance Agreements are "double trigger" agreements that generally provide certain cash payments (other than payments under our Stock Plan) to the executive if their employment is terminated during a two or three year protection period following a change of control. For a description of these arrangements as in effect during 2015, please see "Executive Compensation Tables – Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control."

​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
401(k) Plan

•

All employees of the Company are eligible to participate in and receive up to an 8% Company matching contribution to our 401(k) Plan, which is intended to provide financial security upon retirement.

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Deferred Compensation Plan​

•

All officers are eligible to participate in and receive Company contributions to our Deferred Compensation Plan, which is intended to provide competitive retirement planning benefits to attract and retain skilled management.

​
​  ​​

•

The Deferred Compensation Plan allows an eligible executive to defer up to 90% of his or her salary and all of his or her bonus on an annual basis. We make a matching contribution for up to 8% of the executive's base salary. For an explanation of the major features of the Deferred Compensation Plan, please see "Executive Compensation Tables – Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2015."

​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)

•

Participating employees, including our executives, are eligible to purchase annually up to $21,250 of Company common stock at a discount.

•

The ESPP is intended to encourage an equity stake in the Company, aligning employee interests with those of our stockholders.

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Health and Wellness Plans​

•

Executives are eligible to receive available health and other wellness benefits, including medical, dental, life and disability insurance, on the same basis as our other employees. Executives also receive a Company-paid annual physical examination.

​
​  ​​

•

Our health and wellness plans are intended to provide a competitive, broad-based employee benefits structure and to promote the wellness of our executives and other employees.

​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Perquisites

•

We provide reimbursement for fitness and business club dues to promote the wellness and business relationships of our employees and for annual executive physical exams.

•

Beginning in 2016, officers (including our NEOs) are eligible for up to $17,500 per year for financial planning services upon their election.

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​

48        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

IV. 2016 COMPENSATION PROGRAM

As for prior years, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian to review the overall competitiveness of the Company's executive compensation programs for 2016, with continued focus on ensuring the alignment of management compensation with performance and the Company's strategy generally.

Based on stockholder and management feedback, the Compensation Committee requested that Meridian assist in repositioning the Company's executive officer compensation program to (i) provide greater incentive and reward opportunities for exceptional Company performance, (ii) support retention of key talent, (iii) improve stockholder support of the Compensation Committee and the Company's executive compensation programs and (iv) manage officer compensation in a framework that the Board and the executives understand the same way. While this process resulted in minimal changes to the Company's approach to executive officer base salaries or annual incentive awards for 2016, the Compensation Committee did adopt changes to the Company's long-term equity-based incentive award programs for 2016, including the following:

    •
    While performance-based RSUs will continue to be earned based on company performance as measured by relative TSR against the TSR Performance Peer Group, the two-year performance period will be replaced with a three-year performance period and the quarterly vesting opportunities will be replaced with a single vesting opportunity that will occur at the end of the three-year performance period.

    •
    Performance-based RSUs will be granted at a target level (or 100%) with the final number of shares earned ranging between 0% and 200% of the target level, again based on company performance as measured by relative TSR.

    •
    In the event of a change in control, holders of outstanding performance-based RSUs will vest on the closing date of the change in control based on actual relative TSR performance through that date.

The Compensation Committee believes that the redesign of the Company's long-term equity-based incentive award program for 2016 will better align executive officer compensation with stockholder interests, provide a greater upside incentive to management and motivate them to increase Company performance.

In addition, due to the Company's strong operating results and increased stockholder returns in 2015 and following the salary freeze instituted for 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that a merit increase to the base salary rates of our NEOs for 2016 was warranted. In determining the amount of the base salary increases for 2016, the Compensation Committee considered the current 2016 outlook and continued commodity price declines, the pay levels and expected rate of increases in base pay of executives at the Compensation Peer Group companies, and the rate of pay increases for our non-executive officers.

 
 Name
  
 2015 Salary
  
 Increase %
  
 Increase $
  
 2016 Salary
(Effective
February 28, 2016)
  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Boothby           

 ​ $850,000 ​ ​— ​ ​— ​ $850,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Massaro

   $420,000    6.0%   $25,200   $445,200  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Packer

 ​ $540,750 ​ ​— ​ ​— ​ $540,750 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Dunn

   $382,500    3.0%   $11,475   $393,975  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Mr. Jasek

 ​ $400,000 ​ ​— ​ ​— ​ $400,000 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

2016 Peer Group Changes

The Company's successful execution of its strategic plan over the past few years has elevated its competitive position. Due to the continued evolving changes to the Company's financial strength, operational characteristics, size and scope, management, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, undertook a comprehensive review and analysis of the Company's identified group of peer companies for purposes of both compensation and relative TSR performance awards. The Company continues to believe that maintaining two separate peer groups – a Compensation Peer Group and a TSR Performance Peer Group – is appropriate since the two

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        49

Table of Contents

groups serve different objectives. For 2016, the Compensation Peer Group is intended to reflect North American, onshore E&P companies with similar size, scale, enterprise value, market capitalization, activity level and operations as the Company and that compete with the Company for executive talent.


2016 Compensation Peer Group (1)

​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Cimarex Energy Co.​Energen Corp.​SM Energy Co.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Concho Resources Inc.Marathon Oil Corp.*Southwestern Energy Co.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Continental Resources, Inc. *​Noble Energy Inc.*​WPX Energy Inc.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
EP Energy Corp.QEP Resources, Inc.Whiting Petroleum Corp.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Encana Corp. *​Range Resources Corp.​​​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
(1)
Due to recent changes to the Company's size and scope and in order for the Company to rank at or close to the median of the Compensation Peer Group in enterprise value, market capitalization and assets, the Compensation Committee removed Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Denbury Resources Inc., Laredo Petroleum Inc., Oasis Petroleum Inc., SandRidge Energy Inc., and Ultra Petroleum Corp. from the 2015 Compensation Peer Group. Companies marked with a "*" were added to the Compensation Peer Group for 2016.

For 2016, the TSR Performance Peer Group reflects a relevant industry cross section of primarily North American, onshore E&P companies with a liquids weighted investment strategy and companies with which the Company competes from an investor perspective.


2016 TSR Performance Peer Group (1)

​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Bill Barrett Corp. *​Energen Corp.​PDC Energy, Inc. *​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. *EP Energy Corp.Pioneer Natural Resources Co. *
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Chesapeake Energy Corp.​Jones Energy, Inc. *​SM Energy Co.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​
Cimarex Energy Co.Marathon Oil Corp. *QEP Resources, Inc.
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Concho Resources Inc.​Matador Resources Co. *​Whiting Petroleum Corp.​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
Continental Resources Inc.Noble Energy Inc.*WPX Energy Inc.
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  ��Devon Energy Corp.​​​​​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
(1)
The Compensation Committee revised the TSR Performance Peer Group, removing the following companies: Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Denbury Resources Inc., Laredo Petroleum Inc., Oasis Petroleum Inc., Range Resources Corporation, SandRidge Energy Inc., Southwestern Energy Company and Ultra Petroleum Corp. Companies marked with a "*" were added to the TSR Performance Peer Group for 2016.

The Compensation Committee believes that the 2016 Compensation Peer Group and the 2016 TSR Performance Peer Group are properly constituted to allow the Company to provide competitive and effective compensation to its executive officers for 2016 and future years.

V. COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Compensation Committee believes that meaningful stock ownership by our officers is important in aligning management's interests with the interests of our stockholders. We have implemented stock ownership guidelines that require officers to maintain consistent stock ownership in the Company based on a multiple of the executive's annual base salary as set forth below:


Position

Ownership
Requirement

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

​  

President and CEO

​   5 times base salary​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

COO, CFO, Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents

   3 times base salary
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

​  

Vice Presidents – Business Unit Leader

​   2 times base salary​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Vice Presidents – General Counsel, Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer and Others

1.5 times base salary
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​

Executives have up to five years to meet the stock ownership guidelines. As of year-end 2015, all NEOs met our stock ownership guidelines.

​

50        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

Incentive Compensation Clawback

Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the "Dodd-Frank Act") requires the SEC to direct national securities exchanges to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that fails to develop and implement a clawback policy. Although these rules have not been finalized, in March 2016, the Board approved and adopted the Newfield Exploration Company Clawback Policy (the "Clawback Policy"). Under the Clawback Policy, if the Board determines, after conducting a reasonable investigation, that any wrongful conduct (defined as fraud, gross negligence or intentional misconduct) committed by any current or former officer or other employee who received an award or payout under the 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan or the Annual Incentive Plan was a significant contributing factor to the Company having to restate all or a portion of its publicly reported consolidated financial statements due to material non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement under the U.S. federal securities laws (which shall exclude any restatement caused by a change in applicable accounting rules, policy or interpretations), then the Board shall have the right to take, or cause to be taken, in its sole discretion, such action, to the extent permitted by applicable law, as it deems necessary to remedy the wrongful conduct and seek to prevent its recurrence. Remedies include the reimbursement, reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment of such awards or gains realized from such wrongful conduct.

In addition, under the 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee may require the forfeiture of equity awards (including vested awards that have been exercised or settled and all net proceeds realized with respect to previously granted awards) if it determines that an award holder engaged in certain bad acts, such as fraud, embezzlement, or the violation of any restrictive covenant agreement, and may require awards granted with performance goals to be subject to any policy we adopt relating to the recovery of incentive awards in the event the associated performance goals were not actually achieved. Further, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates that the CEO and CFO reimburse the Company for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation paid to them in a year following the issuance of financial statements that are later required to be restated as a result of misconduct. During 2015, we did not have a stand-alone clawback policy in place.

Prohibited Transactions

We prohibit executive officers from buying, selling or writing puts, calls or other options related to Company stock. None of our executives has entered into hedging transactions involving our stock. We also prohibit executives from holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock as collateral for a loan.

Tax Deductibility Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to a public company for compensation paid to its CEO or any of its three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the CFO) to the extent that the compensation of any of these officers exceeds $1 million in any calendar year. Qualifying "performance-based compensation" is not subject to this deduction limit.

Our policy is to have a compensation program that recognizes and rewards performance that increases stockholder value and, to the extent consistent with this policy, to seek to maintain the favorable tax treatment of that compensation. Currently, the performance-based RSUs that the Compensation Committee began granting in 2010 and the portion of the annual incentive awards that is based on operational Company performance measures are intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" for purposes of Section 162(m). We believe, however, that under some circumstances, such as to attract or retain key executives or to recognize outstanding performance, it is in the Company's and our stockholders' best interests to provide compensation to selected executives even if it is not deductible.

Compensation Policies and Practices Related to Risk Management

The Compensation Committee has discussed and analyzed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation programs and believes that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk taking.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        51

Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee, with Newfield’s independent auditors all communicationsthe assistance of Meridian, arrived at this conclusion for the following reasons:

•
Although the majority of the compensation provided to our executives is variable and linked to performance, we believe an appropriate portion of their total compensation is fixed. The fixed (salary) portion provides a steady income regardless of the Company's stock performance and allows executives to focus on the Company's business without an excessive focus on the Company's stock price performance.

•
Our annual incentive awards are determined based on Company and individual performance measures, both operational and strategic, which mitigates excessive risk-taking that could produce unsustainable gains in one area of performance at the expense of our overall long-term interests. The Company goals are designed to ensure a proper balance between stock performance, operational measures, financial goals and strategic goals. In addition, the Compensation Committee sets Company performance goals that it believes are reasonable in light of our past performance, then-current business projections and market conditions, and our annual incentive awards are subject to maximum payout caps that limit the amount that may be earned by executives in consultation with the O&R Committee on inputs for certain of the operational measures.

•
A portion of our long-term equity-based incentive awards is comprised of time-based RSUs, which generally vest over three years and retain value even in a depressed market so executives are less likely to take unreasonable risks, while another portion (between 40% and 50% of the total award value in the case of our NEOs for 2015) is comprised of performance-based RSUs that measure our TSR over a specified two- to three-year period relative to the TSR performance of certain peer companies over the same period.

•
Our stock ownership guidelines further reduce the likelihood of unnecessary risk-taking because our executive officers are required to own a meaningful amount of Company stock.

In light of the above, the Compensation Committee believes that the various elements of our executive compensation program sufficiently incentivize our executives to act based on the sustained long-term growth and performance of the Company.

COMPENSATION & MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation & Management Development Committee has reviewed and discussed with Newfield's management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by the auditing standardsItem 402(b) of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), including those required by the PCAOB’s Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees”. The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP such independent auditors’ independence. The Audit Committee also has considered whether the provision of non-audit services to Newfield by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining their independence.

Regulation S-K included in this Proxy Statement. Based on thethis review and discussions referred to above,discussion, the AuditCompensation & Management Development Committee recommended to Newfield’sthe Board of Directors of Newfield that the audited financial statementsCompensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Newfield’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC.
this Proxy Statement.

This report is submitted on behalf of the Auditthe Compensation & Management Development Committee.

Thomas G. Ricks,

                        J. Terry Strange, Chair


Pamela J. Gardner
Steven W. Nance
Roger B. Plank
Juanita M. Romans
John W. Schanck
C.E. Chuck Shultz
J. Terry Strange

The foregoing AuditCompensation & Management Development Committee Report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 were as follows: ​
Category of Service 2013 2014
Audit fees $2,264,693
 $1,840,925
Audit-related fees 45,000
 40,775
Tax fees 321,464
 64,000
All other fees —
 —
Total $2,631,157
 $1,945,700

52        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    252016 PROXY STATEMENT


The audit fees for 2013 and 2014 were for professional services rendered in connection with the audits

Table of our consolidated financial statements and reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements within such years. These fees also include the statutory audit fees in Malaysia for 2013, and issuance of comfort letters, consents and assistance with review of various documents filed with the SEC in 2013 and 2014. The audit-related fees for 2013 and 2014 were for services related to accounting consultations. Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of local tax returns and international tax returns.

The Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services, including tax services, performed by our independent auditors as well as the fees charged for these services. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority for these services to one or more members, whose decisions are then presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In its review of all non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible effect of these services on the independence of our independent auditors.
Contents

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Audit Committee of our Board has appointed the independent registered public accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2015. PricewaterhouseCoopers has served as our independent auditor since 1999. We are not required under SEC regulations to submit this proposal, however, the Board believes it is appropriate and a good corporate governance practice to do so. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be offered the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for fiscal year 2015.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
TABLES

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation & Management Development Committee of our Board (Compensation Committee) oversees our compensation programs for executives and all employees. The Compensation Committee believes that for the Company and its stockholders to achieve long-term success, the compensation programs need to attract, retain, develop and motivate a strong leadership team. As a result, our executive compensation programs are designed to pay for performance, enable talent attraction, retain top talent and closely align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. The following discussion explains the Company’s compensation philosophy, summarizes its compensation programs and reviews compensation decisions for the following Named Executive Officers (NEOs):
Ø    Lee K. Boothby, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President;
Ø    Gary D. Packer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;
Ø    Lawrence S. Massaro, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Ø    George T. Dunn, Senior Vice President - Development; and
Ø    John H. Jasek, Senior Vice President - Operations.
Executive Summary
Executing on Our Strategy. Over the last decade, Newfield has transitioned from a diversified asset base of onshore, offshore and international operations to a portfolio focused on select, U.S. onshore, liquids-rich resource plays characterized by multiple, stacked geologic horizons. As our assets have changed, so have our executive compensation practices. During early 2013, management and the Compensation Committee underwent an in-depth, analytical process to tie compensation more directly to performance metrics they believe most closely align to the Company's strategic plan and to long-term value creation for stockholders. The Committee continued to refine this process and program during 2014, authorizing more transparent compensation targets for executives and working with the Board's Operations and Reserves Committee to determine the Company's 2014 performance metric targets. Looking forward to 2015, the Compensation Committee will continue to refine its evaluation processes and work to ensure that our executive compensation programs remain appropriately competitive in the marketplace and aligned with good corporate governance practices.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 26

During 2014, we demonstrated excellent execution across the Company, outperforming each of our performance metrics and strategic targets. Our 2014 stock performance reflected the positive execution results, ending the year up 10.1% over 2013, ranked 1st in our 2014 TSR peer group and 2nd out of all E&P companies in both the S&P 500 Index and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange SIG Oil Exploration & Production Index. Highlights from our 2014 performance include (adjusted for asset sales during the year, as applicable, please see Appendix A for a reconciliation of all non-GAAP financial measures):
üTop-tier stockholder return
◦Common stock value increased 10.1% year-over-year, and prior to commodity price declines that began during the second half of 2014, our 2014 stock value had increased 84% since the beginning of the year,
◦Average common stock value of the peers in our 2014 TSR awards decreased (44%) year-over-year,
◦Ended year ranked 1st out of 20 peers under our 2014 TSR awards and 2nd out of 20 peers under our 2013 TSR awards, and
◦As of March 16, 2015, our common stock value had increased approximately 30% since January 1, 2014.
üStrong year-over-year discretionary cash flow, production and reserve growth
◦Increased discretionary cash flow 28% to $1.2 billion,
◦Increased production 29% to 125 MBOED (57% liquids) (includes 2.1 Bcf (3.8 MBOEPD) of natural gas produced and consumed in operations),
◦Increased proved reserves 14% to 645 MMBOE (58% liquids), and
◦Increased pre-tax PV-10 18% to $8.8 billion.
ü    Significant expansion and development of our key resources in the Anadarko Basin
◦Increased production by 114% over 2013,
◦Increased proved reserves by 56% over 2013, and
◦Increased our leasehold position to nearly 300,000 net acres.
ü    Effective monetization of non-core assets
◦Closed on the sale of Malaysia business for approximately $900 million, and
◦Closed on more than $600 million of domestic assets sales (including Granite Wash).
üImproved balance sheet strength
◦Redeemed $600 million of our Senior Subordinated Notes from asset sale proceeds,
◦Materially reduced debt leverage,
◦Decreased average domestic lease operating expenses, on a per barrel basis, 7% year-over-year, and
◦Mitigated commodity price exposure through our derivative portfolio (approximately $800 million value at year end).
The outlook for our industry changed dramatically during the fourth quarter of 2014, as commodity prices rapidly declined, along with an associated decrease in equity markets, and we entered 2015 with the reality that commodity prices could remain "lower for longer". Despite the Company’s strong financial and operating performance, our stock price gave back much of the significant gain achieved in the first half of the year. Nevertheless, as discussed above, we finished at the top of our industry peer group in relative stockholder returns. As we continue to execute our strategic plan in early 2015, we have gained back some of the loss caused by the commodity price decline and as of March 16, 2015, our stock price was up approximately 17% year-to-date.
2014 Compensation Performance on Executive Compensation. As described in more detail below, the compensation programs and actions delivered outcomes aligned with our solid performance. The Company's top-tier operational, financial and strategic performance during 2014 resulted in the following compensation decisions and outcomes:
The Compensation Committee approved an annual incentive pay-out factor of 1.83, or 183%, well above target.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 27

The NEOs earned 30% of each of the 2010 and 2011 performance-based restricted stock awards eligible for vesting during 2014 based upon the Company's improved relative performance against industry peers (a portion of the foregoing vestings occurred on January 15, 2015 for the period ending December 31, 2014).
Due to current 2015 outlook and commodity price declines during late 2014, the Compensation Committee did not increase base salaries of the NEOs for 2015.
The Compensation Committee continued to grant performance-based, long-term equity awards constituting between 34% - 50% of the long-term incentives granted to the NEOs. The value of these awards are at-risk and tied directly to the Company's relative stockholder return performance among industry peers over a three-year period.
Compensation Philosophy and Governance Policies
Our compensation philosophy for executives is guided by the following principles:
Goal-Oriented Pay for Performance. The cornerstone of our compensation program for our executives and all employees, regardless of level, is “pay for performance”. In making compensation decisions, we consider annual and long-term Company performance and measure performance against our peers and against goals and metrics at the individual, business unit and corporate levels.
Competitive Compensation. The Compensation Committee believes it is imperative to maintain highly competitive compensation programs to attract, retain and motivate executives and our future leaders. Competition for experienced petroleum engineers, geologists, management and other top-tier talent in the oil and gas industry is intense. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of an independent consultant, annually reviews the compensation of similar executive positions at peer companies to ensure we remain competitive and continue to attract, retain and motivate top-tier talent.
Alignment with Long-Term Stockholder Interests. By providing long-term equity incentives, including time-vesting and performance-vesting equity incentives, we closely align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders in an effort to create long-term stockholder value.
Each element of our compensation program intends to further one or more of these principles. Our compensation philosophy rewards demonstrated performance and encourages behavior that is in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
In line with this philosophy, we currently implement the following governance policies and practices in our compensation programs:
Focus on Long-Term Performance. Between 55% and 73% of our NEOs' compensation is “at-risk” long-term incentives. In addition, between 34% - 50% of all long-term incentives granted to our NEOs are performance-based stock units. These performance-based stock units are subject to risk of forfeiture if the long-term total stockholder return objectives are not achieved.
Independent Committee and Executive Responsible for SERC. In late 2013, the Board created a new committee, the Operations & Reserves Committee, which has responsibility for the oversight of our safety, environmental, regulatory and compliance (SERC) matters along with oversight of the non-discretionary operational metrics under our annual incentive plan with the Compensation Committee. Our Chief Operating Officer has direct responsibility for our SERC team, and our SERC metrics make up 10% of our annual incentive performance factor.
Annual Say-on-Pay Vote. Our Board has approved and implemented an annual advisory vote by stockholders on the compensation of our NEOs.
Committee Consideration of Results of Stockholder Advisory Vote. The Committee is continuously mindful of stockholders’ views on executive compensation and remains focused on ensuring proper alignment of pay with performance. At our 2013 and 2014 Annual Meetings, more than 94% and 91% of our stockholders voted in support of our NEO compensation program.
No Employment Agreements. We do not have employment agreements with any of our executive officers, including the NEOs.
Double-Trigger Change of Control Provisions. Our change-of-control severance agreements are “double-trigger”, requiring both a change-in-control and loss of position before any severance payments are due.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 28

Independent Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors.
Independent Consultant and Peer Group Analysis. The Compensation Committee has engaged a consultant, who meets the independence requirements of the NYSE regulations. The consultant assists the Compensation Committee members with their analysis and discussions during meetings and in executive sessions.
Policy Prohibiting Pledging or Trading in Derivatives of our Stock. We prohibit executive officers from buying, selling or writing puts, calls or options related to Company stock. None of our executives has entered into hedging transactions involving our stock. We also prohibit executives from holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock as collateral for a loan.
Stock Ownership Requirements. We have implemented stock-ownership guidelines that require officers to maintain consistent stock ownership in the Company as set forth below, shown as a multiple of the executive’s annual base salary. As of year-end 2014, all NEOs met our stock-ownership guidelines:  
Ø Chief Executive Officer/President:
5 times base salary
Ø Chief Operating Officer:
3 times base salary
Ø Chief Financial Officer:
3 times base salary
Ø Executive VP or Senior VP:
3 times base salary
Ø VP - Business Unit Leader:
2 times base salary
Ø VP - Other, GC, Treasurer, Chief Accounting Officer:
1.5 times base salary
Policy on Tax Gross-Ups Upon Change of Control. During 2014, the Compensation Committee affirmatively resolved that it would not approve going forward any agreement or plan that includes tax gross-ups for the benefit of executives upon a change of control.
No Repricing or Back-Dating of Options. Although the Compensation Committee has not recently granted stock options, our stock incentive plan prohibits repricing of outstanding stock options without the approval of stockholders and we have never back-dated stock options.
Policy on Incentive Compensation Clawback. A significant percentage of our executive officers’ compensation is incentive-based. Although the Compensation Committee has not set a specific clawback policy, it does have the ability to direct the Company to seek to recover from any executive officer amounts determined to have been inappropriately received by the individual executive officer. In addition, under the 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee may require awards granted with performance goals to be subject to any future policy we may adopt relating to the recovery of that award in the event the associated performance goals were not actually achieved. Further, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates that the CEO and CFO reimburse the Company for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation paid to them in a year following the issuance of financial statements that are later required to be restated as a result of misconduct. The Compensation Committee intends to implement a more specific incentive compensation clawback policy based upon final regulations expected to be issued by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.
Tax Deductibility Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally disallows a tax deduction to a public company for compensation paid to its chief executive officer or any of its three other most highly compensated executive officers, excluding the chief financial officer, to the extent that the compensation of any of these officers exceeds $1 million in any calendar year. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limit. The performance-based restricted stock awards that the Compensation Committee began granting to executive officers in 2010 are designed to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of section 162(m). In addition, the portion of the annual incentive compensation that is based upon the non-discretionary measures set forth below are designed to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of section 162(m). No other components of our compensation awarded for 2014 currently qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of section 162(m).

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 29

Elements and Mix of our 2014 Compensation Program
The following elements made up the fiscal 2014 compensation program for our executive officers, including the NEOs:
Element
Form of Compensation
Purpose, Basis and Performance Criteria
Base SalaryCash
Ÿ   Base salary is intended to provide a market competitive level of fixed compensation in recognition of responsibilities, skills, capabilities, experience and leadership.
Ÿ  The Compensation Committee generally maintains executive base salaries near the median level of salaries for comparable positions among industry peers.
Ÿ   Base salary is not generally performance based, but reflective of competencies and experience.
Performance-Based Annual Incentive Awards (bonuses)
(considered “at-risk” compensation)
Cash
Ÿ   Annual cash incentive awards are intended to motivate and reward performance achievement against a set of stated annual corporate, business unit and individual goals.
Ÿ   Payments are made from a cash incentive pool approved annually by the Compensation Committee.
Ÿ   Each NEO’s award is then determined by the Compensation Committee’s assessment, with the assistance of the Operations and Reserves Committee, of four primary factors:
(i) non-discretionary relative performance metrics (30%);
(ii) non-discretionary near-term (one-year) performance goals (30%);
(iii) discretionary strategic goals (40%); plus or minus
(iv) individual performance adjustment.
Long-Term Incentive Awards(considered “at-risk” compensation)Restricted Stock Units
Ÿ   Long-term incentive awards are intended to recognize and reward the achievement of long-term corporate goals and objectives, recognize promotions, motivate retention of our leadership talent and align executives’ interests with our stockholders.
Ÿ   The Compensation Committee determines each February the amount and mix of long-term incentive awards to be granted to the NEOs; the Compensation Committee also may make isolated awards to recognize promotions, new hires or individual performance achievements.
Ÿ   In 2014, the long-term incentive awards included time-vested equity awards that vest over a three-year period and performance equity awards with the potential to vest based on our stock price performance relative to our peers over a two to three-year period.
Ÿ   The Compensation Committee provides time-vested long-term incentives to build a consistent ownership stake and retention incentive. The Compensation Committee provides performance-vested long-term incentives to create a meaningful tie to the Company’s relative long-term stockholder returns and to motivate consistent improvement over a longer-term horizon.
Ÿ   The ratio of time-vested to performance-vested awards varies by officer, based on the officer’s ability to influence overall corporate results. With respect to total equity-based awards, the Committee considers estimated targets for compensation, relative value of each element, expense of such awards and impact on dilution.
Change of Control Severance Plan and Severance AgreementsEligible to receive cash severance and post-termination health benefits in connection with involuntary termination within two or three years after a change of control
Ÿ   Our Change of Control Severance Plan for the Company and Severance Agreements with certain executives are intended to provide financial security and an industry-competitive compensation package for our executives. This additional security helps ensure that these officers remain focused on our performance and the continued creation of stockholder value throughout any change of control transaction rather than on the potential uncertainties associated with their own employment.
Ÿ   The Change of Control Severance Plan and the Severance Agreements are “double-trigger” agreements that generally provide certain payments to the executives if their employment is terminated during a two or three-year protected period after a change of control (depending on the executive).
Ÿ   No executive has an employment contract with the Company.
Retirement PlansEligible to participate in, and receive Company contributions to, our 401(k) Plan (all employees) and Deferred Compensation Plan (executives only)
Ÿ   Our retirement plans are intended to provide financial security for our executives and competitive retirement-planning benefits to attract and retain skilled management.
Ÿ   Our Deferred Compensation Plan allows an eligible executive to defer up to 90% of his or her salary and all of his or her bonus on an annual basis and build financial security. We make a matching contribution for up to 8% of the executive’s base salary in the retirement plans.
Ÿ   We do not have any defined benefit plans for our executives or employees.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)Eligible to purchase annually up to $25,000 of Company common stock at a discount (all employees)
Ÿ   The ESPP is intended to encourage an equity stake in the Company, aligning executive interests with those of our stockholders.
Health & Wellness PlansEligible to receive available health and other wellness benefits, including medical, dental, life and disability insurance (all employees) and annual physical examination (executives only)
Ÿ   Our health and wellness plans are intended to provide a competitive, broad-based employee benefits structure and to promote the wellness of our executives.
PerquisitesLimited reimbursement for fitness and business club dues
Ÿ   The reimbursement of club dues is intended to promote the wellness and business relationships of our executives.


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 30

Mix of Compensation Elements for NEOs
Over the last several years, the Compensation Committee has shifted more NEO compensation towards variable “at-risk” compensation (annual and long-term incentives), where actual amounts earned may differ from targeted amounts based on Company and individual performance. Beginning in 2013, each NEO has a target total compensation opportunity that is assessed annually by the Compensation Committee to ensure alignment with the Company’s compensation objectives and market practice.
The Compensation Committee believes that a program weighted towards compensation that is variable with performance, including stock price performance, ensures that NEO interests are aligned with stockholder interests. Furthermore, because all equity awards are subject to either time-based vesting or performance vesting, the compensation an NEO realizes in connection with equity awards is spread over several years, which the Committee believes assists in motivating the NEO to drive business growth over the long term.
As the following charts show, 86% of our CEO's target annual compensation is variable with performance, including Company, individual and stock price performance, which is directly consistent with our peers.
Evaluation Process, Including the Role of Consultants, Peer Comparisons and Officers
The Compensation Committee oversees the administration of the compensation programs applicable to our employees, including our executive officers. The Compensation Committee generally makes its decisions regarding the annual compensation of our NEOs at its regularly-scheduled meeting each February. These decisions include adjustments to base salary, grants of annual incentive awards and grants of long-term incentive awards. The Compensation Committee also makes compensation adjustments as necessary at other times during the year, such as in the case of promotions, changes in employment status and for competitive purposes.
Each year, our CEO prepares an evaluation of each of the other NEOs, and makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee based upon the Company's performance against its corporate performance metrics and the individual's performance against his or her goals. In addition to considering the CEO's recommendations, the Compensation Committee assesses the NEO’s impact during the year and his or her overall value to our Company, specifically by considering the NEO's leadership skills, impact on strategic initiatives, performance in his or her primary area of responsibility, his or her role in succession planning and development, and other intangible qualities that contribute to corporate and individual success. See “2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions” below.
Role of Consultants. During 2014, the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners LLC (Meridian) as its independent consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in compensation matters. Meridian reports exclusively to the Compensation Committee, which has sole authority to retain any compensation consultant to be used by the Compensation Committee to assist in the evaluation of compensation for our CEO and other executive officers, as well as our overall executive compensation structure. While engaged as the Committee’s consultant, Meridian did not perform any services for us outside the scope of its arrangement with the Compensation Committee. During 2014, the Compensation Committee conducted a review and determined that there were no conflicts of interest as a result of the Compensation Committee’s engagement of Meridian. The Compensation Committee did not engage any consultant other than Meridian during 2014 to provide executive compensation consulting services.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 31

In early 2015, the Committee reviewed the independence of Meridian during 2014 and confirmed the following:
Meridian supplies no services to the Company other than those as advisor to the Compensation Committee.
The fees for service Meridian charged the Company in 2014 amounted to less than 1% of Meridian’s annual revenues.
It is Meridian’s policy that when it represents a client’s compensation committee, it does not offer the company any additional services.
Except with respect to the engagement, neither Meridian nor its principal representative to the Company maintains any business or personal relationship with any executive officer or Committee member.
Neither Meridian nor its principal representative to the Company owns Company common stock.
Meridian assists the Compensation Committee in developing a competitive total compensation program that is consistent with our philosophy of “goal-oriented pay for performance” and allows us to attract, retain and motivate talented executives. Meridian’s services include providing an annual analysis of the compensation of our top executive officers and their counterparts at peer companies. The analysis consists of a comparison of each element of compensation and a comparison of total compensation, which we consider to include salary, annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive awards. Meridian also provides the Compensation Committee with assistance in the design of compensation and benefit programs and ongoing support with respect to regulatory and other considerations impacting compensation and benefit programs, as requested by the Compensation Committee.
Peer Groups. In October 2014, Meridian provided the Compensation Committee with an analysis of our compensation relative to prevailing compensation levels at industry peers. This analysis included adjustments for company size and our relative enterprise value among peers. The Compensation Committee referenced this analysis in its January and February 2015 meetings, where it determined annual cash incentive awards for performance during 2014, 2015 long-term incentive awards and 2015 salary changes. The peer companies used by Meridian for the Compensation Committee analysis were:
October 2014 Meridian Peer Group
Cabot Oil & Gas CorporationLaredo Petroleum Inc.Southwestern Energy Company
Cimarex Energy Co.Oasis Petroleum Inc.Ultra Petroleum Corp.
Concho Resources, Inc.QEP Resources, Inc.WPX Energy Inc.
Denbury Resources Inc.Range Resources CorporationWhiting Petroleum Corporation
EP Energy Corp.Sandridge Energy Inc.
Energen Corp.SM Energy Co.
The peer group was developed taking into consideration peer company metrics such as asset size and enterprise value, comparability of asset portfolio and the availability of compensation data. The Compensation Committee reviews the peer group periodically for reasonableness and approved the revised peer group in October 2014.
Role of the Chief Executive Officer. Annually, our CEO provides the Compensation Committee with an evaluation of his performance that is based, in large part, upon the corporate performance metrics described below under “2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions,” as well as his broader leadership roles as Chairman of our Board of Directors and as our lead representative to the investment community. The Compensation Committee evaluates our CEO on these and other criteria. The total compensation package for our CEO is determined based on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation and input from Meridian, and reflects his performance, the performance of our Company and competitive industry practices.
Role of Other Executive Officers. Our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on all compensation actions (other than his own compensation) affecting our NEOs. In developing his recommendation for an executive officer, our CEO considers the self-evaluation prepared by the NEO, the recommendations of his executive team, input from internal executive compensation experts, as well as his own evaluation. Our CEO’s evaluation includes an assessment of the impact that the NEO has had on our Company during the award year and the NEO’s overall value to the Company as a senior leader, taking into account the corporate performance goals described below under “2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions”.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 32

The Compensation Committee is provided with our CEO’s evaluation of each NEO’s performance and contributions to our Company. Meridian reviews and provides comments to the Compensation Committee on our CEO’s recommendations. The Compensation Committee considers the information and recommendations provided by our CEO and Meridian when it establishes base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and grants of long-term incentive awards. Compensation of the CEO is determined entirely by the Compensation Committee, with benchmarking assistance from Meridian.
2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions
In its February meeting each year, the Compensation Committee determines the annual performance incentive awards for prior-year performance, and base salaries, annual incentive targets and long-term incentive awards for the current year. During 2014, the Compensation Committee used the Company’s fourth quarter average stock price to determine the number of shares required to deliver the Compensation Committee’s intended long-term incentive opportunity. Meridian aided in the Compensation Committee’s consideration of the level of total compensation for our NEOs, allocations between annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive awards, the types of long-term incentive awards and the allocations between the types of long-term incentive awards.
The following is a discussion of the Compensation Committee's analysis of the Company's 2014 performance against its goals and the specific decisions made during 2014 with respect to each of our direct compensation elements. Each element is reviewed annually, as well as at the time of a promotion, other change in responsibilities, other significant corporate events or a material change in market conditions. Variances in the amount of compensation awarded to each NEO generally reflect differences in individual responsibility and experience as well as the competitive levels provided to officers in comparable positions in our industry peer group. Overall, our CEO’s compensation is higher than the compensation of the other NEOs. This difference in compensation is supported by the industry peer group benchmark data, which is substantially higher for the CEO role than for the other NEO positions, and is indicative of the greater responsibility the CEO position has for the strategic direction, financial condition, operating results and image of the Company.
Base Salary. The Compensation Committee reviews executive base salaries annually, with the goal of providing a stable base of competitive cash compensation while rewarding corporate and individual performance through annual performance incentive awards. In light of the Company's performance during 2013, the Compensation Committee decided not to increase the NEOs base salary for 2014, except for a 2.0% increase for Messrs. Dunn and Jasek. In October of 2014, Mr. Jasek was promoted from Vice President - Onshore Gulf Coast, to Senior Vice President - Operations, at which time the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Jasek's salary to be competitive with other similar Senior Vice President roles. In light of the significant decline in commodity prices during the second half of 2014, and the uncertainty surrounding future commodity prices and the corresponding impact on the oil and gas industry during 2015, the Compensation Committee decided not to increase any of the NEOs base salaries for 2015. A summary of the base salary adjustments made during 2014 and 2015 are reflected in the following table.
 2013 Base Salary2014 Base Salary2015 Base Salary
Mr. Boothby$850,000
$850,000
$850,000
Mr. Massaro$420,000
$420,000
$420,000
Mr. Packer$540,750
$540,750
$540,750
Mr. Dunn$375,000
$382,500
$382,500
Mr. Jasek(1)
$343,200
$350,064
$400,000
Consistent with the Compensation Committee's goal to shift NEO compensation towards greater "at risk" compensation, including annual performance incentive awards and long-term incentive awards, the 2014 base salaries for our NEOs represented between 13% and 20% of their total compensation for 2014, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 41 of this Proxy Statement.
Performance-Based Annual Incentive Awards (Bonuses). During early 2013, the Compensation Committee and management went through an in-depth, analytical process to determine the corporate performance metrics that they believe most closely align near-term financial and operations performance with long-term value creation for stockholders. The process resulted in the following performance measurement categories and weightings that determined the Company's annual incentive performance factor (AIP Factor) for 2014 annual incentive performance awards, with a collective AIP Factor Threshold of .35, Target of 1.0 and Maximum of 2.0. The Compensation Committee intended the achievement of these performance goals to result in strong TSR performance over time. To note, below we refer to our domestic discretionary cash flow, domestic development costs and our net debt/Adjusted EBITDA ratio, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Appendix A to this proxy statement contains an explanation of how we calculate these measures.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 33

Category 1 (30%) – Relative Performance Goals (Threshold .63, Target 1.0, Maximum 2.0) (Non-Discretionary): In 2014, the Compensation Committee chose three key drivers that management and the Committee believe consistently align with value creation within the Company. The Committee approved quantitative performance targets (threshold/target/stretch) and benchmarked the performance targets against observed industry peer company performance. For 2014, these performance drivers included:
Ødomestic production,
Ødomestic proved reserves, and
Ødomestic discretionary cash flow.
Category 2 (30%) – Near-Term Performance Goals (Threshold .53, Target 1.0, Maximum 2.0) (Non-Discretionary): In 2014, management and the Compensation Committee developed calendar year specific goals that focused on critical near-term strategic objectives that they believed should be accomplished in order to achieve long-term success. The Committee approved quantitative performance targets (threshold/target/stretch). For 2014, these metrics included:
Ødomestic liquids production growth,
Ødomestic finding and development costs, and
Øsafety, environmental, regulatory and compliance performance.
Category 3 (40%) – Strategic Goals (Threshold 0, Target 1.0, Maximum 2.0) (Discretionary): In 2014, management, with the input of the Compensation Committee, developed annual strategic goals that relate to the Company’s long-term strategy and value creation. Determining the success of these strategic goals is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. To assess management's strategic execution during 2014, the Compensation Committee considered year-over-year growth in stockholder value, domestic net asset value, domestic reserve PV-10, the financial strength of the company and key strategic milestones, such as the resolving international sales process and expanding the Company's quality drilling inventory.
Category 4 – Individual Performance Factor (0 to 100%): The Committee may adjust an executive officer’s bonus payment upward or downward based on the Committee’s assessment of individual performance.
The Compensation Committee calculated the annual incentive award amounts based on the following formula:
Base SalaryXTarget IncentiveXAIP Factor+/-Individual Performance=NEO Annual Incentive
ò
30% Relative Performance Goals (Threshold .53, Target 1.0, Maximum 2.0)
30% Near-Term Performance Goals (Threshold .63, Target 1.0, Maximum 2.0)
40% Strategic Goals (Threshold 0, Target 1.0, Maximum 2.0)
òòò
Domestic ProductionDomestic Liquids Production GrowthValue Creation
Domestic Proved ReservesDomestic Development CostsBalance Sheet Strength
Domestic DCFSERC PerformanceResolve International
Expand Quality Drilling Inventory
Each of the goals is measured independently, with metric payout factors ranging from 0x to 2.0x. A 1.0x score generally indicates target performance and a higher score (up to 2.0x) indicates above target performance. For purposes of 2014, the AIP Factor was calculated based on the weighted average of all the payout metrics as follows:

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 34

2014 Corporate Performance MetricsWeightTarget MetricTarget PayoutActualDetermined AIP Factor
Relative Performance Goals (Non-Discretionary): 
Domestic Production10%45.3 MMBOE1.247.9 MMBOE1.80
Domestic Proved Reserves10%555 MMBOE1.1622 MMBOE1.80
Domestic Discretionary Cash Flow10%$1,081M1.2$1,292M1.60
Near-Term Performance Goals (Non-Discretionary): 
Domestic Liquids Production Growth10%25.1 MMBOE1.126.8 MMBOE1.80
Domestic Development Costs10%$17.00/BOE1.0$16.62/BOE1.40
SERC Performance(1)
10%Various1.0N/A1.90
Strategic Goals (Discretionary): 
Value Creation(2)
40%N/A1.0discretionary2.0
Balance Sheet Strength(3)
Resolve International(4)
Expand Quality Drilling Inventory(5)
Total100%   1.83
(1) In determining the outcome for SERC Performance, the Compensation Committee considered the Company's total recordable incident rate (TRIR), the Company's oil spill rate and corresponding contractor rates. Key observations included 62% year-over-year reduction in completions TRIR, 39% year-over-year reduction in drilling TRIRs, and a 38% year-over-year decrease in oil spill events.
(2)    In determining the outcome for Value Creation, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including the stock price increase year-over-year, relative year-over-year stock performance as compared to industry peers and leadership's ability to deliver on the Company's three-year strategic plan.
(3)     In determining the outcome for Balance Sheet Strength, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including the Company's substantial decline in its ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA (2.17x to 1.94x), redemption of $600 million of long-term debt and management's ability to secure a strong protective derivative position that protects the balance sheet in a declining commodity price market.
(4)     In determining the outcome for Resolving International, the Compensation Committee considered the Company's sale of the Malaysia business for approximately $900 million in February 2014 and the decision not to sell China due to the commodity price decline and the resulting positive cash flow that the production in China should contribute to the Company's strategic plan.
(5)     In determining the outcome for Expanding Quality Drilling Inventory, the Compensation Committee considered the substantial expansion in the Anadarko Basin, specifically an acreage increase to almost 300,000 net acres, production year-over-year increase of 114% and year-over year proved reserves increase of 56%.
After determining the final AIP Factor, the Compensation Committee looked at the individual performance of each NEO, taking into consideration the NEO’s impact during the year and his overall value to our Company, specifically by considering the NEO's leadership skills, impact on strategic initiatives, performance in his primary area of responsibility, role in succession planning and development, and other intangible qualities that contribute to corporate and individual success. With respect to Mr. Jasek, the Compensation Committee also considered the fact that Mr. Jasek was promoted in October 2014 and received a substantial stock grant in connection with his promotion. Based upon the foregoing, the Compensation Committee made the following 2014 annual performance incentive awards for performance during 2014:

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 35

 Base SalaryAnnual Target IncentiveAIP FactorAIP Target Payout+/- Individual PerformanceActual Payout
Mr. Boothby$850,000120%1.83$1,866,600
$183,400
$2,050,000
Mr. Massaro$420,000100%1.83$768,600
$171,400
$940,000
Mr. Packer$540,750100%1.83$989,573
$97,427
$1,087,500
Mr. Dunn$382,50085%1.83$594,980
$40,020
$635,000
Mr. Jasek$359,05085%1.83$558,502
$(23,502)$535,000
The Compensation Committee's primary drivers to the noteworthy individual performance adjustments:
Mr. Boothby: In reviewing the CEO’s performance, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Boothby's demonstrated leadership in managing the Company through its transformation, and the numerous performance outcomes realized from that transformation in 2014. The Compensation Committee recognized the CEO’s leadership contribution by assigning an above-target personal performance factor and awarding a total bonus at approximately 200% of the CEO’s target.
Mr. Massaro: The personal performance factor reflected Mr. Massaro's integral involvement and successful leadership in divesting the Company's Malaysian business for approximately $900 million, which closed in February 2014. The adjustment also reflected his successful transition to Chief Financial Officer and the Company's improved financial strength during 2014.
Mr. Packer: The personal performance factor reflected Mr. Packer's continued leadership and his role in the Company's outstanding operational execution, exceeding target and expectations for all operational, production and reserve metrics during 2014.
Mr. Dunn: The personal performance factor reflected Mr. Dunn's role with respect to the Company's outstanding production and reserve metrics during 2014.
Mr. Jasek: The Compensation Committee recognized that Mr. Jasek had excellent performance during the year; however, his promotion on October 28, 2014 included a 14% salary increase and a stock award grant of 27,000 shares, thereby materially increasing his total 2014 compensation, which impacted the Compensation Committee's decision.
Long-term Incentive Awards. The Compensation Committee believes that long-term incentive awards should include both time-vested and performance-vested awards. The ratio of time-vested to performance-vested awards will vary by officer, based on the officer’s ability to influence overall corporate results, with more senior executive officers’ awards being more heavily weighted toward performance-based awards. By providing both types of awards each year, the Compensation Committee seeks to balance the retention incentive provided by time-vested awards with the strong tie to relative long-term stockholder return provided by performance-based awards. The following graph displays the current mix of time-vested and performance-vested long-term incentives:
Mix of Long-Term Incentive Awards
In its February meeting each year, the Compensation Committee determines the long-term incentive awards for the then-current year by calculating an estimated grant-date award opportunity to each NEO. The 2014 awarded share units are calculated by using (i) the fourth quarter's average stock price for time-vested awards and (ii) an estimated fair market value factor based upon accounting rules for performance-vesting awards.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 36

In February of 2014, the Compensation Committee evaluated information provided by Meridian on the range of long-term incentive opportunities awarded across the peer group companies, along with the Company’s recent performance and the role of each executive officer in achieving the Company’s three-year plan. The Compensation Committee also evaluated the CEO’s recommendations for long-term incentive award amounts for the other NEOs. Based on these evaluations, the Compensation Committee approved the following annual LTI awards for the NEOs in February of 2014.
 Intended LTI Opportunity Value ($) Time-Vested Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Units (#) Time-Vested Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units (#) TSR Performance-Vested Restricted Stock Units (#)
Mr. Boothby$4,400,821
 39,230
 39,230
 98,040
Mr. Massaro$1,795,200
 16,000
 16,000
 40,000
Mr. Packer$2,541,330
 22,500
 22,500
 57,000
Mr. Dunn$987,360
 7,000
 7,000
 14,000
Mr. Jasek(1)
$370,260
 1,200
 1,200
 13,500
(1) In September of 2013, Mr. Jasek received a time-vested restricted stock unit award for 20,000 shares of common stock. The other NEOs did not receive a stock grant in September of 2013, which is the reason that Mr. Jasek's award in February 2014 is substantially lower than the other NEOs. In addition, in connection with his promotion in October 2014 to Senior Vice President - Operations, Mr. Jasek received a time-vested restricted stock unit award for 27,000 shares of common stock, which is not reflected in the foregoing table.
Equity awards for newly hired executive officers are made on the executive officer’s first day of employment. Equity awards for executive officers made in connection with promotions are approved by the Compensation Committee and the grant date is generally effective the date of appointment. See page 43 below for more details on the awards.
Vesting of the February 2014 performance-based awards (TSRs) is based on our total cumulative stockholder return for at least two years and up to three years relative to a 19-member peer group approved by the Compensation Committee. The peer group for the 2014 TSRs includes the following peer companies (or their successors): Bill Barrett Corporation, Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc., Cimarex Energy Co., Comstock Resources, Inc., EP Energy, Forest Oil Corporation, Halcon Resource, Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp., Laredo Petroleum, Oasis Petroleum, PDC Energy, Penn Virginia, QEP Resources, Rosetta Resources, SandRidge Energy, SM Energy, Ultra Petroleum Corp., Whiting Petroleum Corporation and WPX Energy. The 2014 TSRs can vest each month beginning on April 15, 2016 and ending on April 15, 2017. Although the TSRs have the ability to vest monthly, all TSRs vest based upon our two and up to three-year cumulative stockholder return, as calculated on the determination date, as compared to the applicable peer group. The percentage of each TSR that shall vest, if any, is calculated each month during the applicable performance period by determining our total stockholder return rank among the peer group as follows:

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 37

Ranking Relative to Peers - Percent Earned
  RankPercent Earned
Top Quartile×1100%
2100%
3100%
4100%
5100%
Second Quartile×670%
765%
860%
955%
1050%
Third Quartile×1145%
1240%
1335%
1430%
1525%
Bottom Quartile×160%
170%
180%
190%
200%

Vesting of the February 2013 and February 2012 TSRs is based on our total cumulative stockholder return for at least three years and up to five years relative to a 17-member peer group approved by the Compensation Committee. The peer group for the 2013 TSRs includes the following peer companies (or their successors): Berry Petroleum Corporation, Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Cimarex Energy Co., Comstock Resources, Inc., Denbury Resources Inc., EXCO Resources Inc., Forest Oil Corporation, Noble Energy, Inc., Pioneer Natural Resources, Plains Exploration & Production Company, QEP Resources, Range Resources Corporation, SandRidge Energy, Southwestern Energy Company, Ultra Petroleum Corp., Whiting Petroleum Corporation, as well as the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index and the S&P 500 Index. The 2013 TSRs can vest each month beginning on April 15, 2016 and ending on April 15, 2018 and the 2012 TSRs can vest each month beginning on April 15, 2015 and ending on April 15, 2017. Although the TSRs have the ability to vest monthly, all 2013 and 2012 TSRs vest based upon our three and up to five-year cumulative stockholder return, as calculated on the determination date, as compared to the applicable peer group.
Total stockholder return as of a particular measurement date means the rate of return (expressed as percentage) achieved with respect to our common stock, the primary common equity security of each other company and index in the peer group if: (1) $100 was invested in each security or index on the last day of March for the applicable grant year, assuming a purchase price equal to the average closing price of the security or index for all of the trading days in March for the applicable grant year; (2) if the record date for any dividend with respect to a particular security occurs during the period beginning March 31 of the applicable grant year and ending on the last day of the determination period, such dividend was reinvested in the security as of the record date for the dividend (using the closing price of the security on the record date); and (3) the valuation of such security or index at the end of the determination period is based on the average closing price for all of the trading days in the immediately preceding month. In view of the competitive conditions in our industry, all restricted stock unit awards continue to contain qualified retirement vesting provisions that are conditioned upon the signing of a non-compete agreement and providing a specific amount of advance notice before retirement to allow adequate time for a smooth transition.
For more information regarding the terms of the 2014 awards, as well as the fair value of the 2014 awards on their grant date, see “Grants of Plan-Based Equity Awards in 2014” beginning on page 43 of this Proxy Statement.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 38

CEO Compensation: Realizable Pay
As discussed above, NEO compensation is weighted towards variable “at-risk” compensation (annual and long-term incentives), where actual amounts earned may differ from targeted amounts based on Company and individual performance. Each NEO has a target total compensation opportunity that is assessed annually by the Compensation Committee to ensure alignment with the Company’s compensation objectives and market practice.
While the amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 41 reflect the grant-date value of equity awards received by the CEO, they do not reflect the impact of stock price performance on actual compensation. The compensation actually realizable by the individual may be considerably more or less based on actual stock price performance. For purposes of the table below:
“SCT” means the amount shown in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table, excluding the amounts shown in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” and “All Other Compensation” columns.
“Realized Pay” means the sum of: (1) salary, (2) actual cash bonus paid for each fiscal year, and (3) the actual “take-home” value of vested equity awards during the measurement period.
“Realizable Pay” means the sum of: (1) salary, (2) actual cash bonus paid for each fiscal year, (3) all unvested performance shares (PS) outstanding, regardless of grant date, calculated using the Company’s $27.12 stock price on December 31, 2014, and (4) time-vested restricted stock units (RS) granted during the period, in each case, calculated using the Company’s $27.12 stock price on December 31, 2014. Realizable pay assumes time-vested equity awards are 100% vested upon grant, even though such awards may vest over a period of three or more years.
The Compensation Committee believes that realized compensation is more representative of compensation actually earned than is the compensation shown in the Summary Compensation Table and that realizable compensation is a reflection of the executive's total potential compensation.



NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 39

Conclusion

We believe our executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance. We believe it aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders and provides executive officers with motivation to maximize the long-term operational and financial performance of the Company, while using sound financial controls and high standards of integrity. We also believe that total compensation for each of our NEOs should be, and is, commensurate with the execution of specified relative and long-term operational, financial and strategic objectives. The Compensation Committee believes that the changes made to the Company's compensation programs over the last two years will reflect in positive long-term operational and financial performance and long-term stockholder value creation.



NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 40

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information with respect to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers, collectively the NEOs, for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012.2013.

Name and Principal Position
 Year Salary
($)(1)		 Bonus
($)(1)(2)		 Stock
Awards
($)(3)		 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(1)(2)		 All Other
Compensation
($)(4)(5)		 Total
($)		 

Lee K. Boothby

 ​2015 $850,000 $4,800 $6,038,119 $1,795,200 $86,526 $8,774,645 

    Chairman of the Board,

 ​2014 ​850,000 ​183,400 ​3,734,242 ​1,866,600 ​82,599 ​6,716,841 

    CEO and President

 ​2013 ​842,308 ​— ​3,942,797 ​600,000 ​64,208 ​5,449,313 

Lawrence S. Massaro

  2015 $420,000 $100,800 $2,368,811 $739,200 $31,109 $3,659,920 

    Executive Vice President

  2014  420,000  171,400  1,523,280  768,600  256,203  3,139,483 

    and CFO

  2013  377,446  38,000  1,961,880  462,000  24,618  2,863,944 

Gary D. Packer

 ​2015 $540,750 $48,280 $3,551,990 $951,720 $61,884 $5,154,625 

    Executive Vice President

 ​2014 ​540,750 ​97,925 ​2,156,055 ​989,575 ​55,282 ​3,839,587 

    and COO

 ​2013 ​538,327 ​5,175 ​2,363,549 ​594,825 ​37,480 ​3,539,356 

George T. Dunn

  2015 $382,500 $27,780 $1,408,165 $572,220 $36,572 $2,427,236 

    Sr. Vice President-

  2014  381,346  40,020  845,020  594,980  39,573  1,900,939 

    Development

  2013  375,000  9,375  918,235  350,625  16,184  1,669,419 

John H. Jasek

 ​2015 $400,000 $16,600 $1,173,684 $598,400 $39,171 $2,227,856 

    Sr. Vice President –

 ​2014 ​356,690 ​— ​1,095,816 ​535,000 ​41,713 ​2,029,219 

    Operations

 ​2013 ​341,169 ​54,110 ​1,422,325 ​320,890 ​18,481 ​2,156,975 
      
Bonus(1)(2)  
   
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Comp(2)
 
Nonqualified
Deferred
Comp
Earnings(4)
($)
 
All Other
Compensation(5)
($)
  
Name and Principal
Position
 
Year 
 
Salary(1) 
($) 
 
Current
($) 
 Deferred
($)		 
Stock 
Awards(3) ($)
   
Total 
($) 
Lee K. Boothby 2014 $850,000
 $183,400
 $—
 $3,734,242
 $1,866,600
 $—
 $82,599
 $6,716,841
Chairman of the Board, 2013 842,308
 —
 —
 3,942,797
 600,000
 —
 64,208
 5,449,313
President and CEO 2012 788,463
 1,080,000
 245,000
 3,126,708
 —
 4,492
 78,060
 5,322,723
Lawrence S. Massaro 2014 $420,000
 $171,400
 $—
 $1,523,280
 $768,600
 $—
 $34,886
 $2,918,166
Executive Vice President 2013 377,446
 38,000
 —
 1,961,880
 462,000
 —
 24,618
 2,863,944
and CFO(6)
 2012 356,923
 330,000
 —
 711,420
 —
 —
 41,113
 1,439,456
Gary D. Packer 2014 $540,750
 $97,925
 $—
 $2,156,055
 $989,575
 $—
 $55,282
 $3,839,587
Executive Vice President 2013 538,327
 5,175
 —
 2,363,549
 594,825
 —
 37,480
 3,539,356
and COO 2012 517,308
 550,000
 203,656
 1,893,660
 —
 3,734
 266,759
 3,435,117
George T. Dunn 2014 $381,346
 $40,020
 $—
 $845,020
 $594,980
 $—
 $39,573
 $1,900,939
Sr. Vice President – 2013 375,000
 9,375
 —
 918,235
 350,625
 —
 16,184
 1,669,419
Development(7)
 2012 371,154
 300,000
 164,150
 711,420
 —
 3,010
 78,719
 1,628,453
John H. Jasek 2014 $356,690
 $—
 $—
 $1,095,816
 $535,000
 $—
 $41,713
 $2,029,219
Vice President – 2013 341,169
 54,110
 —
 1,422,325
 320,890
 —
 18,481
 2,156,975
Gulf Coast(8)
 2012 328,462
 300,000
 133,219
 567,138
 —
 2,435
 40,545
 1,371,799
___________________
(1)See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions” beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement for an explanation of the amount of salary and bonus in proportion to total compensation.
(2)The amounts shown reflect annual incentive cash compensation awards made
(1)
See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Philosophy and Components – Direct Compensation Components" beginning on page 35 for an explanation of the amount of salary and target bonus amounts with respect to 2015 annual incentive awards in proportion to target total direct compensation.

(2)
The amounts shown for 2015 reflect payments pursuant to the annual incentive awards granted in February 2015 pursuant to the 2015 AIP. In accordance with SEC regulations, the amounts reported in the "Bonus" column reflect the amount paid pursuant to the individual performance measure assessment portion of the annual incentive awards, while the amounts reported in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column reflect the amount paid pursuant to the three Company performance measure categories under the annual incentive awards based on the collective AIP Factor for 2015. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2015 Compensation Decisions – Annual Incentive Awards" beginning on page 39.

(3)
The amounts shown in the "Stock Awards" column for 2015 reflect the full aggregate grant date fair value of stock-based awards granted during 2015, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, determined without regard to forfeitures, as required by SEC regulations, and do not reflect the actual value that may be recognized by each NEO.

    During 2015, 2014 and 2013, based upon performance in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In accordance with SEC regulations, the amounts under “Bonus - Current” for 2014 and 2013 include the portion of the annual cash incentive award received by the NEO that the Compensation Committee used its discretion to increase above the calculated AIP Factor for the NEO's personal performance. The amounts under "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" for 2014 and 2013 include the portion of the annual cash incentive award paid and calculated under our non-equity annual incentive plan, including any discretion the Compensation Committee used to decrease the award for the NEOs personal performance during the applicable year. The amounts under "Bonus - Current" for 2012 reflect the entire annual cash incentive award for the NEO's performance during 2012, which was prior the the Compensation Committee's adoption of its defined non-equity incentive plan in early 2013. The amounts in the “Deferred” column include cash plus interest actually paid to each NEO during 2012 that was part of the deferred cash bonus awards granted in prior years pursuant to our 2003 Annual Incentive Plan. These amounts are not reflective of the applicable year’s performance but of prior years’ performance and deferred to reward retention. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions – Performance-Based Annual Incentive Awards (Bonuses)” beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement.

(3)The amounts shown in the Stock Awards column reflect the full grant date fair value of stock-based awards in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, computed in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, as required by SEC regulations.
During 2014, 2013 and 2012, the NEOs received annual grants of restricted stock units that vest based on performance,performance-based RSUs subject to both continued service and relative TSR vesting conditions, which are considered market-based awards under theapplicable accounting guidance. For these market-based awards of restricted stock units that vest based on performance,the 2015 performance-based RSUs, the grant date fair value was determined in accordance with stock-based accounting rules and the fair market valuebased on a per share was $18.59 in 2014, $24.20 in 2013 and $31.02 in 2012. The grant date fair value assumesprice of $22.85, which is determined based on the highest levelprobability of achieving the performance conditions will be achieved.
target. In addition, during 2014,2015, the NEOs received annual grants of time-vested,time-based RSUs (50% stock-settled restricted stock units (50% of time-vested awards) and annual grants of time-vested, cash-settled restricted stock units (50% of time-vested awards). During 2013 and 2012, the NEOs received annual grants of time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units (100% of time-vested awards)50% cash-settled). For each of these awards, the grant date fair value iswas based on a per share price of $29.43, which is the mean of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the February 11, 2015 date of grant. Mr. Jasek also received an additional grant of 27,000 time-vested restricted stock units in October 2014.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 41

For assumptions made in the valuation of the awards reported in this column, see also Note 11,14, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20142015 filed with the SEC. See also “Compensation"Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2014 Performance Analysis and2015 Compensation Decisions – Long-termLong-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards”Awards" beginning on page 36, “Grants45, "Grants of Plan-Based Equity Awards in 2014”2015" beginning on page 4354 and “Outstanding"Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2014”2015" beginning on page 4456 for a further description of thethese awards.

(4)Reflects above-market interest (as defined in SEC regulations) earned in 2012 on long-term cash awards previously awarded under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan.
(5)

(4)
For 2014, the All Other Compensation column reflects:
the amount we contributed undershown in the "All Other Compensation" column for Mr. Massaro includes a relocation expense of $217,020 and a gross up amount of $4,296 for a total of $221,316. This amount was inadvertently omitted from our Deferred Compensation Plan or our 401(k) Plan as a matching contribution for the benefit of each named executive officer;2014 Proxy Statement.
the compensation cost computed in accordance with applicable accounting guidance attributable to each NEO’s participation in our employee stock purchase plan;
club dues paid by us and executive physical examinations paid by us; and
premiums we paid with respect to term life insurance for the benefit of each named executive officer.
See the All Other Compensation Table below for more information regarding these items for 2014.
All Other Compensation Table
Name 
 
Matching
401(k) or
Deferral Plan
Contribution
($) 
 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
Compensation
Cost
($)		 Club
Dues ($)		 Executive
Physical  ($)		 Life
Insurance
Premiums  ($)		 Total
($)
Mr. Boothby $68,000
 $6,011
 $3,656
 $4,395
 $537
 $82,599
Mr. Massaro $33,599
 $—
 $750
 $—
 $537
 $34,886
Mr. Packer $43,260
 $5,960
 $1,130
 $4,395
 $537
 $55,282
Mr. Dunn $30,507
 $4,287
 $150
 $4,395
 $234
 $39,573
Mr. Jasek $28,535
 $5,981
 $2,568
 $4,395
 $234
 $41,713
(6)Mr. Massaro was promoted to the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2013. The summary compensation information presented above includes compensation paid to Mr. Massaro in that capacity since November 2013. Mr. Massaro was hired to the position of Vice President – Corporate Development on March 1, 2011. The summary compensation information presented above includes compensation paid to Mr. Massaro in that capacity until his promotion in November 2013.
(7)Mr. Dunn was promoted to the position of Senior Vice President – Development on September 2, 2012. The summary compensation information presented above includes compensation paid to Mr. Dunn in that capacity since September 2, 2012 and in his capacity as Vice President – Mid-Continent prior thereto.
(8)Mr. Jasek was promoted to the position of Senior Vice President – Operations on October 28, 2014. The summary compensation information presented above includes compensation paid to Mr. Jasek in that capacity since October 28, 2014 and in his capacity as Vice President – Onshore Gulf Coast prior thereto.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    422016 PROXY STATEMENT        53

Table of Contents

(5)
For 2015, "All Other Compensation" includes:

Name
 Matching
401(k) Plan
Contribution ($)		 Matching
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
Contribution ($)		 Other
Perquisites (1)($)		 Total ($) 

Mr. Boothby

 ​18,000 ​52,615 ​15,911 ​86,526 

Mr. Massaro

  18,000  —  13,109  31,109 

Mr. Packer

 ​18,000 ​26,924 ​16,960 ​61,884 

Mr. Dunn

  18,000  13,777  4,795  36,572 

Mr. Jasek

 ​18,000 ​15,231 ​5,940 ​39,171 
(1)
Includes payment of fitness and business club dues; annual executive physical examinations; personal security; and matching charitable contributions (which is available to all employees up to $2,500). Matching charitable contributions paid on behalf of Mr. Packer in 2015 included a match for a gift he made in late 2014 but not matched until January 2015. $1,100 of this amount was attributed to Mr. Packer's 2014 matching charitable contribution. In addition, family members of certain NEOs accompanied the NEOs on a company-chartered plane when they were travelling for business purposes but the company incurred no incremental or additional costs.


Grants of Plan-Based Equity Awards in 2014
2015

The following table contains information about grants of plan-based restricted stock unitsawards to our NEOs during 2014.2015.

      Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards 		 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards 		  All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of		  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock		 

Name

     
Grant Date 		 Threshold
($) 		 Target
($) 		 Maximum
($) 		 Threshold
(#) 		 Target
(#) 		 Maximum
(#) 		 Stock or Units
(#) 		 Awards
($)(4) 		 

Mr. Boothby

 (1a) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​48,930 $1,440,010 

​

 (1b) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​48,930 ​1,440,010 

​

 (2) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​34,553 ​138,210 ​138,210 ​​ ​3,158,099 

​

 (3) ​​ ​382,500 ​1,020,000 ​2,040,000 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ 

Mr. Massaro

 (1a)  02/11/2015                    19,200 $565,056 

 (1b)  02/11/2015                    19,200  565,056 

 (2)  02/11/2015           13,553  54,210  54,210     1,238,699 

 (3)     157,500  420,000  840,000                

Mr. Packer

 (1a) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​28,785 $847,143 

​

 (1b) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​28,785 ​847,143 

​

 (2) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​20,325 ​81,300 ​81,300 ​​ ​1,857,705 

​

 (3) ​​ ​202,781 ​540,750 ​1,081,500 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ 

Mr. Dunn

 (1a)  02/11/2015                    13,815 $406,575 

 (1b)  02/11/2015                    13,815  406,575 

 (2)  02/11/2015           6,510  26,040  26,040     595,014 

 (3)     121,922  325,125  650,250                

Mr. Jasek

 (1a) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​11,520 $339,034 

​

 (1b) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​11,520 ​339,034 

​

 (2) ​02/11/2015 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​5,423 ​21,690 ​21,690 ​​ ​495,617 

​

 (3) ​​ ​127,500 ​340,000 ​680,000 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ 
     Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards 
Estimated Future Payouts Under 
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
 
All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards(3) ($)
Name 
  
Grant 
Date 
 Threshold ($) 
Target
($)
 Maximum ($) Threshold (#) Target (#) Maximum (#) 
Mr. Boothby
(1) 
 02/12/14             78,460
 $1,911,678
 
(2) 
 02/12/14       24,510
 98,040
 98,040
   1,822,564
 
(4) 
   357,000
 1,020,000
 2,040,000
          
Mr. Massaro
(1) 
 02/12/14             32,000
 $779,680
 
(2) 
 02/12/14       10,000
 40,000
 40,000
   743,600
 
(4) 
   147,000
 420,000
 840,000
          
Mr. Packer
(1) 
 02/12/14 —
           45,000
 $1,096,426
 
(2) 
 02/12/14       14,250
 57,000
 57,000
   1,059,629
 
(4) 
   189,263
 540,750
 1,081,500
          
Mr. Dunn
(1) 
 02/12/14             24,000
 $584,760
 
(2) 
 02/12/14       3,500
 14,000
 14,000
   260,260
 
(4) 
   113,452
 324,148
 648,295
          
Mr. Jasek
(1) 
 02/12/14             2,400
 $58,476
 
(2) 
 02/12/14       3,375
 13,500
 13,500
   250,965
 
(1) 
 10/24/14             27,000
 786,375
 
(4) 
   106,115
 303,187
 606,373
          
___________________
(1)Reflects 50% time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units and 50% time-vested, cash-settled restricted stock units awarded under our First Amended 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan.
(2)Reflects the estimated future payout of restricted stock units awarded under our First Amended 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan that vest based on performance. NEOs may earn from 0% to 100% of the targeted award based on the Company’s relative total stockholder return performance over a specified period. The minimum threshold is based upon the lowest earned amount of 25% based on the payout scale described on page 38, although the minimum potential payout is zero. The target and maximum payouts are based upon the highest earned amount of 100% based on the payout scale described on page 38.
(3)Reflects the full grant date fair value of the stock-based awards computed in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. For assumptions made in the valuation, see also Note 11, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC and see “Summary Compensation Table” beginning on page 41 of this Proxy Statement.
(4)Reflects estimated cash payouts under the Company's annual incentive plan, as discussed on page 36, based on actual salaries earned by each NEO in 2014. If threshold levels of performance are not met, the payout can be 35% of each NEO's target. If maximum levels of performance are achieved, the payout can be 200% of each NEO’s target. The amounts actually paid to the NEOs for 2014 are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. The amounts do not include the impact of any adjustments the Compensation Committee may make to the NEO's annual incentive award based upon individual performance.
(1)
Reflects (a) stock-settled time-based RSUs awarded to each NEO in 2015 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, and (b) cash-settled time-based RSUs awarded to each NEO in 2015. The time-vested,time-based RSUs (both stock-settled restricted stock units and time-vested, cash-settled restricted stock unitsawards) granted to the NEOs in February 20142015 vest, subject to continuous employment, in four substantially equal annual installments on August 15, 2014, August 14, 2015, August 14,15, 2016, August 15, 2017 and February 15, 2017. The time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units granted to Mr. Jasek in October 2014 vest in three equal installments on November 1, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Generally, upon death, disability (as defined in the award agreement)2018. No cash dividends or a change of control (as defined in our First Amended 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan), all of the restricted stock units will accelerate and vest. In addition, if the executive’s employment with us is terminated due to a qualified retirement (as defined in the award agreement), a pro rata portion of the restricted stock units not previously forfeited will vest and the remainder will be forfeited. The pro rata portion that will vest is determined by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stockcash dividend equivalent rights are received with respect to which forfeiture restrictions would otherwise have lapsed on the next anniversary of the grant date by the fraction that results from dividing (1) the number of days elapsed (excluding the retirement date) since the most recent anniversary date by (2) 365. In order for the pro rata portion to vest on qualified retirement, the employee must meet the conditions in the award agreement by (1) providing the required notice, (2) having at least 10 years of qualified service and (3) if the employee is not at least 62 years old at the time of the

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 43

retirement, signing a non-compete agreement until age 62.outstanding time-based RSUs. See also “Potential"Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control”Control" beginning on page 4759.

(2)
Reflects the potential number of this Proxy Statement.
The February 2014 TSRs vest, if at all,performance-based RSUs awarded to each NEO in 2015 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, which awards are subject to both continued service and relative TSR vesting conditions. NEOs may earn from 0% to 100% of the target award based on our cumulative stockholder return relative to a peer groupthe TSR Performance Peer Group for a two to three-year period. Vesting of these 2014 performance-based awards are calculated using a cumulative stockholder return from March 31, 2014 throughthe performance period beginning January 1, 2015 and ending on the applicable determination date, which is the last day of each monthquarter beginning on March 31, 2016 through March2017 and ending December 31, 2017, with actual vesting dates potentially occurring quarterly from April 15, 2017 through January 15, 2018, subject to continued employment through any actual vesting date. The "Threshold" level reported in this table is based upon the lowest possible earned amount of 25% based on the payout scale described on page 47, although the minimum potential payout is zero. The "Target" and "Maximum" levels reported are based upon the highest possible earned amount of 100% based on the payout scale described on page 47. No cash
​

54        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

    dividends or cash dividend equivalent rights are received with respect to outstanding performance-based RSUs. For further details on the performance vesting requirements, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2015 Compensation Decisions – Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards" on page 46.

(3)
Reflects potential cash payouts for annual incentive awards under the 2015 AIP, as discussed beginning on page 39. The "Threshold" level reported in this table is based upon the lowest possible earned amount of 50% with respect to the Category I and Category II Company performance metrics (which collectively comprise 75% of each award) as described on pages 41-42, although the minimum potential payout is zero. The "Maximum" level reported in this table is based on the highest possible payout amount of 200% of each NEO's target award. The amounts actually paid to the NEOs for 2015 with respect to the awards reported in this column are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column. The amounts do not include any amounts potentially payable pursuant to the individual performance measure assessment portion of the annual incentive awards, which amounts are reported in the "Bonus" column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(4)
Reflects the full aggregate grant date fair value of stock-based awards granted during 2015, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, determined without regard to forfeitures, as required by SEC regulations, and does not reflect the actual vesting potentiallyvalue that may be recognized by each NEO. For the performance-based RSUs, the grant date fair value was based on a per share price of $22.85, which is determined based on the probability of achieving the performance target. For the time-based RSUs, the grant date fair value was based on a per share price of $29.43, which is the mean of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the February 11, 2015 date of grant. For assumptions made in the valuation, see also Note 14, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC and see footnote (3) to the "Summary Compensation Table" included in this Proxy Statement.
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        55

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015

The following table contains information about our NEOs' outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2015. See also "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control" beginning on page 59 for additional information regarding the treatment of these awards upon certain terminations of employment or the occurrence of a change of control.

    Option Awards  Stock Awards  

  Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options(#)
     Option
Exercise		  Option
Expiration		  Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units That
have not
Vested		  Market Value
of Shares of
Stock or
Units That
have not
Vested		  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That have not		  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That have not
 
​​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Name

 Grant Date  Exercisable (1)  Unexercisable  Price ($)  Date  (2) (#)  (3) ($)  Vested (4) (#)  Vested (5) ($)  

Mr. Boothby

 ​02/07/08 ​30,000 ​— $48.45 ​2/7/2018 ​— ​— ​— ​— 

​

 ​02/11/11 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​15,885(i)$517,216 

​

 ​02/10/12 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​15,300(ii)​498,168 

​

 ​02/08/13 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​16,425(a)$534,798 ​81,900(iii)​2,666,664 

​

 ​02/12/14 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​39,230(e)​1,277,329 ​98,040(iv)​3,192,182 

​

 ​02/11/15 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​73,396(g)​2,389,774 ​138,210(v)​4,500,118 

Mr. Massaro

  05/04/11  —  —  —  —  4,168(b)$135,710  —  — 

  02/10/12  —  —  —  —  —  —  2,340(ii)$76,190 

  02/08/13  —  —  —  —  6,000(a) 195,360  15,000(iii) 488,400 

  11/08/13  —  —  —  —  30,000(c) 976,800  —  — 

  02/12/14  —  —  —  —  16,000(e) 520,960  40,000(iv) 1,302,400 

  02/11/15  —  —  —  —  28,800(g) 937,728  54,210(v) 1,765,078 

Mr. Packer

 ​02/07/08 ​25,000 ​— $48.45 ​2/7/2018 ​— ​— ​— ​— 

​

 ​02/11/11 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​10,935(i)$356,044 

​

 ​02/10/12 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​9,270(ii)​301,831 

​

 ​02/08/13 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​9,825(a)$319,902 ​49,200(iii)​1,601,952 

​

 ​02/12/14 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​22,500(e)​732,600 ​57,000(iv)​1,855,920 

​

 ​02/11/15 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​43,178(g)​1,405,876 ​81,300(v)​2,647,128 

Mr. Dunn

  02/07/08  18,000  — $48.45  2/7/2018  —  —  —  — 

  02/11/11  —  —  —  —  —  —  2,700(i)$87,912 

  02/10/12  —  —  —  —  —  —  2,340(ii) 76,190 

  02/08/13  —  —  —  —  5,138(a)$167,293  12,600(iii) 410,256 

  02/12/14  —  —  —  —  12,000(e) 390,720  14,000(iv) 455,840 

  02/11/15  —  —  —  —  20,724(g) 674,773  26,040(v) 847,862 

Mr. Jasek

 ​02/07/08 ​25,000 ​— $48.45 ​2/7/2018 ​— ​— ​— ​— 

​

 ​02/11/11 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​2,835(i)$92,307 

​

 ​02/10/12 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​— ​1,860(ii)​60,561 

​

 ​02/08/13 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​5,250(a)$170,940 ​12,900(iii)​420,024 

​

 ​09/09/13 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​6,667(d)​217,078 ​— ​— 

​

 ​02/12/14 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​1,200(e)​39,072 ​13,500(iv)​439,560 

​

 ​10/24/14 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​27,000(f)​879,120 ​— ​— 

​

 ​02/11/15 ​— ​— ​— ​— ​17,280(g)​562,637 ​21,690(v)​706,226 
(1)
Reflects stock options that were awarded to the NEOs (other than Mr. Massaro) on February 7, 2008. All of the stock options were granted under our 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan. Subject to continuous employment, the stock options vested in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. If the optionee's employment with us is terminated due to death or disability, the options may be exercised in full for one year after the termination, after which time the options will terminate. If the optionee's employment with us is terminated voluntarily by the optionee or involuntarily by us for cause (as defined in the award agreement), the options will terminate immediately and not be exercisable. Subject to earlier termination or expiration, if the optionee's employment is terminated by us involuntarily other than for cause, the vested portion of the option may be exercised for 90 days after the termination (or for one year after death if the employee dies during the 90-day period).

(2)
Reflects the following time-based RSUs that were awarded to the NEOs:

(a)
Time-based, stock-settled RSUs awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 8, 2013, which vest in four equal installments on August 15, 2013, 2014 and 2015 and February 1, 2016.

(b)
Time-based, stock-settled RSUs awarded to Mr. Massaro in connection with his new employment with us on May 4, 2011, which vest in three equal annual installments, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date.
​

56        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

    (c)
    Time-based, stock-settled RSUs awarded to Mr. Massaro in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on November 8, 2013, which vest in three equal annual installments, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date.

    (d)
    Time-based, stock-settled RSUs awarded to Mr. Jasek on September 9, 2013, which vest in three equal annual installments on August 15, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

    (e)
    Time-based RSUs (50% stock-settled and 50% cash-settled) awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 12, 2014, which vest in four equal installments on August 15, 2014, 2015 and 2016 and February 1, 2017.

    (f)
    Time-based, stock-settled RSUs awarded to Mr. Jasek on October 24, 2014, which vest in three equal annual installments on November 1, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

    (g)
    Time-based RSUs (50% stock-settled and 50% cash-settled) awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 11, 2015, which vest in four equal installments on August 15, 2015, 2016 and 2017 and February 15, 2018.

(3)
Calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock units that have not vested by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2015, which was $32.56.

(4)
Reflects the following performance-based RSUs that were awarded to the NEOs under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan (except where otherwise indicated):

(i)
Performance-based RSUs awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 11, 2011 under our 2009 Omnibus Stock Plan, which vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2011 performance-based RSUs has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2014 through April 15, 2016.

(ii)
Performance-based RSUs awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 10, 2012, which vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2012 performance-based RSUs has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2015 through April 15, 2017.

(iii)
Performance-based RSUs awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 8, 2013, which vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2013 performance-based RSUs has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2016 through April 15, 2018.

(iv)
Performance-based RSUs awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 12, 2014, which vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a one-year period. Vesting of these 2014 performance-based RSUs has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2016 through April 15, 2017.

(v)
Performance-based RSUs awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 11, 2015, which vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to the TSR Performance Peer Group over a one-year period. Vesting of these 2015 performance-based RSUs has the possibility of occurring quarterly from April 15, 2017 through January 15, 2018. For further details on the performance vesting requirements, see “Compensation"Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2014 Performance Analysis and2015 Compensation Decisions”Decisions – Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards" on page 3346.

      For each outstanding award of this Proxy Statement.

Outstanding Equity Awards atperformance-based RSUs, reflects the maximum number of performance-based RSUs that remain subject to such award, which is equal to 100% of the number of awarded performance-based RSUs that remain outstanding.

(5)
Calculated by multiplying the number of performance-based RSUs reported in the preceding column by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 20142015, which was $32.56.
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        57

Table of Contents

Stock Vested in 2015

The following table contains information regarding the vesting during 2015 of time-based and performance-based RSUs previously granted to our NEOs.

 
 Stock Awards 
Name
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting(1) (#)		 Value Realized on
Vesting(2) ($)		 

Mr. Boothby

 ​129,300 $4,579,883 

Mr. Massaro

  36,326 $1,318,543 

Mr. Packer

 ​79,077 $2,789,196 

Mr. Dunn

  30,583 $1,086,159 

Mr. Jasek

 ​29,167 $1,032,116 
(1)
Represents the gross number of shares acquired upon vesting of time-based and performance-based RSUs during 2015, without reduction for any shares withheld to satisfy applicable tax obligations. In addition, includes time-based, cash-settled RSUs that were awarded on February 12, 2014 and February 11, 2015, portions of which vested on August 15, 2015 for Messrs. Boothby (includes 22,040 cash-settled RSUs), Massaro (includes 8,800 cash-settled RSUs), Packer (includes 12,821 cash-settled RSUs), Dunn (includes 6,453 cash-settled RSUs) and Jasek (includes 3,180 cash-settled RSUs).

(2)
Represents the value of the time-based or performance-based RSUs that vested during 2015, calculated by multiplying (a) the number of shares of time-based or performance-based RSUs that vested or, with respect to cash-settled RSUs, the equivalent number of shares used to calculate the cash payment by (b) the mean of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the applicable vesting date or, if the vesting date is not a trading day on the NYSE, the previous trading day.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table contains information about our NEOs’ outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2014.NEOs' participation in our Deferred Compensation Plan during 2015.

Name
 Executive
Contributions
in 2015(1) ($)		 Registrant
Contributions
in 2015(2) ($)		 Aggregate
Earnings
in 2015 ($)		 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($)		 Aggregate
Balance at
December 31,
2015(3) ($)		 

Mr. Boothby

 $462,615 $52,615 $(68,761)​— $2,660,709 

Mr. Massaro

  —  — $2,941  — $107,423 

Mr. Packer

 $26,924 $26,924 $3,723 ​— $462,215 

Mr. Dunn

 $13,777 $13,777 $1,517  — $241,967 

Mr. Jasek

 $15,231 $15,231 $1,090 ​— $153,101 
   Option Awards Stock Awards
   Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options(#) 		        
NameGrant
Date		 Exercisable Unexercisable Option
Exercise
Price ($)		 Option
Expiration
Date		 Number of
Shares
of Stock or
Units That
have not
Vested (#)		 
Market Value
of Shares of
Stock or Units
That have not
Vested(1) ($)
 
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That have not
Vested(2) (#)
 
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That have not
Vested(1) ($)
Mr. Boothby02/07/08 
   30,000(3)

   $48.45
 2/7/2018
 —
 —
 —
 —
 02/04/10 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   26,100(4)

 $707,832
 02/11/11 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   35,300(5)

 957,336
 02/10/12 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   10,200(6)

 $276,624
 
   51,000(7)

 1,383,120
 02/08/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
32,850(8)

 890,892
 
81,900(9)

 2,221,128
 02/12/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
58,846(13)

 1,595,904
 
98,040(14)

 2,658,845
Mr. Massaro05/04/11 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   8,334(10)

 $226,018
 —
 —
 02/10/12 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   3,100(6)

 84,072
 
   7,800(7)

 $211,536
 02/08/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
12,000(8)

 325,440
 
15,000(9)

 406,800
 11/08/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
30,000(11)

 813,600
 —
 —
 02/12/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
24,000(13)

 650,880
 
40,000(14)

 1,084,800
Mr. Packer02/07/08 
   25,000(3)

 —
 $48.45
 2/7/2018
 —
 —
 —
 —
 02/04/10 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   18,300(4)

 $496,296
 02/11/11 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   24,300(5)

 659,016
 02/10/12 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   6,175(6)

 $167,466
 
  30,900(7)

 838,008
 02/08/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
19,650(8)

 532,908
 
49,200(9)

 1,334,304
 02/12/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
33,750(13)

 915,300
 
57,000(14)

 1,545,840
Mr. Dunn02/07/08 
   18,000(3)

   $48.45
 2/7/2018
 —
 —
 —
 —
 02/04/10 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   5,100(4)

 $138,312
 02/11/11 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   6,000(5)

 162,720
 02/10/12 —
 —
 —
 —
 
   3,100(6)

 $84,072
 
   7,800(7)

 211,536
 02/08/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
10,275(8)

 278,658
 
12,600(9)

 341,712
 02/12/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
18,000(13)

 488,160
 
14,000(14)

 379,680
Mr. Jasek02/07/08 
 25,000(3)

 —
 $48.45
 2/7/2018
 —
 —
 —
 —
 02/04/10 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
4,575(4)

 $124,074
 02/11/11 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
6,300(5)

 170,856
 02/10/12 —
 —
 —
 —
 
2,475(6)

 $67,122
 
6,200(7)

 168,144
 02/08/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
10,500(8)

 284,760
 
12,900(9)

 349,848
 09/09/13 —
 —
 —
 —
 
13,334(12)

 361,618
 —
 —
 02/12/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
1,800(13)

 48,816
 
13,500(14)

 366,120
 10/24/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
27,000(15)

 732,240
 —
 —
___________________
(1)Calculated by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock units that have not vested by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2014 of $27.12.
(2)Reflects the maximum number of restricted stock units covered by each award.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY -
(1)
All amounts are included in the "Salary," "Bonus" or "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns for 2015 Proxy Statement 44
in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)Reflects stock options that were awarded to the NEOs on February 7, 2008. All of the stock options were granted under our 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan. Subject to continuous employment, the stock options granted to Messrs. Boothby, Packer and Dunn in February 2008 vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. If their employment with us is terminated due to death or disability, the options may be exercised in full
(2)
Reflects amounts that we contributed under our Deferred Compensation Plan as a matching contribution for the benefit of each NEO for 2015. These amounts are included in the "All Other Compensation" column for one year after the termination, after which time the options will terminate. If they terminate their respective employment with us voluntarily or if employment is terminated involuntarily for cause (as defined in the award agreement), the options will terminate immediately and not be exercisable. Subject to earlier termination or expiration, if their respective employment with us terminates involuntarily other than for cause, the vested portion of the option may be exercised for 90 days after the termination (or for one year after death if the employee dies during the 90-day period). Pursuant to the terms of the 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan, their stock options will vest in full upon a change of control.
(4)Reflects performance-based, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 4, 2010 under our 2009 Omnibus Stock Plan. These performance-based awards vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2010 performance-based awards has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2013 through April 15, 2015.
(5)Reflects performance-based, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 11, 2011 under our 2009 Omnibus Stock Plan. These performance-based awards vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2011 performance-based awards has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2014 through April 15, 2016.
(6)Reflects time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 10, 2012 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These restricted stock units vest in four equal annual installments on August 15, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
(7)Reflects performance-based, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 10, 2012 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These performance-based awards vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2012 performance-based awards has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2015 through April 15, 2017.
(8)These awards are time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 8, 2013 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These restricted stock units vest in four equal installments on August 15, 2013, 2014 and 2015 and February 1, 2016.
(9)Reflects performance-based, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 8, 2013 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These performance-based awards vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a two-year period. These performance-based awards vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a three to five-year period. Vesting of these 2013 performance-based awards has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2016 through April 15, 2018.
(10)Reflects time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Mr. Massaro in connection with his new employment on May 4, 2011 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These restricted stock units vest in three equal annual installments, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(11)Reflects time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Mr. Massaro in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on November 8, 2013 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These restricted stock units vest in three equal annual installments, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(12)Reflects time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Mr. Jasek on September 9, 2013 under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These restricted stock units vest in three equal annual installments on August 15, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
(13)Reflects time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units (50%) and time-vested, cash-settled restricted stock units (50%) that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 12, 2014 under our First Amended 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. See “Grants of Plan-Based Equity Awards in 2014” above for the terms of these awards.
(14)Reflects performance-based, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Messrs. Boothby, Massaro, Packer, Dunn and Jasek on February 12, 2014 under our First Amended 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These performance-based awards vest, if at all, based on our total stockholder return relative to a peer group over a one-year period. Vesting of these 2014 performance-based awards has the possibility of occurring monthly from April 15, 2016 through April 15, 2017. For details on the performance vesting requirements, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2014 Performance Analysis and Compensation Decisions” on page 33 of this Proxy Statement.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 45

(15)Reflects time-vested, stock-settled restricted stock units that were awarded to Mr. Jasek on October 24, 2014 under our First Amended 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. These restricted stock units vest in three equal annual installments on November 1, 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested in 2014
the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)
The following table contains information regardingamounts reported in this column have also been reported in the exercise of stock options by our NEOs during 2014Summary Compensation Table in previous years for each NEO: (a) Mr. Boothby – $1,879,422, (b) Mr. Massaro – $80,698, (c) Mr. Packer – $270,066, (d) Mr. Dunn – $120,464, and the vesting during 2014 of restricted stock and restricted stock units previously granted to our NEOs.(e) Mr. Jasek – 55,456.
 
Option Awards 
 
Stock Awards 
Name
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise(1) (#)
 
Value
Realized on
Exercise(2) ($)
 
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(3) (#)
 
Value
Realized on
Vesting(4) ($)
Mr. Boothby—
 —
 77,705 $2,907,229
Mr. Massaro—
 —
 23,766 $940,542
Mr. Packer—
 —
 49,117 $1,821,962
Mr. Dunn—
 —
 19,038 $722,834
Mr. Jasek—
 —
 19,816 $751,817
___________________
(1)Represents the gross number of shares acquired upon exercise of vested options, without taking into account any shares withheld to cover the option exercise price or applicable tax obligations.
(2)Represents the value of the exercised options, calculated by multiplying (a) the number of shares to which the option exercise related by (b) the difference between the actual market price of our common stock at the time of exercise and the option exercise price.
(3)Represents the gross number of shares acquired upon vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units, without taking into account any shares withheld to satisfy applicable tax obligations. In addition, includes time-vested, cash-settled restricted stock unit awards that were awarded on February 12, 2014, portions of which vested on August 15, 2014 for Messrs. Boothby (includes 9,807 cash-settled shares), Massaro (includes 4,000 cash-settled shares), Packer (includes 5,625 cash-settled shares), Dunn (includes 3,000 cash-settled shares) and Jasek (includes 300 cash-settled shares).
(4)Represents the value of the vested restricted stock or restricted stock units, calculated by multiplying (a) the number of vested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units, or with respect to cash-settled restricted stock units, the equivalent number of shares used to calculate the cash payment by (b) the mean of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the vesting date or, if the vesting date is not a trading day on the NYSE, the previous trading day.

    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
    The following table contains information about our NEOs’ nonqualified deferred compensation at December 31, 2014.
    Name 
    Executive
    Contributions in
    2014    (1) ($)
    		 
    Registrant
    Contributions in
    2014    (2) ($)
    		 Aggregate
    Earnings
    in 2014 ($)    		 
    Aggregate
    Withdrawals/
    Distributions    (3) ($)
    		 Aggregate
    Balance at
    December 31,
    2014 ($)
    Mr. Boothby
    (4) 
    		$170,500
    		 $50,500
    		 $(2,866) —
    		 $2,214,239
    Mr. Massaro
    (4) 
    		$16,099
    		 $16,099
    		 $8,777
    		 —
    		 $104,481
    Mr. Packer
    (4) 
    		$25,760
    		 $25,760
    		 $24,684
    		 —
    		 $412,092
    Mr. Dunn
    (4) 
    		$13,008
    		 $13,008
    		 $19,540
    		 —
    		 $212,897
    Mr. Jasek
    (4) 
    		$11,035
    		 $11,035
    		 $6,125
    		 —
    		 $121,550
    ___________________
    (1)All amounts are included in the Salary or Current Bonus columns for 2014 in the Summary Compensation Table.
    (2)Reflects amounts that we contributed under our Deferred Compensation Plan as a matching contribution for the benefit of each NEO. These amounts are included in the All Other Compensation column for 2014 in the Summary Compensation Table.
    (3)All amounts reflect regularly scheduled installments of previous long-term cash awards pursuant to our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan.
    (4)Reflects amounts relating to our Deferred Compensation Plan.

    NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 46

    Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan

Our Deferred Compensation Plan allows an eligible employee to defer up to 90% of his or her salary and all of his or her bonus on an annual basis. We make a matching contribution forof up to 8% of the employee’semployee's salary. Our contribution with respect to any particular employee under the Deferred Compensation Plan is reduced to the extent that we make contributions to our 401(k) Plan on behalf of that employee. The NEOs are always fully vested in all amounts credited to their account under the Deferred Compensation Plan, including amounts contributed by us. Effective January 1, 2007, we established an irrevocable rabbi trust to hold employee account balances under our Deferred Compensation Plan. Employee account balances reflect hypothetical investments,

​

58        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

at the direction of each employee, in substantially the same investment alternatives, including (as of November 6, 2008) our common stock, as are available under our 401(k) Plan. Accordingly, earnings on account balances are based upon the market returns on the hypothetical investment alternatives selected by the employee participants. Payments must begin at separation from service; provided, however, that officers must generally wait six months after separation from service for distributions to begin. Upon separation from service for any reason, payments will be made on the schedule (lump-sum or installment payments) elected by the participant at the time their deferral election is submitted. All payments are made in accordance withcash, except for amounts hypothetically invested in our common stock, which may be paid in cash or our common stock, at the participant’s elections.election of the committee administering the plan. Distributions due to financial hardship, as determined by the plan committee (as defined inthat administers the plan)plan, are permitted but other unscheduled withdrawals are not allowed. In the event of a change of control, the Compensation & Management Development Committee has the authority to terminate the plan within the 30 days preceding or 12 months after a change of control and, in the event of such a termination, each participant’sparticipant's account will be distributed within 12 months of the termination. See “Potential"Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control”Control" below.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

This section describes the potential payments or benefits upon termination, change of control or other post-employment scenarios for each of our NEOs.

    Change of Control Severance Agreements. 

None of our NEOs have employment contracts; however, we have entered into change of control severance agreements with all of our NEOs. The agreements have an initial term of either two or three years (depending on(two years, in the officer)case of Mr. Jasek), with automatic daily extensions unless our Board takes action to cease the automatic extensions. The agreementsEach agreement (other than the agreement with Mr. Massaro) is currently are in the extension periodsperiod and will remain in effect for either two or three years (depending on(two years, in the officer)case of Mr. Jasek) after the Board provides the officer notice of termination of his agreement, if and when the Board decides to do so. Mr. Massaro's agreement, which was originally effective December 19, 2014, was amended and restated effective February 10, 2016, with a three year term commencing on the effective date of the amended and restated agreement and automatic daily extensions unless our Board takes action to cease the automatic extensions, in which case Mr. Massaro's agreement will terminate on the third anniversary of date the Board gives notice of termination of his agreement. Mr. Massaro's amended and restated agreement changed the cash multiplier under his agreement from two and one-half (2.5) to three (3) and changed the protected period under his agreement from 30 months to 36 months following a change of control, in order to align his severance benefits with those provided to other executive officers at Mr. Massaro's same employment level.

The agreements generally provide for a severance protection period that begins on the date of a change"change of controlcontrol" of our Company and ends on either the second or third36 month anniversary of that date depending on(on the officer (certain circumstances may cause an extension24 month anniversary of that date, in the period)case of Mr. Jasek). During the protected period, if the executive’sexecutive's employment is terminated by us without cause"cause" or by the executive for good"good reason," the agreements provide for the following severance benefits:

a lump sum cash payment equal

Lump Sum Cash
Severance Payment

Continued Health Coverage

Outplacement Services

​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​
​  Equal to either two or three times (two times, in the case of Mr. Jasek) the sum of (a) the greater of the executive's base salary prior to the change of control or at any time thereafter and (b) one-half of the greater of the executive's cash bonus compensation for the two years ending prior to the change of control or for the two years ending prior to the executive's termination of employment​Payment of the applicable premiums for COBRA continuation coverage or retiree medical coverage, as applicable, for the executive and his covered dependents for 36 months (24 months, in the case of Mr. Jasek), plus an amount to reimburse the executive for all applicable income taxes related to such payments, to the extent the executive and his dependents are eligible for and elect such continuation or retiree medical coverage​Reasonable outplacement services in an amount not exceeding $30,000​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        59

Table of (a) the greater of the executive’s base salary prior to the change of control or at any time thereafter and (b) one-half of the greater of the executive’s cash bonus compensation for the two years ending prior to the change of control or for the two years ending prior to the executive’s termination of employment;

full vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options (vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options also is covered under our omnibus stock plans);
health coverage at active benefit levels for either two or three years (health benefits are to be offset by any health benefits the executive receives from subsequent employment and a cash payment may be made by us in lieu of providing coverage if the executive is not eligible for the coverage or if the health benefits provided would be taxable to the executive); and
outplacement services for either two or three years (or until the executive begins full-time employment with a new employer, if earlier) in an amount not exceeding $30,000.
Contents

If the executive is terminated by us for failure to perform the executive’sexecutive's duties for at least 180 days due to physical or mental illness, the executive will not be eligible to receive the severance benefits do not apply.

A “changedescribed above.

For purposes of control” means:

the change of control severance agreements, the following terms are generally defined as set forth below:

    •
    "Cause" means (i) willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties; (ii) conviction of or plea of nolo contendre to a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; (iii) willful engagement in gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to us; (iv) material violation of any of our material policies; or (v) the executive is the subject of an order obtained or issued by the SEC for any securities violation involving fraud.

    •
    "Change of control" means (i) we are not the survivor in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization (or survive only as a subsidiary);
(ii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation with another entity pursuant to which less than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the survivor will be issued in respect of our capital stock;
(iii) we sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of our assets;
(iv) we are to be dissolved and liquidated;
(v) any person acquires ownership or control (including the power to vote) of more than 50% of the shares of our voting stock (based upon voting power); or
(vi) as a result of or in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were our directors before the election cease to constitute a majority of our Board.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 47

However, a change"change of controlcontrol" does not include any merger, consolidation, reorganization, sale, lease, exchange, or similar transaction solely between us and one or more entities that were wholly owned by us immediately prior to the event.
“event or any event that is not a "change in control" pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.

•
"Good reason” means:
reason" means (i) a material reduction in the executive’sexecutive's authority, duties, titles, status or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to a change of control or the assignment to the executive of duties or responsibilities inconsistent in any material respect from those previously in effect;
effect immediately prior to a change of control; (ii) any reduction in the executive’sexecutive's base salary;
(iii) any failure to provide the executive with a combined total of base salary and bonus compensation at a level at least equal to the combined total of (a) the executive’sexecutive's base salary immediately prior to the change of control and (b) one-half of the total of all cash bonuses (current and long-term)(whether paid or deferred) awarded to the executive for the two most recent years ending prior to the change of control;
control (deferral of payments without the executives consent and payment in a form other than cash, among other things, may constitute such a failure); (iv) we fail to obtain a written agreement from any successor to assume and perform the agreements; or
(v) relocation of our principal executive offices by more than 50 miles from their location immediately prior to the change of control or the executive is based at any office other than our principal executive offices.
“Cause” means:
willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties;
conviction of or plea of nolo contendre to a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude;
willful engagement in gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to us;
material violation of any of our material policies; or
the executive is the subject of an order obtained or issued by the SEC for any securities violation involving fraud.

If the payment of benefits under the agreement or otherwise results in the executive being subject to parachute payment excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code, we must make an additional payment to the executive (other than Mr. Massaro) in an amount such that after the payment of all income and excise taxes, the executive will be in the same net after-tax position as if no parachute paymentsuch excise taxes had been imposed. We do not provide for excise tax gross ups in connection with a change of control in any executive officer agreements entered into after January 2009, and it is our policy not to include any such tax gross up in any future executive officer agreements. Mr. Massaro's change of control severance agreement does not provide for an excise tax gross up and instead provides that if an excise tax is triggered, then the severance benefits shall either be (1) reduced so that benefits would not trigger an excise tax or (2) paid in full, whichever produces the better net after-tax position to Mr. Massaro.

Receipt of benefits under the agreement (other than the vestingchange of stock awards)control severance agreements is subject to the executive’sexecutive's execution of a comprehensive release, which contains non-disparagement provisions and a confidentiality agreement. If a dispute arises, the agreement provides for binding arbitration at our expense (unless the arbitrator provides otherwise with respect to the executive’sexecutive's expenses).

Omnibus Stock Plans​

60        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    . Under|    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

    Outstanding Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards

As of December 31, 2015, our 2000, 2009 and 2011 Omnibus Stock Plans, unvestedNEOs held outstanding stock options and sharesoutstanding time-based and performance-based RSUs. All outstanding stock options held by our NEOs were granted under our 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan, and all such options were fully vested as of restrictedDecember 31, 2015. Please see footnote (1) to the "Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015" table for a discussion of the exercise periods applicable to outstanding stock option awards upon certain termination of employment events.

Outstanding time-based (both stock-settled and restricted stock units willcash-settled) and performance-based RSUs held by our NEOs become fully vest and become nonforfeitable uponvested at 100% in the event of a change of control (as defined in the plans).control. For purposes of the 2000, 2009 and 2011 Omnibus Stock Plans,these awards, the definition of change"change of controlcontrol" is substantially the same as the definition under the change of control severance agreements described above.

In the case of termination of an NEO's employment due to death or disability, stock options will fully vesttime-based RSUs (both stock-settled and remain exercisable for one year, and shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units willcash-settled) fully vest and become nonforfeitable.

Subject In the event an NEO's employment terminates by reason of a qualified retirement, then a pro-rata portion of the time-based RSUs held by the executive on the date of termination will vest (calculated by multiplying the number awards that would have vested on the next vesting date by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that have elapsed since the most recent vesting date and the numerator of which is 365). A "qualified retirement" is defined in the RSU award agreements as (i) either (A) reaching at least age 60 and signing a non-compete that is effective until reaching age 62 or (B) reaching at least age 62, (ii) having at least 10 years of qualified service (as defined in the applicable plan and award agreement), and (iii) providing proper notice (as outlined in the applicable award agreement). None of our NEOs is currently eligible for "qualified retirement" under the equity awards.

While performance-based RSUs are not forfeited upon an NEO's termination of employment due to earlierdeath, disability, or a qualified retirement, such awards only vest in those scenarios based on our actual performance during the applicable performance period.

Certain amounts payable on a termination or expiration,of employment and described above will be delayed until six months following the NEO's termination of employment in compliance with Section 409A of the Code. In the case of a termination of employment by us other than for cause (as defined in the award agreements), stock options generally will remain exercisable for three months after the termination to the extent then exercisable. The definitions of cause in the award agreements are comparable to the definition under the change of control severance agreementsthose described above.

In the case of any other termination, unexercised stock options andabove, unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unitsRSUs will be forfeited except as described below in the case of a qualified retirement (as defined in the award agreements). None of our NEOs are eligible for “qualified retirement” under the equity awards.
forfeited.

Deferred

    Other Compensation PlanPlans. 

Upon termination of employment with us, our NEOs are entitled to full payment of their account balances in our Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan in the form previously selected by the member in their payment election. See “Nonqualified"Nonqualified Deferred Compensation”Compensation" beginning on page 4658.

Upon a change of this Proxy Statement.control, the performance period applicable to the annual incentive awards under our Annual Incentive Plan is deemed to end of the date of the change of control, and eligible employees are entitled to payment of a pro-rata annual incentive award based on actual performance through the date of the change of control.

    Post-Employment Tables.

The following tables describe potential payments or benefits upon termination, change of control or other post-employment scenarios for each of the NEOs. The following tables generally do not include amounts payable pursuant to plans that are available generally to all salaried employees. The amounts in the tables show only the value of amounts payable or benefits due to enhancements in connection with each scenario, and do not reflect amounts otherwise payable or benefits otherwise due as a result of employment. There would be no amounts payable or benefits due to enhancements solely in connection with (1) an involuntary termination for cause, (2) an involuntary termination not for cause or (3) a voluntary termination of a non-retirement eligible


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 48

executive. Accordingly, no amounts are shown for those scenarios. The actual amounts to be paid out in any scenario can only be determined at the time of such executive officer’sofficer's actual separation from Newfield.

The following assumptions apply to the tables:

    •
    For all scenarios, the trigger event is assumed to be December 31, 2014.
“2015.​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        61

Table of Contents

    •
    "Cash Severance Payment”Payment" only includes the cash payment based on base salary and bonus, as described under “Change"Change of Control Severance Agreements”.Agreements." All other amounts and adjustments mandated by the change of control severance agreements and COC Plan are shown in connection with the associated other benefits included in the tables.
For Mr. Massaro, although his amended and restated change of control severance agreement did not become effective until February 10, 2016, the amounts included in the table below are based on the terms of his amended and restated agreement as if it were in effect as of December 31, 2015.

•
Vested stock options restricted stock and restricted stock unitsRSUs are not included in these tables since they are already vested.


•
For all scenarios, the amounts for restricted stock and restricted stock unitsRSUs that are unvested and accelerated are calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of restricted stock or unvested restricted stock unitsRSUs by $27.12$32.56 (the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2014)2015).


•
The amounts included below for health coverage are the estimated cost to us to provideCOBRA premiums for the existing medical and dental benefits to each eligible executive for either the two-year or three-yearapplicable time period specified in the executive’sexecutive's change of control severance agreement, if both a change of control and a termination occur as required byplus the change of control severance agreements.
related tax reimbursement amount.

•
The outplacement placement services amounts represent the maximum benefits available to each eligible executive under their change of control severance agreements.

Deferred Compensation Plan amounts payable in connection with the various scenarios are not shown in the tables below because these amounts are disclosed earlier in the Nonqualified"Nonqualified Deferred CompensationCompensation" table on page 46.

58. In addition, no amounts are shown as payable under the 2015 AIP upon a change of control because those amounts are disclosed earlier in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column of the "Summary Compensation Table" for 2015.

Mr. Boothby Retirement ($) Long-Term
Disability ($)		 Death ($) Change of Control
(With Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason) ($)		 Change of Control
(No Termination) ($)		 Retirement ($) Disability ($) Death ($) Change of
Control With
Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason ($)		 Change of
Control (No
Termination) ($)		 
Cash Severance Payment    N/A —
 —
 $5,070,000
 —
 N/A ​— ​— ​6,525,000 ​— 
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated    N/A $10,691,680
 $10,691,680
 $10,691,680
 $10,691,680
Option Awards Unvested and Accelerated    N/A —
 —
 —
 —

Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated

 N/A 15,576,248 15,576,248 15,576,248 15,576,248 
Health Coverage    N/A —
 —
 $113,107
 —
 N/A ​— ​— ​128,062 ​— 
Placement Services    N/A —
 —
 $30,000
 —
 N/A — — 30,000 — 
Excise Tax Gross-Up(2)
    N/A    N/A    N/A $5,192,366
 —
 N/A ​N/A ​N/A ​7,655,473 ​— 
​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
Total    N/A $10,691,680
 $10,691,680
 $21,097,154
 $10,691,680
 N/A 15,576,248 15,576,248 29,914,784 15,576,248 
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​
​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​
​

62        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents


Mr. Massaro Retirement ($) 
Long-Term
Disability ($) 
 Death ($) Change of Control
(With Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason) ($)		 Change of Control
(No Termination) ($)		 Retirement ($) Disability ($) Death ($) Change of
Control With
Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason ($)		 Change of
Control (No
Termination) ($)		 
Cash Severance Payment    N/A —
 —
 $2,087,500
 —
 N/A ​— ​— ​3,420,000 ​— 
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated    N/A $3,803,146
 $3,803,146
 $3,803,146
 $3,803,146
Option Awards Unvested and Accelerated    N/A —
 —
 —
 —

Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated

 N/A 6,398,626 6,398,626 6,398,626 6,398,626 
Health Coverage    N/A —
 —
 $113,107
 —
 N/A ​— ​— ​128,062 ​— 
Placement Services    N/A —
 —
 $30,000
 —
 N/A — — 30,000 — 
Excise Tax Gross-Up    N/A    N/A    N/A —
 —

Excise Tax Gross-Up (2)

 N/A ​N/A ​N/A ​— ​— 
​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​
Total    N/A $3,803,146
 $3,803,146
 $6,033,754
 $3,803,146
 N/A 6,398,626 6,398,626 9,976,688 6,398,626 
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​
​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​



Mr. Packer
 Retirement ($) Disability ($) Death ($) Change of
Control With
Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason ($)		 Change of
Control (No
Termination) ($)		 

Cash Severance Payment

 N/A ​— ​— ​4,153,500 ​— 

Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated

 N/A  9,221,252  9,221,252  9,221,252  9,221,252 

Health Coverage

 N/A ​— ​— ​128,062 ​— 

Placement Services

 N/A  —  —  30,000  — 

Excise Tax Gross-Up (2)

 N/A ​N/A ​N/A ​4,142,561 ​— 
​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total

 N/A  9,221,252  9,221,252  17,675,376  9,221,252 
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​


​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    492016 PROXY STATEMENT        63

Table of Contents


Mr. Packer Retirement ($) Long-Term
Disability ($)		 Death ($) Change of Control
(With Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason) ($)		 Change of Control
(No Termination) ($)
Cash Severance Payment    N/A —
 —
 $3,347,250
 —
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated    N/A $6,489,138
 $6,489,138
 $6,489,138
 $6,489,138
Option Awards Unvested and Accelerated    N/A —
 —
 —
 —
Health Coverage    N/A —
 —
 $113,107
 —
Placement Services    N/A —
 —
 $30,000
 —
Excise Tax Gross-Up    N/A    N/A    N/A —
 —
Total    N/A $6,489,138
 $6,489,138
 $9,979,496
 $6,489,138
Mr. Dunn
 Retirement ($) Disability ($) Death ($) Change of
Control With
Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason ($)		 Change of
Control (No
Termination) ($)		 

Cash Severance Payment

 N/A ​— ​— ​2,640,000 ​— 

Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated

 N/A  3,110,848  3,110,848  3,110,848  3,110,848 

Health Coverage (1)

 N/A ​— ​— ​10,915 ​— 

Placement Services

 N/A  —  —  30,000  — 

Excise Tax Gross-Up (2)

 N/A ​N/A ​N/A ​— ​— 
​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total

 N/A  3,110,848  3,110,848  5,791,762  3,110,848 
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​


Mr. Jasek
 Retirement ($) Disability ($) Death ($) Change of
Control With
Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason ($)		 Change of
Control (No
Termination) ($)		 

Cash Severance Payment

 N/A ​— ​— ​1,710,000 ​— 

Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated

 N/A  3,587,526  3,587,526  3,587,526  3,587,526 

Health Coverage

 N/A ​— ​— ​85,375 ​— 

Placement Services

 N/A  —  —  30,000  — 

Excise Tax Gross-Up (2)

 N/A ​N/A ​N/A ​— ​— 
​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​

Total

 N/A  3,587,526  3,587,526  5,412,901  3,587,526 
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​ ​​​ ​

Mr. Dunn Retirement ($) Long-Term
Disability ($)		 Death ($) Change of Control
(With Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason) ($)		 Change of Control
(No Termination) ($)
Cash Severance Payment    N/A —
 —
 $2,137,500
 —
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated    N/A $2,084,850
 $2,084,850
 $2,084,850
 $2,084,850
Option Awards Unvested and Accelerated    N/A —
 —
 —
 —
Health Coverage(1)  
    N/A —
 —
 $13,901
 —
Placement Services    N/A —
 —
 $30,000
 —
Excise Tax Gross-Up    N/A    N/A    N/A —
 —
Total    N/A $2,084,850
 $2,084,850
 $4,266,251
 $2,084,850

Mr. Jasek Retirement ($) 
Long-Term
Disability ($) 
 Death ($) Change of Control
(With Involuntary
Termination or
Voluntary
Termination For
Good Reason) ($)		 Change of Control
(No Termination) ($)
Cash Severance Payment    N/A —
 —
 $1,475,000
 —
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units Unvested and Accelerated    N/A $2,673,598
 $2,673,598
 $2,673,598
 $2,673,598
Option Awards Unvested and Accelerated    N/A —
 —
 —
 —
Health Coverage    N/A —
 —
 $72,571
 —
Placement Services    N/A —
 —
 $30,000
 —
Excise Tax Gross-Up    N/A    N/A    N/A —
 —
Total    N/A $2,673,598
 $2,673,598
 $4,251,169
 $2,673,598
___________________
(1)
(1)
Mr. Dunn is the only NEO who was retirement eligible under the retiree medical plan as of December 31, 2015. Under the Change of Control (With Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Termination for Good Reason) scenario for Mr. Dunn, the amount shown is net of employee contributions. No amounts are shown under the retirement scenario because the benefit is nondiscriminatory.

(2)
The gross-up for the excise tax is with respect to the cash severance payment, any RSUs that become vested upon change of control, the continued health coverage and the outplacement services, all assuming a change of control occurred on December 31, 2015. The 20% excise tax is only triggered if the present value of the listed benefits is equal to or greater than three times the average of the prior five years W-2 pay, and the excise tax is then imposed on the total amount of the benefits listed that are in excess of the average of the prior five years W-2 pay. Accordingly, the amounts are shown only for the NEOs whose benefits trigger the 20% excise tax gross-up and who are otherwise entitled to receive such a gross-up payment. To determine the appropriate gross-up for excise tax for Messrs. Boothby and Packer, the only NEO who was retirement eligible under the medical plan as of December 31, 2014. Under the Change of Control (With Involuntary Termination or Voluntary Termination for Good Reason) scenario for Mr. Dunn, the amount shown is net of employee contributions. No amounts are shown under the retirement scenario because the benefit is nondiscriminatory.
(2)The gross-up for the excise tax is with respect to the cash severance payment, the long-term cash awards that become vested upon change of control, the restricted stock and restricted stock units that become vested upon change of control, the continued health coverage and the outplacement services, all assuming a change of control occurred on December 31, 2014. The 20% excise tax is only triggered if the present value of the listed benefits is equal to or greater than three times the average of the prior five years W-2 pay, and the excise tax is then imposed on the total amount of the benefits listed that are in excess of the average of the prior five years W-2 pay. Accordingly, the amounts are shown only for the NEOs whose benefits trigger the 20% excise tax gross-up. To determine the appropriate gross-up for excise tax for Mr. Boothby, the

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 50

following tax rates were used: 39.6% federal, 0% state, 20% excise and 2.35% Medicare and 1.188% itemization deduction phase out. Payments to Messrs. PackerDunn and DunnJasek would not trigger a gross-up for excise tax. Mr. Massaro’sMassaro's payments would trigger an excise tax of $734,697;$1,328,976, in the event of a termination associated with a change of control, and $613,363, in the event of a change of control without a termination; however, Mr. Massaro is not entitled to a “gross-up”"gross-up" for these taxes. Instead, Mr. Massaro's Severance Agreementchange of control severance agreement provides that if an excise tax is triggered, then the severance benefits shall either be (1) reduced so that benefits would not trigger an excise tax or (2) paid in full, whichever produces the better net after-tax position. In this case, the benefits would be paid in full to Mr. Massaro.
COMPENSATION  & MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation & Management Development Committee has reviewed and discussed with Newfield’s management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K included in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation & Management Development Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of Newfield that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
This report is submitted on behalf of the Compensation & Management Development Committee.
John Randolph Kemp III, Chair
Pamela J. Gardner
Steven W. Nance
Howard H. Newman
Richard K. Stoneburner
The foregoing Compensation & Management Development Committee Report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

​

64        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    512016 PROXY STATEMENT


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Ms.

Mses. Gardner and Romans and Messrs. KempStrange (Chair), Nance Newman and Stoneburner,Plank, all of whom are independent non-management directors, currently serve on the Compensation & Management Development Committee. None of these individuals is or has been an officer of the Company, was an employee of the Company during the last fiscal year or as of the date of this Proxy Statement or is serving or has served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity that has an executive officer serving on the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company served as a director or on the compensation committee of another entity that had an executive officer serving as a director or on the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Company.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The table below provides information relating to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014.2015. All of our equity compensation plans have been approved by our stockholders.

Plan Category
 Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(1) (#)		 Weighted-Average Exercise
Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (2) ($)		 Number of Securities Remaining
Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in First Column)(3) (#)		 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 ​2,968,356 $3.17 ​7,485,218 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  —  —  — 
​​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​ ​

Total (4)

 ​2,968,356 $3.17 ​7,485,218 
​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​
Plan Category 
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(1)  (#)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(2) ($)
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in First
Column)(3) (#)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3,150,704
 $4.19
 2,617,448
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders —
 —
 —
Total 3,150,704
 $4.19
 2,617,448
___________________
(1)Of the 3,150,704 shares shown in the table above as securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights, 300,540 were subject to outstanding stock option awards and 2,850,164 were subject to outstanding restricted stock unit awards as of December 31, 2014.
(2)The $4.19 weighted-average exercise price shown in the table above includes awards of restricted stock units that do not have an exercise price. Without those awards, the weighted-average exercise price per share would be $43.93. As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average remaining term of outstanding options was 2.21 years.
(3)Of the 2,617,448 shares remaining available for issuance as of December 31, 2014 reflected in the table above: 355,906 of those shares are available under our existing employee stock purchase plan (approximately 101,374 of which are estimated to be issued in the current purchase period); and the remaining 2,261,542 shares are available under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan.
(1)
Of the 2,968,356 shares shown in the table above as securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights, 194,440 were subject to outstanding stock option awards and 2,773,916 were subject to outstanding RSU awards as of December 31, 2015.

(2)
The $3.17 weighted-average exercise price shown in the table above includes RSU awards that do not have an exercise price. Without those awards, the weighted-average exercise price per share would be $48.45. As of December 31, 2015, the weighted average remaining term of outstanding options was 2.11 years.

(3)
Of the 7,485,218 shares remaining available for issuance as of December 31, 2015 reflected in the table above: 219,771 of those shares are available under our existing employee stock purchase plan (approximately 65,814 of which are estimated to be issued in the current purchase period); and the remaining 7,265,447 shares are available under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan. Under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, the number of shares available for issuance is reduced by 1.87 times the number of shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock unitRSU awards, and is reduced by 1 times the number of shares subject to option awards. The 2,261,5427,265,447 shares available for grant under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan assumes that all future awards under the plan will be stock options. Only 1,209,3813,885,266 shares would be available for grant under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan if all future awards under the plan are restricted stock or restricted stock units.RSU awards. Thus far, all awards under the 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan have been restricted stock unitRSU awards.

(4)
Does not include any equity-based compensation awards that are solely settled in cash.


​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    522016 PROXY STATEMENT        65

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Audit Committee of our Board has appointed the independent registered public accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016. PricewaterhouseCoopers has served as our independent auditor since 1999. We are not required under SEC regulations to submit this proposal, however, the Board believes it is appropriate and a good corporate governance practice to do so. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be offered the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent auditor for fiscal year 2016.

​

66        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION


The Compensation Discussion and Analysis begins on page 26, of this Proxy Statement, which is followed by the executive compensation tables. As discussed there, the Board of Directors believeswe believe that the Company’sCompany's long-term success depends in large measure on the talents of our employees. The Company’sOur compensation system plays a significant role in our ability to attract, retain, and motivate the highest quality employees. The Board believesWe further believe that itsour current compensation program directly links executive compensation to performance, aligning the interests of our executive officers withand those of our stockholders.

In addition, we believe sound corporate governance principles and effective compensation programs are interrelated. Our core executive compensation practices are summarized below:


What We Do
What We Don't Do
​

✓

We structure our NEOs' compensation so that approximately 84% of total direct compensation is at-risk

​

✗

We do not have employment agreements with any of our executive officers

​

✓

We tie our annual incentive awards to a range of objective and strategic measurements, including safety, environmental, regulatory and compliance

✗

We do not provide for excise tax gross ups in connection with a change of control in any executive officer agreements entered into after January 2009, and it is our policy not to include any such tax gross up in any future executive officer agreements

​

✓

We emphasize long-term performance in our equity-based incentive awards

​

✗

We prohibit executive officers from buying, selling or writing puts, calls or options related to Company stock

​

✓

Our change of control severance agreements are "double-trigger," requiring both a change of control and a loss of position before any cash payments are awarded

✗

We prohibit executives from holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock as collateral

​

✓

We mandate stock ownership requirements for our officers

​

✗

We do not allow repricing of stock options without stockholder approval

​

✓

Our Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors and engages an independent compensation consultant

✗

We do not grant excessive perquisites, and all perquisites have a specific business rationale

​

✓

We hold an annual say-on-pay advisory vote

​​​

✓

We consider tax deductibility when structuring compensation awards

​

✓

We may seek to recover equity and cash incentive awards inappropriately received by an executive officer

​​​

This proposal provides stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation program.

The Board invites you to review carefully the “Executive Compensation”"Executive Compensation" section, which includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 26 and asks that you cast ayour vote either to endorse or not endorse the Company’sCompany's executive compensation programs through the following resolution:

“

    "RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Newfield’sNewfield's named executive officers, as disclosed in the 20152016 Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

"

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        67

Table of Contents

The above “say-on-pay”"say-on-pay" vote is being provided pursuant to SEC regulations. While the vote does not bind the Board to any particular action, the Board values the input of the stockholders, and will take into account the outcome of this vote in considering future compensation arrangements. We include this stockholder advisory vote annually and the next such vote will occur at the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board Recommendation
BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR”"FOR" approval of the following resolution: “RESOLVED,"RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Newfield’sNewfield's named executive officers, as disclosed in the 20152016 Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
"

​

68        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    2011 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN

(increasing authorized shares under plan)
The Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan (Original 2011 Stock Plan), was approved by stockholders at our 2011 Annual Meeting held on May 5, 2011. The First Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan was approved by stockholders at our 2013 Annual Meeting held on May 2, 2013 (First Amended 2011 Stock Plan). Newfield now seeks stockholder approval for the Second Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan (Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan) that increases the number|    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan by 7,000,000 shares. Our Board approved this Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan on February 5, 2015, subject to stockholder approval at our Annual Meeting. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this proposal have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, which is attached hereto as Appendix B.

Contents

Background and Purpose

Our Board recommends approval of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. The proposed increase in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan would enable the continued use of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan for stock-based grants consistent with the objectives of our compensation program in order to:
promote the long-term success of the Company;
continue to attract and retain high quality talent;
motivate key employees by instilling a sense of business ownership in the Company;
provide incentive compensation opportunities that are competitive with those of our compensation peer group; and
further align the interest of our stockholders, executive officers and employees.
The use of stock-based grants under our Original and First Amended 2011 Stock Plans continues to be an important part of our compensation program. The following table provides information relating to our equity compensation plans as of our record date,

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 53

March 16, 2015. In addition, as of our record date, there were 162,697,001 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding (excluding 304,913 shares held in treasury). All of our equity compensation plans have been approved by our stockholders.
Plan Category 
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(1)  (#)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights(2) ($)
 
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in First
Column)(3) (#)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3,449,955
 $3.18
 1,753,432
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders —
 —
 —
Total 3,449,955
 $3.18
 1,753,432
___________________
(1)Of the 3,449,955 shares shown in the table above as securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights, 231,440 were subject to outstanding stock option awards and 3,218,815 were subject to outstanding restricted stock unit awards as of March 16, 2015.
(2)The $3.18 weighted-average exercise price shown in the table above includes awards of restricted stock units that do not have an exercise price. Without those awards, the weighted-average exercise price per share would be $47.41. As of March 16, 2015, the weighted average remaining term of outstanding options was 2.63 years.
(3)Of the 1,753,432 shares remaining available for issuance as of March 16, 2015 reflected in the table above: 355,906 of those shares are under our existing employee stock purchase plan (approximately 101,374 of which are estimated to be issued in the current purchase period); and the remaining 1,397,526 shares are under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan.
Under our First Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the number of shares available for issuance is reduced by 1.87 times the number of shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, and is reduced by 1 times the number of shares subject to option awards. The 1,397,526 shares available for grant under our First Amended 2011 Stock Plan assumes that all future awards under the plan will be stock options. Only 747,340 shares would be available for grant under our First Amended 2011 Stock Plan if all future awards under the plan are restricted stock or restricted stock units. Thus far, all awards under the First Amended 2011 Stock Plan have been restricted stock unit awards.
Based upon our current stock price and our desire to continue to have our executives and employees aligned with stockholders interests, we do not believe that the remaining 1,397,526 shares provide sufficient available shares for the next year of grants under the First Amended 2011 Stock Plan. The Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan would increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the First Amended 2011 Stock Plan by 7,000,000, resulting in a total of 17,900,000 shares authorized and 8,397,526 shares available for issuance under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. This increase would give us the flexibility to continue to make stock-based grants over the next three years in amounts determined appropriate by our Compensation Committee.
The proposed Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will not be implemented unless approved by our stockholders. If the proposed Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan is not approved by our stockholders, the First Amended 2011 Stock Plan will remain in effect in its present form.
The following is a summary of the principal features of our Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, which is identical to both the Original and First Amended 2011 Stock Plans other than the number of authorized shares. The summary does not purport to be a complete description of all provisions of our Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the text of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.
Purpose
The purpose of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan is to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the Company by providing certain directors, officers, and employees of the Company and its affiliates with incentives to maximize stockholder value and to otherwise contribute to the success of the Company, thereby aligning the interests of such service providers with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. Grants of incentive stock options (Incentive Stock Options) intended to satisfy the requirements of section 422 of the Code, nonqualified stock options which are not intended to satisfy the requirements of section 422 of the Code (Nonqualified Stock Options), restricted stock awards (Restricted Stock Awards), restricted stock units (RSUs), performance stock awards and performance unit awards, or any combination of the foregoing (collectively referred to as Awards) may be made under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 54

Term
The Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will become effective on the date the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company (Effective Date). The Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall continue indefinitely until it is terminated as provided in the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. No Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the Original 2011 Stock Plan. The applicable provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will continue in effect with respect to an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan for as long as such Award remains outstanding.
Administration
The Committee administers the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. The Committee is (i) in the case of an Award granted to a non-employee director, the Board and (ii) in the case of any other Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, a committee of at least two persons, who are members of the Compensation Committee of the Board and are appointed by the Compensation Committee of the Board, or, to the extent it chooses to operate as the Committee, the Compensation Committee of the Board. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company is authorized to grant Awards (other than certain performance awards) as inducements to hire prospective employees who will not be officers of the Company or any affiliate and subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), but such awards shall not exceed an amount of shares of common stock of the Company (Common Stock) to be determined by a resolution of the Committee. On an annual basis, the Committee also may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company the ability to grant Awards (other than certain performance awards that are intended to be exempt from the deduction limitation of section 162(m) of the Code) to eligible persons who are not officers or non-employee directors of the Company subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
In administering the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the Committee shall have the full power to:
determine the persons to whom and the time(s) at which Awards will be made;
determine the number and exercise price of shares of Common Stock covered in each Award, subject to the terms and provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan;
determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each Award;
accelerate the time at which any outstanding Award will vest;
prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to administration of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan; and
make all other determinations and take all other actions deemed necessary, appropriate or advisable for the proper administration of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.
All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders, employees and other holders of Awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and the estates and beneficiaries of such employees and other holders of Awards.
Unless otherwise limited by the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or the Code, the Committee has broad discretion to administer the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.
Shares Available for the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
There are 10,900,000 shares of Common Stock currently reserved for issuance under the Amended 2011 Stock Plan. This proposal requests an additional 7,000,000 shares to be authorized and reserved for issuance under the plan. Shares of Common Stock that are issued under a full value award (i.e., Awards of stock under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan which are not Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options (collectively, “Options”)) shall be counted against the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan share limit as 1.87 shares of Common Stock for every one share so issued. Shares of Common Stock that are issued under Options shall be counted against the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan Share Limit as one share for every one share so issued.
If an Option granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan is forfeited, expires or otherwise terminates without being exercised, or is settled in cash in lieu of shares of Common Stock, then shares of Common Stock not acquired or issued pursuant to such Award again become available for issuance under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. To the extent that a full value award is forfeited, lapses, expires, or is settled in cash in lieu of shares of Common Stock, 1.87 multiplied by the number of shares that were subject to such portion of the full value award shall again become available for issuance under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 55

If shares of Common Stock are withheld from payment of an Award to satisfy tax obligations with respect to the Award, such shares of Common Stock will count against the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. If shares of the Common Stock are tendered in payment of the exercise price of an Option, such shares will not increase the Plan share limit.
The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Plan is 2,500,000.
The maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Options may be granted to an employee of the Company during a fiscal year of the Company is 500,000. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to each of performance stock awards and performance unit awards paid in shares of Common Stock which may be granted to an employee of the Company during a fiscal year of the Company is 250,000. The maximum grant date value of cash with respect to which performance unit awards payable in cash may be granted to an employee during a fiscal year of the Company, determined as of the dates of grants of the performance unit awards, is the then equivalent of 250,000 shares of Common Stock.
The Committee shall not award to employees of the Company more than 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan pursuant to Awards with a vesting schedule that provides for full vesting in less than (a) three years in the case of Awards that are not intended to constitute “performance-based” compensation for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code or (ii) one year after the date of grant in the case of Awards that are intended to constitute “performance-based” compensation under section 162(m) of the Code; provided, however, that Awards may vest earlier, as the Committee deems appropriate, upon death, disability, retirement or an event that constitutes a Change of Control.
Any shares of our Common Stock delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.
Participation
Participation is limited to employees of the Company and its affiliates and non-employee directors selected by the Committee (Eligible Person). An Eligible Person under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan is eligible to receive an Award pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and subject to any limitations imposed by appropriate action of the Committee.
Fair Market Value
Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the fair market value of the Common Stock as of any particular date means, if the Common Stock is traded on a stock exchange, the mean of the high and low sales price of the Common Stock as reported on the principal securities exchange on which the Stock is traded. If, in the discretion of the Committee, another means of determining the fair market value of a share of Common Stock shall be necessary or advisable, the Committee may provide for another method or means for determining such fair market value, which method or means shall comply with the requirements of a reasonable valuation method as described under section 409A of the Code.
Awards
Stock Options. The Committee may grant Options to purchase shares of Common Stock to qualifying Eligible Persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee may determine, subject to the terms and provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, including (i) Incentive Stock Options (only to key employees of the Company or its subsidiaries) and (ii) Nonqualified Stock Options. Options may be exercised as the Committee determines, but not later than ten years from the date of grant or, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an employee who at the time of the grant owns more than 10 percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, if required by the Code, not later than five years from the date it is granted. The exercise price of each Option granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will be stated in the Option agreement and may vary; however, the exercise price of an Option may not be less than 100 percent (100%) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, and in the case of the grant of an Incentive Stock Option to an employee who, at the time of the grant, owns more than 10 percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, the exercise price may not be less than 110 percent (110%) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as of the date of grant of the option.
To the extent that the aggregate fair market value of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options first become exercisable by a holder of such Award in any calendar year exceeds $100,000, taking into account both shares of the Common Stock subject to Incentive Stock Options under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and the Common Stock subject to Incentive Stock Options under all other plans of the Company, such options shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options. In reducing the number of Options treated as Incentive Stock Options to meet the $100,000 limit, the most recently granted options shall be reduced first. To the extent a reduction of simultaneously granted Options is necessary to meet the $100,000 limit, the Committee may designate which shares of the Common Stock are to be treated as shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 56

Options may be exercised, in whole or in part, upon payment of the exercise price of the shares to be acquired. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, payment for the exercise price of an Option must be made in cash, a cashless exercise through a registered broker-dealer (if approved in advance by the Committee or an executive officer of the Company) or any other form of payment acceptable to the Committee.
The Committee shall specify in the option agreement the time and manner in which each Option may be exercised.
An optionee shall not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to the Common Stock covered by an Option until the date a stock certificate for such Common Stock is issued by the Company.
Restricted Stock. Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the Committee may award restricted stock to Eligible Persons in such numbers and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting and the transferability restrictions applicable to any award of restricted stock will be determined by the Committee.
A Restricted Stock Award is a grant of shares of Common Stock subject to risk of forfeiture, restrictions on transferability and any other restrictions imposed by the Committee at its discretion. Each Restricted Stock Award grant will specify the applicable restrictions and the duration of such restrictions, and when such restrictions will lapse. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, certificates representing shares granted pursuant to Restricted Stock Awards will be held in custody by the Company during the applicable restriction period and will bear an appropriate legend specifying the restrictions. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee during such period of restriction, the holder of a Restricted Stock Award will have all of the rights of a stockholder, including but not limited to the rights to receive dividends and to vote.
Dividends paid with respect to restricted stock in cash or property other than shares of Common Stock or rights to acquire shares of Common Stock shall be paid to the recipient of the Restricted Stock Award currently. Dividends paid in shares of Common Stock or rights to acquire shares of Common Stock shall be added to and become a part of the Restricted Stock Award.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan authorizes the Committee to grant RSUs to Eligible Persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting and the transferability restrictions applicable to any RSU award shall be determined by the Committee. The Committee shall maintain a bookkeeping ledger account that reflects the number of RSUs credited under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan for the benefit of each holder of a RSU award.
A RSU is similar in nature to a Restricted Stock Award in that the value of the award is determined based upon a share of the Common Stock. However, no shares of the Common Stock are actually transferred to the holder of such award at the time of grant. If the award is settled in shares of the Common Stock, then such shares will not be issued until a later date specified in the applicable award agreement. Each RSU shall have a value equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock.
Payment under a RSU award shall be made in either cash or shares of Common Stock as specified in the applicable award agreement. Payment under a RSU award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable award agreement. The award agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half months after the end of the fiscal year in which the RSU award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (as defined in section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury regulations issued thereunder) or (b) at a time that is permissible under section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury rules and regulations issued thereunder.
A recipient of a RSU shall have no rights of a stockholder with respect to such RSU, including no voting rights. An award agreement for a RSU award shall not specify that the holder shall be entitled to the payment of dividend equivalents under the award.
Performance Awards. Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the Committee may grant performance stock and performance unit awards to Eligible Persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.
The amount of, the vesting and the transferability restrictions applicable to any performance stock or performance unit award shall be based upon the attainment of such performance goals set forth in the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan as the Committee may determine. With respect to an employee of the Company or an affiliate who is a “covered employee” (under section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service (Covered Employee)), a performance goal for a particular performance stock or performance unit award must be established by the Compensation & Management Development Committee prior to the earlier to occur of (a) 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to which the performance goal relates or (b) the lapse of 25 percent of the period of service, and in any event while the outcome is substantially uncertain. A performance goal must be objective such that a third party having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether the goal is met and may be based on one or more of the following business criteria that apply to the employee, one or more business units of the Company or the Company as a whole: earnings per share, earnings per share growth, total stockholder return, economic value added, cash return on capitalization, increased revenue, revenue ratios (per employee or per customer), net income (before or after taxes), stock price, market share, return on equity, return on assets, return on capital, return on capital compared to cost of capital, return on capital employed, return on invested capital, return on investment, return on sales, operating or profit margins, stockholder value, net cash flow, operating income, earnings before or after interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, cash flow, cash flow

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 57

from operations, cost reductions or cost savings, cost ratios (per employee or per customer), expense control, sales, proceeds from dispositions, project completion time, budget goals, net cash flow before financing activities, customer growth, total capitalization, debt to total capitalization ratio, credit quality or debt ratings, dividend payout, dividend growth, reserve additions or revisions, economic value added from reserves, reserve replacement ratios, reserve replacement costs, finding and development costs, exploration successes, operational downtime, rig utilization, amount of oil and gas reserves, production volumes or safety results. Goals may also be based on performance relative to a peer group of companies. Unless otherwise stated, such a performance goal need not be based upon an increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria). Prior to the payment of any compensation based on the achievement of performance goals, the Compensation & Management Development Committee must certify in writing that applicable performance goals and any of the material terms thereof were, in fact, satisfied.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, each holder of a performance stock award shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Common Stock issued to such holder pursuant to the award during any period in which such issued shares of Common Stock are subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer, including the right to vote such shares of stock. An award agreement for a performance unit award shall not specify that the holder of such award shall be entitled to the payment of dividend equivalents under the award.
Payment under a performance unit award shall be made in cash and/or shares of Common Stock, and shall be paid at such time, as is specified in the applicable award agreement. The award agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half months after the end of the fiscal year in which the performance unit award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (as defined in section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury rules and regulations issued thereunder) or (b) at a time that is permissible under section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury rules and regulations issued thereunder.
It is intended that the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will conform with the standards of section 162(m) of the Code and Department of Treasury Regulation section 1.162-27(e)(2)(i). Neither the Compensation & Management Development Committee nor the Board may increase the amount of compensation payable under a performance stock award or performance unit award. If the time at which any performance stock award or performance unit award will vest is accelerated, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to, or the amount payable under, such award shall be reduced pursuant to Department of Treasury Regulation section 1.162-27(e)(2)(iii) to reasonably reflect the time value of money.
No payments of Common Stock or cash will be made to a Covered Employee pursuant to a performance stock award or performance unit award unless the stockholder approval requirements of Department of Treasury Regulation section 1.162-27(e)(4) are satisfied.
Substitution Awards
Awards may be granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan in substitution for stock options and other Awards held by employees and directors of other corporations who are about to become employees or affiliates of the Company or any of its subsidiaries as a result of a merger or consolidation of the employing corporation with the Company, or the acquisition by the Company of substantially all of the assets of another corporation or the acquisition by the Company of at least 50 percent (50%) of the issued and outstanding stock of another corporation as the result of which it becomes an affiliate of the Company. The terms and conditions of the substitute awards granted may vary from the terms and conditions set out in the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan to the extent the Board, at the time of grant, may deem appropriate to conform, in whole or in part, to the provisions of the options and other awards in substitution for which they are granted.
Forfeiture
If the Committee finds by a majority vote that a holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, before or after termination of his employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries or severance of his affiliation with the Company and all its affiliates (a) committed fraud, embezzlement, theft, felony or an act of dishonesty in the course of his employment by or affiliation with the Company or an affiliate which conduct damaged the Company or an affiliate; (b) disclosed trade secrets of the Company or an affiliate; or (c) violated the terms of any non-competition, non-disclosure or similar agreement with respect to the Company or any affiliate to which the holder of such award is a party, then, as of the date the Committee makes its finding, some or all Awards awarded to such holder (including vested Awards that have been exercised, vested Awards that have not been exercised and Awards that have not yet vested), as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and all net proceeds realized with respect to any such Awards, will be forfeited to the Company on such terms as determined by the Committee. The findings and decision of the Committee with respect to the matter shall be final for all purposes.
The Committee may specify in an award agreement that the rights, payments, and benefits of a holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan with respect to such Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 58

Award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, termination of employment for cause, termination of such holder's provision of services to the Company or its subsidiaries, violation of material policies of the Company or its subsidiaries, breach of non-competition, confidentiality, or other restrictive covenants that may apply to such holder, or other conduct by such holder that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company or its subsidiaries.
Recoupment in Restatement Situations
Without limiting any other provision of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws, a current or former recipient of Awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan who was a current or former executive officer of the Company shall forfeit and must repay to the Company any compensation awarded under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan to the extent specified in any of the Company’s recoupment policies established or amended (now or in the future) in compliance with the rules and standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission Committee under or in connection with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Requirements of Law
The Company shall not be required to sell or issue any shares of Common Stock under any Award if issuing those shares of Common Stock would constitute or result in a violation by the holder of an Award or the Company of any provision of any law, statute or regulation of any governmental authority. Specifically, in connection with any applicable statute or regulation relating to the registration of securities, upon exercise of any option or pursuant to any other Award, the Company shall not be required to issue any shares of Common Stock unless the Committee has received evidence satisfactory to it to the effect that the holder of the Award will not transfer the shares of Common Stock except in accordance with applicable law, including receipt of an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company to the effect that any proposed transfer complies with applicable law. The Company may, but shall in no event be obligated to, register any shares of Common Stock covered by the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan pursuant to applicable securities laws of any country or any political subdivision. The Company shall not be obligated to take any other affirmative action in order to cause or enable the exercise of an option or any other Award, or the issuance of shares of Common Stock pursuant thereto, to comply with any law or regulation of any governmental authority.
Change in Capital Structure
The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the Company’s capital structure or its business, any merger or consolidation of the Company, any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference shares ahead of or affecting the Common Stock or stock rights, the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business or any other corporate act or proceeding, whether of a similar character or otherwise. The issuance by the Company of stock of any class or series, or securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, stock of any class or series, for cash or property, or for labor or services either upon direct sale or upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe for them, or upon conversion or exchange of stock or obligations of the Company convertible into, or exchangeable for, stock or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason of such issuance shall be made with respect to, the number, class or series, or price of shares of the Common Stock then subject to outstanding options or other Awards.
If the Company shall effect a capital readjustment or other increase or reduction of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, without receiving compensation therefore in money, services or property, then (1) the number, class or series and per share price of Common Stock subject to outstanding Awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be appropriately adjusted (subject to the restriction discussed below under the heading “Award Agreements” regarding repricing) as to entitle a holder of an Award under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan to receive upon exercise, for the same aggregate cash consideration, the equivalent total number and class or series of the Common Stock the holder would have received had the holder of such Award exercised such award in full immediately prior to the event requiring the adjustment; and (2) the number and class or series of the Common Stock then reserved to be issued under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be adjusted.
If while unexercised Awards remain outstanding under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan (1) the Company shall not be the surviving entity in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization (or survives only as a subsidiary of an entity other than an entity that was wholly-owned by the Company immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or other reorganization); (2) the Company sells, leases or exchanges or agrees to sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its assets to any other person or entity (other than an entity wholly-owned by the Company); (3) the Company is to be dissolved; or (4) the Company is a party to any other corporate transaction (as defined under section 424(a) of the Code and applicable Department of Treasury regulations) that is not described in clauses (1), (2) or (3) of this sentence (each such event is referred to herein as a Corporate Change), then, except as otherwise provided in an award agreement or other agreement between the holder of the Award and the Company (provided that such exceptions shall not apply in the case of a reincorporation merger), or as a result of the Committee's effectuation of one or more of the alternatives described below, there shall be no acceleration of the time at which any Award then outstanding may be exercised, and no

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 59

later than ten days after the approval by the stockholders of the Company of such Corporate Change, the Committee, acting in its sole and absolute discretion, shall act to effect one or more of the following alternatives, which may vary among individual holders of Awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan:
1.accelerate the time at which some or all of the Awards then outstanding may be exercised, after which all such Awards that remain unexercised and all rights of holders of Awards thereunder shall terminate;
2.require the mandatory surrender to the Company by all or selected holders of Awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan of some or all of the then outstanding Awards held by such holders as of a date, before or after such Corporate Change, in which event the Committee shall thereupon cancel such Award and the Company shall pay to each such holder an amount of cash per share equal to the excess, if any, of the per share price offered to stockholders of the Company in connection with such Corporate Change over the exercise prices under such Award for such shares;
3.with respect to all or selected holders of Awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, have some or all of their then outstanding Awards assumed or have a new Award of a similar nature substituted for some or all of their then outstanding Awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan by an entity which is a party to the transaction resulting in such Corporate Change and which is then employing such holder or which is affiliated or associated with such holder in the same or a substantially similar manner as the Company prior to the Corporate Change, or a parent or subsidiary of such entity, provided that (A) such assumption or substitution is on a basis where the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the Common Stock subject to the Award immediately after the assumption or substitution over the aggregate exercise price of such Common Stock is equal to the excess of the aggregate fair market value of all Common Stock subject to the Award immediately before such assumption or substitution over the aggregate exercise price of such Common Stock, and (B) the assumed rights or the substituted rights will have the same terms and conditions as the rights under the existing Award assumed or substituted for;
4.provide that the number and class or series of Common Stock covered by an Award shall be adjusted so that such Award when exercised shall thereafter cover the number and class or series of Common Stock or other securities or property (including, without limitation, cash) to which the holder of such Award would have been entitled pursuant to the terms of the agreement or plan relating to such Corporate Change if, immediately prior to such Corporate Change, the holder of such Award had been the holder of record of the number of shares of Common Stock then covered by such Award; or
5.make such adjustments to Awards then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate to reflect such Corporate Change.
If the Committee chooses to effect one or more of the alternatives set out in paragraphs (3), (4) or (5) above, it may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without the consent or approval of any holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, accelerate the time at which some or all Awards then outstanding may be exercised. With respect to a reincorporation merger in which holders of the Company's ordinary shares will receive one ordinary share of the successor corporation for each ordinary share of the Company, none of the alternatives set forth above shall apply and, without Committee action, each Award shall automatically convert into a similar award of the successor corporation exercisable for the same number of ordinary shares of the successor as the award was exercisable for ordinary shares of stock of the Company.
In the event of changes in the outstanding Common Stock by reason of recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, combinations, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization occurring after the date of the grant of any Award and not otherwise provided for above, any outstanding Award and any award agreements evidencing such Award shall be subject to adjustment by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion as to the number and price of the Common Stock or other consideration subject to such Award. In the event of any such change in the outstanding Common Stock, the aggregate number of shares of the Common Stock available under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan may be appropriately adjusted by the Committee.
After a merger of one or more corporations into the Company or after a consolidation of the Company and one or more corporations in which the Company shall be the surviving corporation, each holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be entitled to have his restricted stock appropriately adjusted based on the manner in which the shares of Common Stock were adjusted under the terms of the agreement of merger or consolidation.
Award Agreements
Each Award shall be embodied in a written award agreement that shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. The award agreement may specify the effect of a change in control of the Company on the Award. The award agreement may contain any other provisions that the Committee in its discretion shall deem advisable which are not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. The terms of any outstanding Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan may be amended from time to time by the Committee in its discretion in any manner that it deems appropriate and that is consistent with the terms of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. However, no such amendment shall adversely affect in a material manner any right of a holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 60

without his or her written consent. Except as described above in the second paragraph under “Change in Capital Structure”, the Committee may not directly or indirectly lower the exercise price of a previously granted Option.
Restrictions on Stock Received
The Committee may impose such conditions and/or restrictions on any shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to an Award as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan hold the shares of Common Stock for a specified period of time.
Change of Control; Termination
Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, in the event of an occurrence of a Change of Control of the Company (except to the extent expressly provided otherwise in the applicable award agreement) all then outstanding Options, Restricted Stock Awards and performance stock awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall become fully vested, and exercisable and all substantial risk of forfeiture restrictions applicable thereto shall lapse. The effect, if any, of a Change of Control of the Company upon any other Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement issued by the Committee that are applicable to the Award.
For purposes of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, a “Change of Control” means the occurrence of one of the following events:
1.the Company is not the surviving person in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization (or survives only as a subsidiary of another person);
2.the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with another person and as a result of such merger or consolidation less than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting corporation will be issued in respect of the capital stock of the Company;
3.the Company sells, leases or exchanges all or substantially all of its assets to any other person;
4.the Company is to be dissolved and liquidated;
5.any person, including a “group” as contemplated by Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires or gains ownership or control (including the power to vote) of more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s voting stock (based upon voting power); or
6.individuals who are Incumbent Directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board.
For purposes of the definition of a “Change of Control”, the term “Incumbent Directors” means (A) a member of the Board on the effective date of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan; or (B) an individual: (i) who becomes a member of the Board after the effective date of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, (ii) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders is approved or recommended by a vote of at least two thirds of the then surviving Incumbent Directors, and (iii) whose initial assumption of service on the Board is not in connection with an actual or threatened election contest.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (A) a “Change of Control” shall not include clause (1) above or any merger, consolidation, reorganization, sale, lease, exchange, or similar transaction involving solely the Company and one or more persons that were wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company immediately prior to such event; and (B) with respect to RSU Awards, performance stock unit awards and any Award that is intended to comply with (rather than be exempt from) the requirements of section 409A, an event listed above shall not constitute a “Change of Control” unless the event is a “change in control event” within the meaning of Department of Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-3(i)(5).
Tax Withholding
The Company or any subsidiary shall be entitled to deduct from other compensation payable to each Award holder any sums required by federal, state, local or foreign tax law to be withheld with respect to the vesting or exercise of an Award or lapse of restrictions on an Award. In the alternative, the Company may require the Award holder (or other person validly exercising the Award) to pay such sums for taxes directly to the Company or any subsidiary in cash or by check. In the discretion of the Committee, the Company may reduce the number of shares of Common Stock issued to the Award holder upon such holder’s exercise of an Award or the vesting of an Award to satisfy the tax withholding obligations of the Company or a subsidiary.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 61

Non-Transferability
Except as specified in the applicable award agreement or in a domestic relations court order, an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall not be transferable by the holder thereof (whether for consideration or otherwise) other than by will or under the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable, during such holder's lifetime, only by him or her. Any attempted assignment of an Award in violation of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be null and void. In the discretion of the Committee, any attempt to transfer an Award other than under the terms of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and the applicable award agreement may terminate the Award. No Incentive Stock Option granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, all Incentive Stock Options granted to an employee under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be exercisable during such employee’s lifetime only by the employee and, after that time, by the employee’s heirs and estate.
Termination and Modification of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
The Board, without approval of the stockholders, may modify or terminate the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan at any time. The Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate any award agreement in whole or in part. However, no termination, amendment, suspension, or modification of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan or an award agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, without the written consent of the holder holding such Award. The Committee shall not directly or indirectly lower the option price of a previously granted Option without prior approval of the Company’s stockholders and no amendment of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by applicable law or stock exchange rules. Accordingly, except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or to cancel Options in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options without stockholder approval.
Compliance with Section 409A
Awards shall be designed, granted and administered in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury Regulations issued thereunder. The Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and each award agreement under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan that is intended to comply with the requirements of section 409A shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. If the Committee determines that an Award, award agreement, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction or any other action or arrangement contemplated by the provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan would, if undertaken, cause a holder of an Award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan to become subject to additional taxes under section 409A of the Code, then unless the Committee specifically provides otherwise, such Award, award agreement, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction or other action or arrangement shall not be given effect to the extent it causes such result and the related provisions of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and/or the award agreement will be deemed modified, or, if necessary, suspended in order to comply with the requirements of section 409A of the Code to the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, in each case without the consent of or notice to the holder of an Award. The exercisability of an Option shall not be extended to the extent that such extension would subject the holder of an Award to additional taxes under section 409A of the Code.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards Granted Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
The following is a general description of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences generally applicable to participants who are either U.S. citizens or residents and to the Company of certain transactions with respect to Awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.
Incentive Stock Options
When the Committee grants an employee an Incentive Stock Option to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the employee will not be required to recognize any U.S. federal taxable income as a result of the grant or as a result of the employee's exercise of the Incentive Stock Option; however, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the time of exercise is an item of tax preference that may require payment of an alternative minimum tax. On the sale of the shares acquired through exercise of an Incentive Stock Option (assuming such sale does not occur within two years of the date of grant of the option or within one year from the date of exercise), any gain (or loss) will be taxed as long term capital gain (or loss) and the Company will not be entitled to any deduction in connection with the sale (or the grant or exercise) of the Incentive Stock Option. With respect to a sale of shares that occurs after the later of two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise, the tax basis of the shares for the purpose of a subsequent sale includes the option price paid for the shares.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 62

However, if the employee sells the shares acquired upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option before the later of (i) two years from the date of grant and (ii) one year from the date of exercise, the employee will be treated as having received, at the time of sale, compensation taxable as ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The amount treated as compensation income is the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price, and any amount realized in excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise would be treated as long or short term capital gain, depending on how long such shares were held. With respect to a sale of shares that occurs before the later of two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise, the tax basis of the shares for the purpose of a subsequent sale includes the option price paid for the shares and the compensation income reported at the time of sale of the shares.
Nonqualified Stock Options
When the Committee grants a Nonqualified Stock Option to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the recipient will not be required to recognize any U.S. federal taxable income as a result of the grant. However, the recipient will be required to recognize ordinary income on the date the recipient exercises the Nonqualified Stock Option. Generally, the measure of the income will be equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock acquired on the date the shares are acquired and the option price. The tax basis of the shares acquired on exercise of the Nonqualified Stock Option for the purpose of a subsequent sale includes the option price paid and the ordinary income reported on exercise of the Nonqualified Stock Option. The income reportable on exercise of the Nonqualified Stock Option by an employee is subject to federal tax withholding. Also, the Company will generally be entitled to a deduction in the amount reportable as income by the recipient on the exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option. Generally, the Company will be entitled to a deduction in the amount reportable as income by the recipient on the exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option.
Restricted Stock Awards
The grant of a Restricted Stock Award under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan generally will not result in the recognition of any U.S. federal taxable income by the recipient or a deduction for the Company, at the time of grant unless the recipient timely makes an election under section 83(b) of the Code. Upon the expiration of the forfeiture restrictions applicable to the Restricted Stock Award (i.e., as the shares become vested), the recipient will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of those shares at that time over the amount (if any) the recipient paid for the shares. The income realized by an employee is subject to federal tax withholding. The Company will be entitled to a deduction in the amount and at the time the recipient recognizes income. If an election under section 83(b) of the Code has not been made, any dividends received with respect to any Restricted Stock Award that are not vested (i.e., the forfeiture restrictions have not yet lapsed) generally will be treated as compensation that is taxable as ordinary income to the recipient and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. With respect to any Restricted Stock Award that is vested (i.e., the forfeiture restrictions have lapsed), the recipient will be taxed on any dividends on such shares as the dividends are paid to the recipient and the Company will not be entitled to deductions with respect to the dividends.
If the recipient of the Restricted Stock Award makes an election under section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the date of transfer of the restricted shares awarded under the Restricted Stock Award, the recipient will recognize ordinary income on the date the shares are awarded. The amount of ordinary income required to be recognized is an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on the date of award over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. In such case, the recipient will not be required to recognize additional ordinary income when the shares vest. However, if the shares are later forfeited, a loss can only be recognized up to the amount the individual paid, if any, for the shares of Common Stock.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The grant of a RSU award under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan generally will not result in the recognition of any U.S. federal taxable income by the recipient or a deduction for the Company at the time of grant. At the time a RSU award vests the recipient will recognize ordinary income and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Generally, the measure of the income and deduction will be the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time the RSU is settled over the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time the RSU was granted.
Performance Stock and Performance Unit Awards
Performance stock awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan generally have the same tax consequences as Restricted Stock Awards as discussed above (except that the compensation deduction limitation described below generally will not apply). A recipient of a performance unit award under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan generally will not realize U.S. federal taxable income at the time of grant of the award, and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction at that time with respect to the award. When the performance goals applicable to the performance unit award are attained and amounts are due under the award, the holder of the award will be treated as receiving compensation taxable as ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 63

Compensation Deduction Limitation
Under section 162(m) of the Code, the Company's federal income tax deductions for certain compensation paid to designated executives is limited to $1 million per year. These executives include the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the next three highest compensated officers other than the Chief Financial Officer. Section 162(m) of the Code provides an exception to this limitation for certain “performance based” compensation approved by a committee consisting solely of at least two “outside directors”. The Company believes that Nonqualified Stock Options to purchase shares of Common Stock, and performance based awards granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan generally should qualify as performance based compensation for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code.
Benefits Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
The Awards, if any, that may be granted in the future to participants under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan are subject to the discretion of the Committee and, therefore, are not determinable at this time.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Second Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan that increases the authorized shares by 7,000,000 shares.

PROPOSALS 5A AND 5B: CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED 2011 STOCK PLAN AND 2011 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN
PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR TAX COMPLIANCE
We are asking stockholders to approve the material terms of the performance goals and metrics that are included in our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended (Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan) and in our 2011 Annual Cash Incentive Plan (2011 Annual Incentive Plan). Proposal 5A requests the approval of the materials terms of the performance goals and metrics for performance awards under our Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan. Proposal 5B requests requests the approval of the material terms of the performance goals and metrics included in our 2011 Annual Incentive Plan. We are submitting these to stockholders as separate proposals so that stockholders are able to express their views on each request separately.
United States tax laws generally do not allow publicly held companies to obtain tax deductions for compensation of more than $1 million paid in any year to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the next three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer) (the "Covered Employees"), unless such payments are “performance-based” as defined in the tax laws. Where the performance criteria provide the Company a choice among different measures, one of the requirements for compensation to be performance-based under those laws is that the Company must at least once every five years obtain stockholder approval of the material terms of the performance metrics for such compensation. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service rules under section 162(m) of the Code, the material terms of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan and 2011 Annual Incentive Plan described below, which stockholders are being asked to approve, constitute the framework within which the Committee would establish the actual performance awards, metrics or goals.
Proposal 5A: Consideration and Approval of Material Terms of the Performance Goals for Performance Awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
A description of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan is set forth above in Proposal 4 of this Proxy Statement. If the stockholders approve the material terms described below, the performance awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will be eligible to meet the section 162(m) requirements for the years 2015 through 2019. To enable the Company to receive tax deductions for compensation awarded under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the Board is requesting stockholder approval of the following material terms of the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan:
Performance Criteria for the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, performance stock awards and performance unit awards are subject to the satisfaction of one or more performance goals. Performance goals for awards will be determined by the Compensation Committee and will be designed to support the business strategy and align executives’ and directors’ interests with stockholder interests. For performance stock awards and performance unit awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under section 162(m) of the Code, performance goals will be based on one or more of the following business criteria that apply to the employee, one or more business units of the Company or the Company as a whole: earnings per share, earnings per share growth, total stockholder

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 64

return, economic value added, cash return on capitalization, increased revenue, revenue ratios (per employee or per customer), net income (before or after taxes), stock price, market share, return on equity, return on assets, return on capital, return on capital compared to cost of capital, return on capital employed, return on invested capital, return on investment, return on sales, operating or profit margins, stockholder value, net cash flow, operating income, earnings before or after interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, cash flow, cash flow from operations, cost reductions or cost savings, cost ratios (per employee or per customer), expense control, sales, proceeds from dispositions, project completion time, budget goals, net cash flow before financing activities, customer growth, total capitalization, debt to total capitalization ratio, credit quality or debt ratings, dividend payout, dividend growth, reserve additions or revisions, economic value added from reserves, reserve replacement ratios, reserve replacement costs, finding and development costs, exploration successes, operational downtime, rig utilization, amount of oil and gas reserves, production volumes or safety results. Goals may also be based on performance relative to a peer group of companies.
Unless otherwise stated, such a performance goal need not be based upon an increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria). Performance goals may be determined by including or excluding, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, items that are determined to be extraordinary, unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence, related to the disposal or acquisition of a segment of a business, or related to a change in accounting principal, in each case, based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 225-20, Income Statement, Extraordinary and Unusual Items, and FASB ASC 830-10, Foreign Currency Matters, Overall, or other applicable accounting rules, or consistent with Company accounting policies and practices in effect on the date the performance goal is established. In interpreting the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan’s provisions applicable to performance goals and performance stock awards or performance unit awards, it is intended that the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will conform with the standards of section 162(m) of the Code and Treasury Regulations § 1.162-27(e)(2)(i), and the Compensation Committee in establishing such goals and interpreting the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be guided by such provisions. Prior to the payment of any compensation based on the achievement of performance goals, the Compensation Committee must certify in writing that applicable performance goals and any of the material terms thereof were, in fact, satisfied. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any performance stock or performance unit awards made pursuant to the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan shall be determined by the Compensation Committee.
Achievement of the goals may be measured:
•individually, alternatively, or in any combination;
•with respect to the Company, one or more business units, or any combination of the foregoing; and
on an absolute basis, or relative to a target, to a designated comparison group, to results in other period, or to other external measures.
Limitations on Awards under Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan
The performance period for any performance stock award or performance unit award granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan will not be less than one year.
Under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted during a fiscal year of the Company in performance stock awards paid in shares of Common Stock to an employee of the Company is 250,000. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted during a fiscal year of the Company in performance unit awards paid in shares of Common Stock to an employee of the Company is 250,000. The maximum grant date value of cash with respect to which performance unit awards payable in cash may be granted to an employee during a fiscal year of the Company, determined as of the dates of grants of the performance unit award, is the equivalent of 250,000 shares of Common Stock.
No performance stock awards or performance unit awards will be granted under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan to a Covered Employee unless the Company’s stockholders approve this Proposal 5A. This proposal was originally approved by our stockholders at the May 2011 Annual Stockholders Meeting.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of material terms of the performance goals for performance awards under the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan.


NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 65

Proposal 5B: Consideration and Approval of Material Terms of the Performance Goals and Metrics under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan
2011 Annual Incentive Plan
The 2011 Annual Incentive Plan is intended to provide an incentive for profitable growth and to motivate the executives toward higher achievement and operating results, to tie their goals and interests to those of the Company and its stockholders and to enable the Company to attract and retain highly qualified executives and key managers. The Compensation Committee's implementation of the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan is also intended to provide incentive compensation based upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals and individual performance in a manner that qualifies for the exception for “performance-based compensation” from the limit on tax deductibility of compensation, as described below.
If the stockholders approve the material terms described below, the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan will be eligible to meet the Section 162(m) requirements for the years 2015 through 2019. To enable the Company to receive tax deductions for compensation awarded under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, the Board is requesting stockholder approval of the following material terms of the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan:
Performance Criteria for the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan
The amount paid under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan for any particular performance period shall be determined in good faith by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis, taking into consideration various factors, including, without limitation:
•earnings per share,
•total stockholder return,
•cash return on capitalization,
•increased revenue,
•revenue ratios,
•net income,
•stock price,
•market share,
•return on equity,
•return on assets,
•return on capital,
•return on capital compared to cost of capital,
•return on capital employed,
•return on invested capital,
•stockholder value,
•net cash flow,
•operating income,
•earnings before interest and taxes,
•cash flow,
•cash flow from operations,
•cost reductions,
•cost ratios,
•profit after tax, and
•performance relative to a peer group,
including such adjustment thereto as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. 
Maximum Bonus
The maximum bonus that may be paid to any of the Covered Officers for any given year is the lesser of (a) 300% of such executive's annual bonus target in effect at the beginning of such year, as approved by the Compensation Committee, or (b) $5,000,000.
Amendments to 2011 Annual Incentive Plan
At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, amendments can be made to the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan that can increase its cost to the Company and can alter the allocation of benefits among participating executive officers.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 66

Estimate of Benefits
Because the grant of awards under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan will be at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, it is not possible to estimate awards that will be made under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan.
Compensation Committee Discretion
The Compensation Committee generally takes reasonable measures to avoid the loss of a Company tax deduction due to section 162(m). However, amendments can be made to the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan that can increase its cost to the Company and can alter the allocation of benefits among participating executive officers. In addition, the Compensation Committee may, in certain circumstances, approve bonus or other payments outside of the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan that do not meet the material terms of the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan described above and that may not be deductible.
In summary, if the stockholders approve this proposal, the material terms of the performance metrics and goals set forth in the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan, as described above, will constitute the framework within which the Compensation Committee will set specific performance metrics and goals for awards under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan between the dates of the 2015 and 2019 Annual Meetings, and will therefore preserve the Company's ability to obtain tax deductions for such compensation.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of material terms of the performance goals and metrics under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan.

PROPOSALS 6A AND 6B: AMENDMENTS TO THIRD RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO INCREASE AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK
The Board has unanimously approved amendments to article Fourth of our Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation (our charter) to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, from 200,000,000 shares to 300,000,000 shares, and (ii) increase the number of authorized shares of our preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, from 5,000,000 shares to 7,500,000shares. The Board has determined that the increase in authorized shares of common stock and the increase in authorized shares of preferred stock are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and has directed that the charter amendments be submitted to the stockholders for approval. The proposed charter amendments, if approved, will increase the authorized shares of preferred stock proportionately to the authorized shares of common stock, consistent with the Company’s current ratio of authorized preferred stock to authorized common stock.
Separate Proposals
Proposals 6A and 6B both relate to proposed amendments to our charter to increase the aggregate number of shares that we have the authority to issue. Proposal 6A concerns an amendment to the charter to effect the increase in authorized shares of common stock from 200,000,000 shares to 300,000,000 shares. Proposal 6B concerns an amendment to the charter to effect the increase in authorized shares of preferred stock from 5,000,000 shares to 7,500,000 shares. We are submitting these amendments to the stockholders as separate proposals so that stockholders are able to express their views on each amendment separately.
The charter amendment(s) approved by the requisite vote of our stockholders will become effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware reflecting such amendment(s). The approval of Proposal 6A is not conditioned on the approval of Proposal 6B, and the approval of Proposal 6B is not conditioned on the approval of Proposal 6A. Therefore, the Company will amend its charter to implement Proposal 6A or Proposal 6B, or both, to reflect each proposal receiving approval of at least a majority of the outstanding shares as of the record date and entitled to vote on such proposal.
Proposal 6A: Amendment to Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase Authorized Shares of Common Stock
Our charter presently authorizes us to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 162,697,001 shares were issued and outstanding at the close of business on March 16, 2015 (including shares issued in our recent public offering of common stock). In addition, as of March 16, 2015, (i) 3,445,835 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance under outstanding equity awards, (ii) 1,416,450 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance under future awards under our 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, and (iii) 355,906 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Based on the number of outstanding and reserved shares of common stock described above, we have only 32,084,808 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance for corporate purposes. If our Proposal No. 4 included herein to approve the Second Amended 2011 Stock Plan (thereby increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 7,000,000 shares) is approved, then we would have only 25,084,808 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance for corporate purposes.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 67

The additional shares of common stock for which authorization is sought would have identical rights as the shares of our common stock now authorized. Our stockholders do not presently have preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our securities and will not have any such rights to subscribe for the additional shares of common stock proposed to be authorized through the charter amendment.
If the charter amendment to increase the authorized shares of common stock is approved, the increase in authorized shares will not, by itself, have any effect on the rights of current holders of our common stock. However, the issuance of additional shares of our common stock may, among other things, have a dilutive effect on earnings per share and on the equity and voting rights of the current holders of our common stock.
Purpose of Charter Amendment to Increase Authorized Shares of Common Stock
As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, crude oil prices declined by nearly 50% during the fourth quarter of 2014 and continued to decline into the first quarter of 2015. While we have reduced planned capital spending in 2015 in light of the decline in commodity prices, given the uncertainty regarding the timing and magnitude of an eventual recovery of the market, we believe it is imperative to maintain liquidity and to efficiently access capital markets. Our Board and management believe additional shares of common stock should be authorized to provide us with flexibility in responding to changes in the Company’s cash flow in this volatile commodity market. In addition, as part of our business and growth strategy, we monitor and screen for potential strategic acquisitions of oil and gas properties, targeting complementary acquisitions in existing core areas. Shares of common stock may be issued as consideration for any such acquisition or in connection with the financing of an acquisition. Our Board and management believe that additional shares of our common stock should be authorized for issuance in order to provide the Company with greater flexibility in readily executing favorable acquisitions, and in considering and planning for these and other future general corporate needs.
Future purposes for additional shares could include, but would not be limited to, securing additional financing for working capital or capital expenditures, effecting acquisitions of other businesses or properties, paying stock dividends, subdividing outstanding shares through stock splits and providing equity incentives through our stock plan and other incentive plans. We have no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of additional shares of common stock resulting from the proposed increase in authorized shares of common stock.
If approved by our stockholders, the additional authorized shares of common stock would be available for issuance for any proper corporate purpose as determined by our Board without further approval by the stockholders, except as required by applicable law or stock exchange rules. The Board believes that the availability of additional shares of our common stock for issuance will enable us to take advantage of favorable opportunities without the delay and expense associated with holding a meeting of stockholders at the time such additional shares may be needed.
Potential Anti-Takeover Effect of Charter Amendment to Increase Authorized Shares of Common Stock
The proposed charter amendment to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect, although this is not the intent of the Board. For example, it may be possible for the Board to delay or impede a takeover or transfer of control of the Company by causing such additional authorized shares to be issued to holders who might side with the Board in opposing a takeover bid that the Board determines is not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The amendment to our charter, therefore, may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover attempts. By potentially discouraging initiation of any such unsolicited takeover attempt, the proposed charter amendment may limit the opportunity for our stockholders to dispose of their shares at the higher price generally available in takeover attempts or that may be available under a merger proposal. The proposed charter amendment may have the effect of permitting our current management, including the current Board of Directors, to retain its position, and place it in a better position to resist changes that stockholders may wish to make if they are dissatisfied with the conduct of the Company’s business.
In addition, our current charter contains certain provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company, including requiring the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding common stock to approve any merger or consolidation, or to approve any sale or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets.
We are not aware of any effort to accumulate our common stock or attempt to obtain control of our company by a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and the Board has not presented these proposals with the intent that they be utilized as a type of anti-takeover device.
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware General Corporation Law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the proposed amendment to our charter described in this Proposal 6A.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the amendment to the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 68

Proposal 6B: Amendment to Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase Authorized Shares of Preferred Stock
Our charter presently authorizes us to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, none of which were issued and outstanding at the close of business on March 16, 2015 and none of which were reserved for issuance or designated as of such date.
The 2,500,000 additional shares of preferred stock for which authorization is sought would be undesignated. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, and our Board may establish rights and attributes of any series of preferred stock, including dividend or interest rates, liquidation preferences, conversion prices, voting rights, redemption prices and similar matters. The specific terms of a particular series of preferred stock would be described in a certificate of designation relating to that series and could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock, substantially dilute the common stockholders’ interests in the Company and depress the price of our common stock. Under our charter, our stockholders do not have preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our securities and will not have any such rights to subscribe for the additional shares of preferred stock proposed to be authorized.
Purpose of Charter Amendment to Increase Authorized Shares of Preferred Stock
As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, crude oil prices declined by nearly 50% during the fourth quarter of 2014 and continued to decline into the first quarter of 2015. While we have reduced planned capital spending in 2015 in light of the decline in commodity prices, given the uncertainty regarding the timing and magnitude of an eventual recovery of the market, we believe it is imperative to maintain liquidity and to efficiently access capital markets. Our Board and management believe additional shares of preferred stock should be authorized to provide us with flexibility in responding to changes in the Company’s cash flow in this volatile commodity market. In addition, as part of our business and growth strategy, we monitor and screen for potential strategic acquisitions of oil and gas properties, targeting complementary acquisitions in existing core areas. Shares of preferred stock may be issued as consideration for any such acquisition or in connection with the financing of an acquisition. Our Board and management believe that additional shares of our preferred stock should be authorized for issuance in order to provide the Company with greater flexibility in readily executing favorable acquisitions, and in considering and planning for these and other future general corporate needs.
Future purposes for additional shares could include, but would not be limited to, issuances in public or private offerings of shares for cash, effecting acquisitions of other businesses or properties and pursuing additional financing opportunities. We have no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock resulting from the proposed increase in authorized shares of preferred stock.
If approved by our stockholders, the additional authorized shares of preferred stock would be available for issuance for any proper corporate purpose as determined by our Board without further approval by the stockholders, except as required by applicable law or stock exchange rules. The Board believes that the availability of additional shares of our preferred stock for issuance will enable us to take advantage of favorable opportunities without the delay and expense associated with holding a meeting of stockholders at the time such additional shares may be needed.
Potential Anti-Takeover Effect of Charter Amendment to Increase Authorized Shares of Preferred Stock
The proposed charter amendment to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect, although this is not the intent of the Board. For example, it may be possible for the Board to delay or impede a takeover or transfer of control of the Company by causing such additional authorized shares to be issued to holders who might side with the Board in opposing a takeover bid that the Board determines is not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The amendment to our charter, therefore, may have the effect of discouraging unsolicited takeover attempts. By potentially discouraging initiation of any such unsolicited takeover attempt, the proposed charter amendment may limit the opportunity for our stockholders to dispose of their shares at the higher price generally available in takeover attempts or that may be available under a merger proposal. The proposed charter amendment may have the effect of permitting our current management, including the current Board of Directors, to retain its position, and place it in a better position to resist changes that stockholders may wish to make if they are dissatisfied with the conduct of the Company’s business.
In addition, our current charter contains certain provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company, including requiring the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our outstanding common stock to approve any merger or consolidation, or to approve any sale or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets.
We are not aware of any effort to accumulate our capital stock or attempt to obtain control of our company by a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and the Board has not presented these proposals with the intent that they be utilized as a type of anti-takeover device.
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware General Corporation Law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the proposed amendment to our charter described in this Proposal 6B.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 69

Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the amendment to the Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 70

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth beneficial ownership information with respect to our common stock as of February 23, 2015 and March 16, 201515, 2016 for (1) each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (2) each of our directors and nominees for director, (3) each of our named executive officers referenced in the Summary Compensation Table, and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted, each person listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock listed below as beneficially owned by the person. As of February 23, 2015,March 15, 2016, we had 137,387,180198,137,564 shares outstanding. On March 3, 2015, we closed on a public offering of 25,300,000 shares of common stock. As a result, as of March 16, 2015, we had 162,697,001 shares of common stock outstanding. The table reflects both ownership percentages before and after the offering.

None of the shares beneficially owned by our executive officers or directors has been pledged as security for an obligation. Our insider trading policy prohibits our executive officers and directors from holding Newfield securities in a margin account or pledging Newfield securities as collateral for a loan.

 

 

 Beneficial Ownership(1)   
 
 
Name of Beneficial Owner
 Shares Percent @
March 15, 2016		  

​

 

Holders of More Than 5%:

 ​    ​

 

FMR LLC(2)

  11,865,636 6.0%  

​

 

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

 ​10,444,251 5.3% ​

 

Clearbridge Investments, LLC(4)

  10,081,309 5.1%  

​

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(5)

 ​13,750,032 6.9% ​

 

Wellington Management Group LLP (6)

  12,703,489 6.4%  

​

 

Management:

 ​    ​

 

Lee K. Boothby

  154,494 *  

​

 

George T. Dunn

 ​107,438 * ​

 

Pamela J. Gardner

  41,203 *  

​

 

John H. Jasek

 ​73,112 * ​

 

Lawrence S. Massaro

  52,545 *  

​

 

Steven W. Nance

 ​18,995 * ​

 

Gary D. Packer

  163,229 *  

​

 

Roger B. Plank

 ​16,017 * ​

 

Thomas G. Ricks

  47,427 *  

​

 

Juanita M. Romans

 ​33,779 * ​

 

John W. Schanck

  18,995 *  

​

 

J. Terry Strange

 ​42,199 * ​

 

James (Kent) Wells

  5,017 *  

​

 

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (consisting of 18 persons)

 ​876,976 * ​
 
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
Name of Beneficial OwnerShares 
Percent
@ 2/23/2015
 
Percent
@ 3/16/2015
Holders of More Than 5%:     
Citadel Advisors LLC(2) 
8,565,044 6.23% 5.26%
Millennium Management LLC(3)   
6,946,605 5.06% 4.27%
FMR LLC(4)  
7,505,625 5.46% 4.61%
BlackRock, Inc.(5)   
8,045,863 5.86% 4.95%
Clearbridge Investments, LLC(6)  
10,016,019 7.29% 6.16%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(7)   
11,195,321 8.15% 6.88%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:     
Lee K. Boothby170,048 * *
George T. Dunn108,870 * *
Pamela J. Gardner35,468 * *
John H. Jasek47,462 * *
John Randolph Kemp III36,976 * *
Lawrence S. Massaro31,126 * *
Steven W. Nance13,260 * *
Howard H, Newman207,202 * *
Gary D. Packer191,785 * *
Thomas G. Ricks41,692 * *
Juanita M. Romans34,468 * *
John W. Schanck13,260 * *
C. E. (Chuck) Shultz31,602 * *
Richard K. Stoneburner21,103 * *
J. Terry Strange36,411 * *
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (consisting of 15 persons)
1,015,074 * *
___________________
*Less than 1%
(1)The amounts shown include, as of February 23, 2015 and March 16, 2015: (a) shares of common stock held under Newfield’s 401(k) Plan for the accounts of participants; (b) shares of restricted stock;
*
Less than 1%

(1)
The amounts shown include, as of March 15, 2016: (a) shares of common stock held under Newfield's 401(k) Plan for the accounts of participants; (b) shares of restricted stock units; and (c) shares of common stock that may be acquired within 60 days through the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock units. The shares beneficially owned by Messrs. Boothby, Packer, Massaro, Dunn and Jasek and by our executive officers and directors as a group include 30,000 shares, 25,000 shares, 0 shares, 18,000 shares, 25,000 shares, and 108,080 shares, respectively, that may be acquired by such persons within 60 days after March 15, 2016 through the exercise of stock options. Mr. Massaro owns 4,168 restricted stock units. The shares beneficially owned by Messrs. Boothby, Packer, Massaro, Dunn and Jasek and by our executive officers and directors as a group include 30,000 shares, 25,000 shares, 0 shares, 18,000 shares, 25,000 shares, and 112,080 shares, respectively, that may be acquired by such persons within 60 days through the exercise of stock options. None of our NEOs or directors own restricted stock

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY - 2015 Proxy Statement 71

units that may vest within 60 days after February 23, 2015 or March 16, 2015.15, 2016. In addition, all of our NEOs have performance-based restricted stock units that may vest within 60 days after March 15, 2016, if certain performance criteria are met. Until stock options are exercised or restricted stock units vest, these individuals have neither voting nor investment power over the underlying shares of common stock.
(2)The Citadel 13G (as defined below) was jointly filed by Citadel Advisors LLC (“Citadel Advisors”), Citadel Advisors Holdings III LP (“CAH3”), Citadel GP LLC (“CGP”) and Mr. Kenneth Griffin (“Mr. Griffin,” and collectively with Citadel Advisors, CAH3 and CGP, the “Citadel Reporting Persons”), with respect to shares (and options to purchase shares) owned by Citadel Global Equities Master Fund Ltd., a Cayman Islands limited company (“CG”), Surveyor Capital Ltd., a Cayman Islands limited company (“SC”), Citadel Quantitative Strategies Master Fund Ltd., a Cayman Islands limited company (“CQ”) and Citadel Securities LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Citadel Securities”). Citadel Advisors is the portfolio manager for CG and SC. Citadel Advisors II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CA2”), is the portfolio manager of CQ. CAH3 is the managing member of Citadel Advisors and CA2. CALC III LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“CALC3”), is the non-member manager of Citadel Securities. CGP is the general partner of CALC3 and CAH3. Mr. Griffin is the President and Chief Executive Officer of, and owns a controlling interest in, CGP. Citadel Advisors has shared voting and shared dispositive power over 8,368,032 shares. CAH3 has shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 8,374,582 shares. CGP and Mr. Griffin have shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 8,565,044 shares. The address for the Citadel Reporting Persons is c/o Citadel LLC, 131 S. Dearborn Street, 32nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60603. This information is based on the Citadel Reporting Persons’ Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 4, 2015 (reporting ownership as of January 29, 2015) (the “Citadel Schedule 13G”). The percentages under the March 16, 2015 column assumes that none of the Citadel Reporting Persons purchased or sold any shares since the filing of the Citadel Schedule 13G.
(3)Millennium Management LLC (Millennium) is the general partner of the 100% shareholder of ICS Opportunities and Integrated Assets Ltd. and may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of Millennium. In addition, Israel A. Englander, the managing member of Millennium International Management GP and Millennium Management may also be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares. Millennium has shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 6,937,905 shares and 8,700 shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options. Millennium's address is 666 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10103. This information is based on Millennium's most recent Statement on Schedule 13G. The percentages under the March 16, 2015 column assumes that Millennium did not purchase or sell any shares since the filing of its Statement on Schedule 13G.
(4)FMR LLC (FMR), in its capacity as investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of FMR. FMR has sole voting power over 163,411 shares and sole dispositive power over 7,505,625 shares. FMR's address is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210. This information is based on FMR’s most recent Statement on Schedule 13G. The percentages under the March 16, 2015 column assumes that FMR did not purchase or sell any shares since the filing of its Statement on Schedule 13G.
(5)BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock), in its capacity as a parent holding company or control person for various subsidiaries (none of which individually owns more than 5% of our outstanding common stock), may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares. BlackRock has sole voting power over 7,035,567 shares and sole dispositive power over 8,045,863 shares. BlackRock’s address is 55 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10022. This information is based on BlackRock’s most recent Statement on Schedule 13G. The percentages under the March 16, 2015 column assumes that BlackRock did not purchase or sell any shares since the filing of its Statement on Schedule 13G.
(5)Clearbridge Investments, LLC (Clearbridge), in its capacity as an investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of Clearbridge. Clearbridge has sole voting power over 9,872,933 shares and sole dispositive power over 10,016,019 shares. Clearbridge’s address is 620 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10018. This information is based on Clearbridge’s most recent Statement on Schedule 13G. The percentages under the March 16, 2015 column assumes that Clearbridge did not purchase or sell any shares since the filing of its Statement on Schedule 13G.
(6)The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard), in its capacity as an investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of Vanguard. Vanguard has sole voting power over 194,536 shares and shared dispositive power over 182,336 shares, as well as sole dispositive power of 11,012,985 shares. Vanguard’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. This information is based on Vanguard’s most recent Statement on Schedule 13G. The percentages under the March 16, 2015 column assumes that Vanguard did not purchase or sell any shares since the filing of its Statement on Schedule 13G.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    722016 PROXY STATEMENT        69

Table of Contents

(2)
FMR LLC (FMR), in its capacity as investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of FMR. FMR has sole voting power over 243,503 shares and sole dispositive power over 11,865,636 shares. FMR's address is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210. This information is based on FMR's most recent Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 2016.

(3)
BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock), in its capacity as a parent holding company or control person for various subsidiaries (none of which individually owns more than 5% of our outstanding common stock), may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares. BlackRock has sole voting power over 9,035,941 shares and sole dispositive power over 10,444,251 shares. BlackRock's address is 55 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10022. This information is based on BlackRock's most recent Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2016.

(4)
Clearbridge Investments, LLC (Clearbridge), in its capacity as an investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of Clearbridge. Clearbridge has sole voting power over 9,957,740 shares and sole dispositive power over 10,081,309 shares. Clearbridge's address is 620 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10018. This information is based on Clearbridge's most recent Statement on Schedule 13G. filed on February 16, 2016

(5)
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard), in its capacity as an investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of Vanguard. Vanguard has sole voting power over 259,842 shares and shared dispositive power over 258,942 shares, as well as sole dispositive power of 13,491,090 shares. Vanguard's address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. This information is based on Vanguard's most recent Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2016.

(6)
Wellington Management Group LLP (Wellington), in its capacity as an investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares, which are held by clients of Wellington. Wellington has sole voting power over 10,121,048 shares and sole dispositive power over 12,703,489 shares. Wellington's address is c/o Wellington Management Company LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210. This information is based on Wellington's most recent Statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2016.

SECTION 16(a)16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE


Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These persons are required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of these reports. Based solely on our review of the copies of these reports received by us during fiscal year 20142015 and representations from certain reporting persons that they have complied with the relevant filing requirements, we believe that all such filing requirements were complied with during the year ended December 31, 2014;2015; provided that, due to clerical processing delays, Matthew Vezzaeach of Timothy Yang and Roger Plank filed a Form 3 late, and each of Lee BoothbyMatthew Vezza and Gary PackerCharles Shultz filed aone late report on Form 4 and James Wells filed two late reports on Form 4.

​

70        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Newfield Board of Directors currently consists of the six directors whose names appear below. Each member of the Audit Committee is "independent" as defined in the NYSE's listing standards. The primary purposes of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board in monitoring:

    •
    the integrity of Newfield's financial statements and financial reporting processes and systems of internal control;

    •
    the qualifications and independence of Newfield's independent auditors;

    •
    the performance of Newfield's internal audit function and independent auditors; and

    •
    Newfield's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, retaining and terminating Newfield's independent auditors and also performs the specific functions set forth in its charter, which is available on our website. Go tohttp://www.newfield.com and then to the "Corporate Governance – Overview" tab.

The Audit Committee held five meetings in person or by telephone conference during 2015. The meetings were designed to facilitate and encourage communication between the Audit Committee and Newfield's internal auditors and independent auditors.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with Newfield's management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Newfield's independent auditors, the audited financial statements of Newfield included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Newfield's independent auditors all communications required by the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), including those required by the PCAOB's Interim Standard AU section 380, "Communication with Audit Committees". The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors' communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP such independent auditors' independence. The Audit Committee also has considered whether the provision of non-audit services to Newfield by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining their independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to Newfield's Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in Newfield's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC.

This report is submitted on behalf of the Audit Committee.

                        Thomas G. Ricks, Chair
                        Pamela J. Gardner
                        Roger B. Plank
                        John W. Schanck
                        J. Terry Strange
                        J. Kent Wells

The foregoing Audit Committee Report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        71

Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 were as follows:

 
 Category of Service
  
 2014
  
 2015
  
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Audit fees

 ​ $1,839,825 ​ $2,185,775 ​
​  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

 

 

Audit-related fees

    40,775    52,881  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Tax fees

 ​ ​64,000 ​ ​134,500 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

All other fees

    —    —  
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Total

 ​ $1,944,600 ​ $2,373,156 ​
​  ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

The audit fees for 2014 and 2015 were for professional services rendered in connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements and reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements within such years. These fees also include the issuance of comfort letters, consents and assistance with review of various documents filed with the SEC in 2014 and 2015. The audit-related fees for 2014 and 2015 were for services related to accounting consultations. Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, including the preparation of local tax returns and international tax returns.

The Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services, including tax services, performed by our independent auditors as well as the fees charged for these services. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority for these services to one late transaction.

or more members, whose decisions are then presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In its review of all non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible effect of these services on the independence of our independent auditors.

OTHER INFORMATION

Other Business
OTHER BUSINESS

Our Board does not know of any other matters that are to be presented for action at the meeting. If any other matters are brought before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by our Board. If no recommendation is given, the proxy holders will vote in their discretion.

Proxy Solicitation
PROXY SOLICITATION

The expense of soliciting proxies will be paid by Newfield. Newfield has retained Georgeson Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies at an estimated fee of $7,500 plus expenses. Some of the executive officers and other employees of Newfield may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, mail, facsimile, or other means of communication, if deemed appropriate. Newfield will reimburse brokers or other persons holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of Newfield’sNewfield's common stock.

Stockholder Proposals for 2016STOCKHOLDER LIST

A complete list of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and Director Nominations

will be available for viewing during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days before the Annual Meeting at our offices at 4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77380. The list of stockholders will also be available for stockholders during the Annual Meeting through the linkwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016.

​

72        NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |    2016 PROXY STATEMENT

Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2017 ANNUAL MEETING AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

Under SEC regulations, if a stockholder wants us to include a proposal in our Proxy Statement and form of proxy for our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices at 4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77380 by December 4, 2015.

November 24, 2016.

Under our Bylaws, and as SEC regulations permit, stockholders must follow certain procedures to nominate a person for election as a director or to introduce an item of business at a meeting of our stockholders. Under these procedures, stockholders must submit the proposed nominee or item of business by delivering notice to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices at the address set forth above. We must receive notice as follows:

    •
    Normally, for an Annual Meeting we must receive the notice not less than 75 days or more than 120 days before the first anniversary of the prior year’syear's meeting. For our 20162017 Annual Meeting, we must receive notice no earlier than January 14, 201617, 2017 and no later than February 28, 2016.
March 3, 2017.

•
However, if we hold the Annual Meeting on a date that is more than 15 days before or 30 days after such anniversary date, we must receive the notice by the later of (i) 75 days before the Annual Meeting and (ii) 10 days after the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made.


•
If we hold a special meeting, we must receive the notice by the later of (i) 75 days before the special meeting and (ii) 10 days after the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made.

The notice is required to contain certain information set forth in our Bylaws about both the nominee or proposed business, as applicable, and the stockholder making the nomination or proposal. A nomination or proposal that does not comply with these requirements will be disregarded.

Additional Information Available
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE

For stockholders receiving paper copies of this Proxy Statement, a copy of our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 20142015 (which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014)2015) will accompany the Proxy Statement. For stockholders receiving notice only, the Proxy Statement and our 20142015 Annual Report will be available electronically.

Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, as filed with the SEC, are also available on our website (http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=63798&p=proxywww.newfield.com)or you may request a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (without exhibits) and/or the Proxy Statement, without charge, by writing to our Investor Relations Department at 4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77380. None of the information contained in our Annual Report is proxy solicitation material.


​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    - 2015 Proxy Statement|    2016 PROXY STATEMENT        73

Table of Contents

APPENDIX A

EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Domestic Production (sales + lease fuel)

Production volumes sold plus lease fuel (natural gas consumed in operations) is a measure not in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Production for GAAP purposes excludes lease fuel consumed in operations. Production volumes sold plus lease fuel is in some cases more comparable to estimates provided by competitors or security analysts.

​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​
 
 Domestic Production
(sales + lease fuel)
  
 Year ended December 31, 2015
  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​
 
  
  
 Crude Oil and
Condensate
(MMBbls)
  
 NGLs
(MMBbls)
  
 Natural Gas
(Bcf)
  
 Total Oil
Equivalents
(MMBOE)
  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Domestic production

 ​ ​21.3 ​ ​8.6 ​ ​116.3 ​ ​49.3 ​
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Plus: fuel

    —    —    7.7    1.3  
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Total domestic production (sales + lease fuel)

 ​ ​21.3 ​ ​8.6 ​ ​124.0 ​ ​50.6 ​
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

Domestic Proved Reserves Replacement Ratio

Proved reserve-replacement ratio is a non-GAAP measure. The reserve-replacement ratio measures the amount of proved reserves added to a company's reserve base during the year relative to the amount of oil and gas produced. This reserve-replacement ratio is just one method investors should consider when evaluating exploration and production company performance. Since this ratio is a non-GAAP measure, it should be considered in the context of other operating metrics.

​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

Replacement Ratio of Domestic Proved Reserves

MMBOE

​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

Domestic proved oil and gas reserves, December 31, 2014

​​622​​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

Change in proved oil and gas reserves attributable to:

​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

Extensions, discoveries and other

​​101​
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

Tank Revisions

19
​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​

​  

Volumes attributable to new proved locations

​​120a​
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

Production

(50)b
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

Revisions of previous estimates (excluding tank revisions)

​​(186)​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

Net acquisitions and divestitures

(7)
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

Domestic proved oil and gas reserves, December 31, 2015

​​499​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

Replacement Ratio of Domestic Proved Reserves (1)

236%=a/b
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​



(1)
Percentage calculation used actual amounts, table amounts include immaterial rounding
Appendix A

Explanation

Discretionary Cash Flow (Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities before Changes in Operating Assets and ReconciliationLiabilities)

Discretionary cash flow, or net cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities, is presented because of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Cash flow from operations and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio are supplemental financial measures used by the Company’s management and by securities analysts, investors, lenders, rating agencies and others who follow the industryits acceptance as an indicator of the Company’san oil and gas exploration and production company's ability to internally fund exploration and development activities and to service or incur additional debt. The Company also uses these measures becauseDiscretionary cash flow from operationsis a non-GAAP financial

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |AppendixA-1

Table of Contents

measure, and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio relate to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements that the Company may not control and may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred. Further, cash flow from operations and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio allow the Company to compare its operating performance and return on capital with those of other companies without regard to financing methods and capital structure. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute foran alternative to net cash provided by operating activities prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

as defined by GAAP.

Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA
Year ended
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
Year ended
December 31, 2013
(in millions)
Net income (loss)900
147
Adjustments to derive EBITDA:  
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest147
152
Income tax provision (benefit)526
229
Depreciation, depletion and amortization903
930
EBITDA2,476
1,458
Adjustments to derive Adjusted EBITDA:  
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense28
43
Net unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivatives(649)157
Gain on sale of Malaysia business(373)—
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
1,482
1,658
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used as supplemental financial measures by our management and by external users of financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and rating agencies, to assess: (1) the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structures, the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest and support our indebtedness, historical costs and changes in the market value of our commodity derivatives; (2) our operating performance and return on capital as compared to those of other companies, without regarding to financing and capital structure; and (3) the vitality of project and the overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives to net income or income from operations, operating income, cash flow from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to represent GAAP-based cash flows. We have reconciled our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA amounts to our consolidated net cash provided by operating activities.
 
Year ended
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
Year ended
December 31, 2013
(in millions)
EBITDA2,476
1,458
Adjustments to derive Adjusted EBITDA:  
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense28
43
Net unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivatives(649)157
Gain on sale of Malaysia business(373)—
Adjusted EBITDA1,482
1,658
Adjustments to reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities:  
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest(147)(152)
Current income tax provision(17)(86)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities48
11
Other non-cash items21
14
Net cash provided by operating activities1,387
1,445
   
Long Term Debt2,892
3,694
Cash and cash equivalents(14)(95)
Net Debt(2)
2,878
3,599
Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA(1)(2)
1.942.17
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​
 
 Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to discretionary cash flow
  
 Year ended
December 31,
2015
(in millions)
  
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 ​ $1,209 ​
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​ ​​

 

 

Net change in operating assets

    (38) 
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​

​  

 

Discretionary cash flow

 ​ $1,171 ​
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​ ​​

Domestic Controllable Expense per Unit (BOE)

Controllable per unit costs is a non-GAAP metric which presents certain costs under management's control per BOE produced. This ratio is just one method investors should consider when evaluating exploration and production company performance. Since this ratio is a non-GAAP measure, it should be considered in the context of other operating metrics.

​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​
 
 Domestic Controllable Expense by Unit
  
 Year ended
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Recurring lease operating expense

 ​ $(207)  ​
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Major lease operating expense

    (24)   
​ ​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Net cash general & administrative cost

 ​ ​(257)  ​
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

 

 

Total controllable expenses

   $(488)a  
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

 

      

MMBOE

  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Domestic production

 ​ ​(50.6)b ​
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

 

 

Per Unit Expense (1)

   $9.66 =a/b  
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

(1)
Per unit calculation used actual amounts, table amounts include immaterial rounding.

Appendix A - 1

Domestic Finding and Development Costs
(1)

The Company defines EBITDA as income (loss) before interest, income taxes and depreciation, depletion and amortization. The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA before ceiling test and other impairments, non-cash stock-based compensation expense and the net unrealized gain or loss on commodity derivatives.

(2) The Company defines net debt as total debt less cash and cash equivalents.

Production (MMBOE)Year ended December 31, 2014
 Crude Oil and Condensate (MMBbls) NGLs (MMBbls) Natural Gas (Bcf) Total Oil Equivalents (MMBOE)
Production - continuing operations19.0
 8.2
 126.6
 48.4
Production - discontinued operations0.8
 —
 —
 0.8
Total consolidated production19.8
 8.2
 126.6
 49.2
Less: production attributable to assets sold:       
Gulf of Mexico—
 —
 —
 —
Granite Wash0.3
 0.8
 10.6
 2.9
Malaysia - discontinued operations0.8
 —
 —
 0.8
Total production attributable to assets sold1.1
 0.8
 10.6
 3.7
Consolidated production net of production attributable to assets sold18.7
 7.4
 116.0
 45.5
        
Domestic18.5
 8.2
 126.6
 47.9
China0.5
 —
 —
 0.5
Total continuing operations19.0
 8.2
 126.6
 48.4

Proved Reserves (MMBOE)2014
 Crude Oil and Condensate (MMBbls) NGLs (MMBbls) Natural Gas (Bcf) Total Oil Equivalents (MMBOE)
Proved oil and gas reserves, before adjustment for asset sales301
 76
 1,607
 645
Less: proved oil and gas reserves attributable to assets sold:       
Gulf of Mexico—
 —
 —
 —
Malaysia—
 —
 —
 —
Granite Wash—
 —
 —
 —
Total proved oil and gas reserves attributable to assets sold—
 —
 —
 —
Proved oil and gas reserves, net of reserves attributable to sold assets301
 76
 1,607
 645
        
Domestic proved oil and gas reserves, before adjustment for asset sales278
 76
 1,607
 622
Less: proved reserves attributable to Granite Wash and Gulf of Mexico assets—
 —
 —
 —
Domestic proved reserves, net of reserves attributable to asset sales278
 76
 1,607
 622

Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to discretionary cash flow, net of asset sales
Year ended
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,387
Less: operating cash flow attributable to assets sold 
Gulf of Mexico(2)
Malaysia43
Granite Wash76
Total operating cash flow attributable to assets sold117
Net cash provided by operating activities, net of operating cash flows attributable to sold assets1,270
Net change in working capital(48)
Discretionary cash flow, net of assets sold$1,222


Appendix A - 2

Reconciliation of standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows to PV-10 value (before tax) and after asset sales
Year ended
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows$6,212
Present value of future income tax expense2,575
PV-10 value (before tax) - before adjustment for asset sales8,787
Less: PV-10 value attributable to assets sold 
Gulf of Mexico—
Malaysia—
Granite Wash—
Total PV-10 value attributable to assets sold—
PV-10 value (before tax), net of PV-10 value attributable to sold assets$8,787

Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to domestic discretionary cash flow
Year ended
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,387
Less: operating cash flow attributable to international operations47
Net cash provided by operating activities, net of operating cash flows attributable to international operations1,340
Net change in working capital(48)
Domestic discretionary cash flow$1,292

Reconciliation of domestic finding and development costs
Year ended
December 31, 2014
(in millions)
 
Domestic Finding and Development Costs per BOE  
Total Domestic Costs Incurred$2,013
 
Less: Costs incurred other than finding and development activities:  
Capitalized direct internal costs(187) 
Geological and geophysical costs(143) 
Construction costs(68) 
Acquisitions(33) 
Other(36) 
Domestic finding and development costs$1,546
a
   
 MMBOE 
Domestic proved developed oil and gas reserves, December 31, 2013322
 
Change in proved developed oil and gas reserves attributable to:  
Production(48) 
Net acquisitions and divestitures(37) 
Other revisions(1) 
Change in proved developed oil and gas reserves before finding and development activities(86) 
Change in proved developed oil and gas reserves attributable to finding and development activities93
b
Domestic proved developed oil and gas reserves, December 31, 2014329
 
   
Domestic Development Costs (1)
$16.62
=a/b

(1) The Company defines domestic finding and development costs as the 2014 domestic costs incurred less capitalized direct internal costs, geological and geophysical costs, land costs, construction costs, acquisitions and other costs, which are related to asset retirement obligations. We divide the domestic finding and development costs by new proved developed reserves attributable to finding and development activities. New proved developed reserves are sourced from proved undeveloped conversions, additions/extensions and infill drilling. Management believes achieving low-cost operational performance is critical to our long-term objectives. This goal assesses the Company’sCompany's ability to realize “continuous"continuous cost to manufacture new well”well" improvements that drive the intrinsic value of

​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY    |AppendixA-2

Table of Contents

the Company’sCompany's key resource plays’plays' learning curves through either lower well costs and/or greater ultimate recoveries.


Appendix A - 3
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​
 
 Domestic Finding and Development Costs per BOE
  
 Year ended
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Total Domestic Costs Incurred

 ​ $1,512   ​
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Less: Costs incurred other than finding and development activities:

         
​​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Capitalized direct internal costs

 ​ ​(107)  ​
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

 

 

Geological, geophysical, and land costs

    (186)   
​ ​​​​ ​​ ​​​ ​​

​  

 

Construction costs

 ​ ​(50)  ​
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

 

 

Acquisitions

    (128)   
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Other

 ​ ​(2)  ​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

 

 

Domestic finding and development costs

   $1,039 a  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

 

      

MMBOE

  
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

 

 

Domestic proved developed oil and gas reserves, December 31, 2014

 ​ ​329   ​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

 

 

Change in proved developed oil and gas reserves attributable to:

         
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Production

 ​ ​(50)  ​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

 

 

Net acquisitions and divestitures

    (2)   
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Other revisions

 ​ ​(42)  ​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

 

 

Change in proved developed oil and gas reserves before finding and development activities

    (94)   
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Change in proved developed oil and gas reserves attributable to finding and development activities (1)

 ​ ​84 b ​
​​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

 

 

Domestic proved developed oil and gas reserves, December 31, 2015

    319    
​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​ ​​ ​​

​  

 

Domestic Development Costs

 ​ $12.37 =a/b ​
​ ​​ ​​​​ ​ ​​​​

APPENDIX B

(1)
Defined as performance revisions related to positive tank revisions, transfers, extensions, discoveries and other additions.
​

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

2011 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
Effective May 5, 2011
As Amended and Restated May 15, 2015

|Appendix B - 1
A-3


TABLE OF CONTENTS
   
  
  Page   
 
ARTICLE IESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND DURATION1
1.1Establishment1
1.2Purpose of the Plan1
1.3Duration of the Plan1
   
ARTICLE IIDEFINITIONS1
2.1Affiliate1
2.2Award1
2.3Award Agreement1
2.4Board1
2.5Change of Control1
2.6Code2
2.7Committee2
2.8Company2
2.9Corporate Change2
2.10Covered Employee2
2.11Director2
2.12Disability2
2.13Dividend Equivalent2
2.14Effective Date2
2.15Employee2
2.16Exchange Act2
2.17Fair Market Value2
2.18Fiscal Year3
2.19Full Value Award3
2.20Holder3
2.21Incumbent Director3
2.22ISO3
2.23Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation3
2.24NSO3
2.25Option3
2.26Optionee3
2.27Option Price3
2.28Parent Corporation3
2.29Performance-Based Compensation3
2.30Performance Goals3
2.31Performance Stock Award3
2.32Performance Unit Award4
2.33Period of Restriction4
2.34Person4
2.35Plan4
2.36Restricted Stock4
2.37Restricted Stock Award4
2.38RSU4

Appendix B - 2

2.39RSU Award4
2.40Section 409A4
2.41Share4
2.42Stock4
2.43Subsidiary Corporation4
2.44Substantial Risk of Forfeiture4
2.45Ten Percent Stockholder4
2.46Termination of Employment4
ARTICLE IIIELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION4
3.1Eligibility4
3.2Participation4
   
ARTICLE IVGENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO AWARDS5
4.1Authority to Grant Awards5
4.2Dedicated Shares; Award Limitations5
4.3Non-Transferability5
4.4Requirements of Law6
4.5Changes in the Company’s Capital Structure6
4.6Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code7
4.7Forfeiture for Cause8
4.8Forfeiture Events8
4.9Recoupment in Restatement Situations8
4.10Award Agreements8
4.11Amendments of Award Agreements; Repricing Prohibitions8
4.12Rights as Stockholder8
4.13Issuance of Shares of Stock8
4.14Restrictions on Stock Received9
4.15Compliance With Section 409A9
4.16Source of Shares Deliverable Under Awards9
4.17Date of Grant9
   
ARTICLE VOPTIONS9
5.1Authority to Grant Options9
5.2Type of Options Available9
5.3Option Agreement9
5.4Option Price9
5.5Duration of Option9
5.6Amount Exercisable9
5.7Exercise of Option10
5.8Notification of Disqualifying Disposition10
5.9$100,000 Limitation on ISOs10
   
ARTICLE VIRESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS10
6.1Restricted Stock Awards10
6.2Restricted Stock Award Agreement10
6.3Holder’s Rights as Stockholder10
   
ARTICLE VIIRESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS11
7.1Authority to Grant RSU Awards11
7.2RSU Award11
7.3RSU Award Agreement11
7.4No Dividend Equivalents11

Appendix B - 3

7.5Form of Payment Under RSU Award11
7.6Time of Payment Under RSU Award11
   
ARTICLE VIIIPERFORMANCE STOCK AWARDS AND PERFORMANCE UNIT AWARDS11
8.1Authority to Grant Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards11
8.2Performance Goals11
8.3Time of Establishment of Performance Goals12
8.4Written Agreement12
8.5Form of Payment Under Performance Unit Award12
8.6Time of Payment Under Performance Unit Award12
8.7Holder’s Rights as Stockholder With Respect to a Performance Stock Award12
8.8Increases Prohibited12
8.9Stockholder Approval12
8.10No Dividend Equivalents12
8.11Dividends12
   
ARTICLE IXSUBSTITUTION AWARDS13
   
ARTICLE XADMINISTRATION13
10.1Awards13
10.2Authority of the Committee13
10.3Decisions Binding13
10.4No Liability13
   
ARTICLE XIAMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN14
11.1Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination14
11.2Awards Previously Granted14
   
ARTICLE XIIACCELERATION OF VESTING FOR CERTAIN AWARDS UPON A CHANGE OF CONTROL14
   
ARTICLE XIIIMISCELLANEOUS14
13.1Unfunded Plan/No Establishment of a Trust Fund14
13.2No Employment Obligation14
13.3Tax Withholding14
13.4Indemnification of the Committee15
13.5Gender and Number15
13.6Severability15
13.7Headings15
13.8Other Compensation Plans15
13.9Retirement and Welfare Plans15
13.10Other Awards16
13.11Successors16
13.12Law Limitations/Governmental Approvals16
13.13Delivery of Title16
13.14Inability to Obtain Authority16
13.15Investment Representations16
13.16Persons Residing Outside of the United States16
13.17No Fractional Shares16
13.18Governing Law16

Appendix B - 4


GRAPHIC

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

2011 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
ARTICLE I
ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND DURATION

1.1  Establishment.4 Waterway Square Place, Suite 100
The Company hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan, to be known as the “Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan”, as set forth in this document. The Plan permits the grant of Options, Restricted Stock, RSUs, Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards. The Plan shall become effective on the later of (a) the date the Plan is approved by the Board and (b) the date the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company (the “Effective Date”).

1.2 Purpose of the Plan. The Plan is intended to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the Company by providing certain directors, officers, and Employees of, the Company and its Affiliates with incentives to maximize stockholder value and to otherwise contribute to the success of the Company, thereby aligning the interests of such service providers with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.
1.3 Duration of the Plan. The Plan shall continue indefinitely until it is terminated pursuant to Section 11.1. No ISOs may be granted under the Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. The applicable provisions of the Plan will continue in effect with respect to an Award granted under the Plan for as long as such Award remains outstanding.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
The words and phrases defined in this Article shall have the meaning set out below throughout the Plan, unless the context in which any such word or phrase appears reasonably requires a broader, narrower or different meaning.
2.1  “Affiliate” means any corporation, partnership, limited liability company or association, trust or other entity or organization which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company. For purposes of the preceding sentence, “control” (including, with correlative meanings, the terms “controlled by” and “under common control with”), as used with respect to any entity or organization, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power (a) to vote more than fifty percent (50%) of the securities having ordinary voting power for the election of directors of the controlled entity or organization, or (b) to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the controlled entity or organization, whether through the ownership of voting securities or by contract or otherwise.
2.2 “Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of Options, Restricted Stock, RSUs, Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards, in each case subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan.
2.3 “Award Agreement” means a written agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions applicable to an Award granted under the Plan.
2.4 “Board” means the board of directors of the Company.
2.5 “Change of Control” means the occurrence of one of the following events:
(a) the Company is not the surviving Person in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization (or survives only as a subsidiary of another Person),

Appendix B - 5

(b) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with another Person and as a result of such merger or consolidation less than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving or resulting corporation will be issued in respect of the capital stock of the Company,
(c) the Company sells, leases or exchanges all or substantially all of its assets to any other Person,
(d) the Company is to be dissolved and liquidated,
(e) any Person, including a “group” as contemplated by Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires or gains ownership or control (including the power to vote) of more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s voting stock (based upon voting power) or
(f) individuals who are Incumbent Directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of Article XII, (A) the definition of “Change of Control” shall not include clause (a) above or any merger, consolidation, reorganization, sale, lease, exchange, or similar transaction involving solely the Company and one or more Persons that were wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company immediately prior to such event and (B) with respect to Restricted Stock Unit Awards, Performance Stock Unit Awards and any Award that is intended to comply with (rather than be exempt from) the requirements of Section 409A), an event listed above in this Section 2.5 shall not constitute a “Change of Control” unless the event is a “change in control event” within the meaning of Department of Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-3(i)(5).
2.6 “Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
2.7 “Committee” means (a) in the case of an Award granted to a Director, the Board, and (b) in the case of any other Award granted under the Plan, a committee of at least two persons, who are members of the Compensation Committee of the Board and are appointed by the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Board, or, to the extent it chooses to operate as the Committee, the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Board. Each member of the Committee in respect of his or her participation in any decision with respect to an Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code must satisfy the requirements of “outside director” status within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Code; provided, however, that the failure to satisfy such requirement shall not affect the validity of the action of any committee otherwise duly authorized and acting in the matter. For all purposes of the Plan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company shall be deemed to be the “Committee” with respect to Awards granted by him or her pursuant to Section 4.1.
2.8 “Company” means Newfield Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation, or any successor (by reincorporation, merger or otherwise).
2.9 “Corporate Change” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 4.5(c).
2.10 “Covered Employee” means an Employee who is a “covered employee,” as defined in section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations or other guidance promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service under section 162(m) of the Code, or any successor statute.
2.11 “Director” means a director of the Company who is not an Employee.
2.12 “Disability” means as determined by the Committee in its discretion exercised in good faith, (a) in the case of an Award that is exempt from the application of the requirements of Section 409A, a physical or mental condition of the Holder that would entitle him to payment of disability income payments under the Company’s long-term disability insurance policy or plan for employees as then in effect; or in the event that the Holder is a Director or is not covered, for whatever reason, under the Company’s long-term disability

Appendix B - 6

insurance policy or plan for employees or in the event the Company does not maintain such a long-term disability insurance policy, “Disability” means a permanent and total disability as defined in section 22(e)(3) of the Code and (b) in the case of an Award that is not exempt from the application of the requirements of Section 409A, (i) the Holder is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (ii) the Holder is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company. A determination of Disability may be made by a physician selected or approved by the Committee and, in this respect, the Holder shall submit to an examination by such physician upon request by the Committee.
2.13 “Dividend Equivalent” means a payment equivalent in amount to dividends paid to the Company’s stockholders.
2.14 “Effective Date” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 1.1.
2.15 “Employee” means a person employed by the Company or any Affiliate as a common law employee.
2.16 “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or any successor act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, as such laws, rules and regulations may be amended from time to time.
2.17 “Fair Market Value” of the Stock as of any particular date means,
(a) if the Stock is traded on a stock exchange,
(1) and if the Stock is traded on that date, the mean of the high and low sales prices of the Stock on that date; or
(2) and if the Stock is not traded on that date, the mean of the high and low sales prices of the Stock on the last trading date immediately preceding that date;
as reported on the principal securities exchange on which the Stock is traded (or such other reporting service as is approved by the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Board); or
(b) if the Stock is traded in the over-the-counter market,
(1) and if the Stock is traded on that date, the average between the high bid and low asked price on that date; or
(2) and if the Stock is not traded on that date, the average between the high bid and low asked price on the last trading date immediately preceding that date;
as reported in such over-the-counter market; provided, however, that (x) if the Stock is not so traded, or (y) if, in the discretion of the Committee, another means of determining the fair market value of a Share at such date shall be necessary or advisable, the Committee may provide for another method or means for determining such fair market value, which method or means shall comply with the requirements of a reasonable valuation method as described under Section 409A.
2.18 “Fiscal Year” means the Company’s fiscal year.
2.19 “Full Value Award” means an Award other than in the form of an ISO or NSO, and which is settled by the issuance of Shares.

Appendix B - 7

2.20 “Holder” means a person who has been granted an Award or any person who is entitled to receive Shares or cash under an Award.
2.21 “Incumbent Director” means:
(a) a member of the Board on the Effective Date; or
(b) an individual:
(1) who becomes a member of the Board after the Effective Date;
(2) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders is approved or recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds of the then serving Incumbent Directors (as defined herein); and
(3) whose initial assumption of service on the Board is not in connection with an actual or threatened election contest.
2.22 “ISO” means an Option that is intended to be an “incentive stock option” that satisfies the requirements of section 422 of the Code.
2.23 “Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation” means, with respect to an Award, the amount the Company or an Affiliate is required to withhold for federal, state, local and foreign taxes based upon the applicable minimum statutory withholding rates required by the relevant tax authorities.
2.24 “NSO” means an Option that is intended to be a “nonqualified stock option” that does not satisfy the requirements of section 422 of the Code.
2.25 “Option” means an option to purchase Stock granted pursuant to Article V.
2.26 “Optionee” means a person who has been granted an Option or any other person who is entitled to exercise an Option under the Plan.
2.27 “Option Price” has the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 5.4.
2.28 “Parent Corporation” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company if, at the time of the action or transaction, each of the corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.
2.29 “Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation under an Award that is intended by the Committee to satisfy the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code for deductibility of remuneration paid to Covered Employees.
2.30 “Performance Goals” means one or more of the criteria described in Section 8.2 on which the performance goals applicable to an Award are based.
2.31 “Performance Stock Award” means an Award providing for an issuance of Stock that is designated as a performance stock award granted pursuant to Article VIII.
2.32 “Performance Unit Award” means an Award providing designated as a performance unit award granted pursuant to Article VIII.
2.33 “Period of Restriction” means the period during which Restricted Stock is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion), as provided in Article VI.

Appendix B - 8

2.34 “Person” means any individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, trust, incorporated or unincorporated organization or association or other legal entity of any kind.
2.35 “Plan” means the Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan, as set forth in this document as it may be amended from time to time.
2.36 “Restricted Stock” means shares of restricted Stock issued or granted under the Plan pursuant to Article VI.
2.37 “Restricted Stock Award” means an authorization by the Committee to issue or transfer Restricted Stock to a Holder.
2.38 “RSU” means a restricted stock unit credited to a Holder’s ledger account maintained by the Company pursuant to Article VII.
2.39 “RSU Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Article VII.
2.40 “Section 409A” means section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury rules and regulations issued thereunder.
2.41 “Share” means a share of Stock.
2.42 “Stock” means the common stock of the Company, $0.01 par value per share (or such other par value as may be designated by act of the Company’s stockholders).
2.43 “Subsidiary Corporation” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, at the time of the action or transaction, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in an unbroken chain owns stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.
2.44 “Substantial Risk of Forfeiture” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 409A.
2.45 “Ten Percent Stockholder” means an individual who, at the time the Option is granted, owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock or series of the Company or of any Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation. An individual shall be considered as owning the stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for his brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half blood), spouse, ancestors and lineal descendants; and stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for a corporation, partnership, estate or trust, shall be considered as being owned proportionately by or for its stockholders, partners or beneficiaries.
2.46 “Termination of Employment” means, in the case of an Award other than an ISO, the termination of the Award recipient’s employment relationship with the Company and all Affiliates. “Termination of Employment” means, in the case of an ISO, the termination of the Employee’s employment relationship with all of the Company, any Parent Corporation, any Subsidiary Corporation and any parent or subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of section 422(a)(2) of the Code) of any such corporation that issues or assumes an ISO in a transaction to which section 424(a) of the Code applies.
ARTICLE III
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
3.1  Eligibility. Except as otherwise specified in this Section 3.1, the persons who are eligible to receive Awards under the Plan, other than ISOs, are Employees and Directors. Only those persons who are, on the dates of grant, key employees of the Company or any Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation are eligible for grants of ISOs under the Plan.

Appendix B - 9

3.2 Participation. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select the eligible persons to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine the nature and amount of each Award.
ARTICLE IV
GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO AWARDS
4.1  Authority to Grant Awards. The Committee may grant Awards to those key Employees and other eligible persons as the Committee shall from time to time determine, under the terms and conditions of the Plan. Subject only to any applicable limitations set out in the Plan, the number of Shares or other value to be covered by any Award to be granted under the Plan shall be as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company is authorized to grant Awards (other than awards pursuant to Article VIII) as inducements to hire prospective Employees who will not be officers of the Company or any Affiliate and subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act but such awards shall not exceed an amount determined by the Committee. On an annual basis, the Committee also may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company the ability to grant Awards (other than Awards pursuant to Article VIII) to eligible persons who are not officers or Directors of the Company or any Affiliate and subject to the provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
4.2 Dedicated Shares; Award Limitations.
(a) The aggregate number of Shares with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan is 17,900,000 (the “Plan Share Limit”). The Shares that are available for issuance under the Plan may be issued pursuant to any form of Award authorized under the Plan.
(b) Shares that are issued under a Full Value Award shall be counted against the Plan Share Limit as 1.87 Shares for every one Share so issued. Shares that are issued under any form of Award other than a Full Value Award shall be counted against the Plan Share Limit as one Share for every one Share so issued.
(c) For purposes of this Section 4.2, Shares that are withheld from payment of an Award to satisfy tax obligations with respect to the Award, will be treated as Shares that have been issued under the Plan. If Shares are tendered in payment of an Option Price of an Option, such Shares will not increase the Plan Share Limit. If Shares are purchased by the Company using the cash proceeds received by the Company upon the exercise of Options, such Shares will not increase the Plan Share Limit.
(d) To the extent that an Option granted under the Plan is forfeited or expires unexercised, or is settled in cash in lieu of Shares, the number of Shares that were subject to such portion of the Option shall again become available for issuance under the Plan. To the extent that a Full Value Award is forfeited, lapses, expires, or is settled in cash in lieu of Shares, 1.87 multiplied by the number of Shares that were subject to such portion of the Full Value Award shall again become available for issuance under the Plan.
(e) The aggregate number of Shares with respect to which ISOs may be granted under the Plan is 2,500,000.
(f) The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is 500,000. The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Performance Stock Awards may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is 250,000. The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Performance Unit Awards payable in Shares may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is 250,000 . The maximum grant date value of cash with respect to which Performance Unit Awards payable in cash may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year, determined as of the dates of grants of the Performance Unit Awards, is the equivalent value of 250,000 Shares. The limitations set forth in this Section 4.2(f) shall be applied in a manner that is consistent with the provisions of section 162(m) of the Code and the applicable Department of Treasury regulations and other Department of Treasury guidance issued with respect to section 162(m) of the Code.

Appendix B - 10

(g) Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Committee shall not award to Employees more than 5% of the number of Shares subject to the Plan pursuant to Awards with a vesting schedule that provides for full vesting in less than (i) three years in the case of Awards that are not intended to constitute “performance-based” compensation for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code or (ii) one year after the date of grant in the case of Awards that are intended to constitute “performance-based” compensation under section 162(m) of the Code; provided, however, that Awards may vest earlier, as the Committee deems appropriate, upon death, Disability, retirement or an event which constitutes a Change of Control.
(h) Each of the foregoing numerical limits stated in this Section 4.2 shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.5.
4.3  Non-Transferability. Except as specified in the applicable Award Agreement or in a domestic relations court order, an Award shall not be transferable by the Holder (whether for consideration or otherwise) other than by will or under the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable, during the Holder’s lifetime, only by him or her. Any attempted assignment of an Award in violation of this Section 4.3 shall be null and void. In the discretion of the Committee, any attempt to transfer an Award other than under the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement may terminate the Award. No ISO granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, all ISOs granted to an Employee under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by the Employee, and after that time, by the Employee’s heirs or estate.
4.4  Requirements of Law. The Company shall not be required to sell or issue any Shares under any Award if issuing those Shares would constitute or result in a violation by the Holder or the Company of any provision of any law, statute or regulation of any governmental authority. Specifically, in connection with any applicable statute or regulation relating to the registration of securities, upon exercise of any Option or pursuant to any other Award, the Company shall not be required to issue any Shares unless the Committee has received evidence satisfactory to it to the effect that the Holder will not transfer the Shares except in accordance with applicable law, including receipt of an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company to the effect that any proposed transfer complies with applicable law. The determination by the Committee on this matter shall be final, binding and conclusive. The Company may, but shall in no event be obligated to, register any Shares covered by the Plan pursuant to applicable securities laws of any country or any political subdivision. In the event the Shares issuable on exercise of an Option or pursuant to any other Award are not registered, the Company may imprint on the certificate evidencing the Shares any legend that counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law, or, should the Shares be represented by book or electronic entry rather than a certificate, the Company may take such steps to restrict transfer of the Shares as counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law. The Company shall not be obligated to take any other affirmative action in order to cause or enable the exercise of an Option or any other Award, or the issuance of Shares pursuant thereto, to comply with any law or regulation of any governmental authority.
4.5 Changes in the Company’s Capital Structure.
(a) The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the Company’s capital structure or its business, any merger or consolidation of the Company, any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference shares ahead of or affecting the Stock or Stock rights, the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business or any other corporate act or proceeding, whether of a similar character or otherwise.
(b) If the Company shall effect a subdivision or consolidation of Stock or other capital readjustment, the payment of a Stock dividend, or other increase or reduction of the number of shares of Stock outstanding, without receiving compensation therefor in money, services or property, then (1) the number, class or series and per share price of Stock subject to outstanding Options or other Awards under the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted (subject to the restriction in Sections 4.11 and 11.1 prohibiting repricing without

Appendix B - 11

stockholder approval) in such a manner as to entitle a Holder to receive upon exercise of an Option or other Award, for the same aggregate cash consideration, the equivalent total number and class or series of Stock the Holder would have received had the Holder exercised his or her Option or other Award in full immediately prior to the event requiring the adjustment, and (2) the number and class or series of Stock then reserved to be issued under the Plan shall be adjusted by substituting for the total number and class or series of Stock then reserved that number and class or series of Stock that would have been received by the owner of an equal number of outstanding shares of each class or series of Stock as the result of the event requiring the adjustment.
(c) If while unexercised Options or other Awards remain outstanding under the Plan (1) the Company shall not be the surviving entity in any merger, consolidation or other reorganization (or survives only as a subsidiary of an entity other than an entity that was wholly-owned by the Company immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or other reorganization), (2) the Company sells, leases or exchanges or agrees to sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its assets to any other person or entity (other than an entity wholly-owned by the Company), (3) the Company is to be dissolved or (4) the Company is a party to any other corporate transaction (as defined under section 424(a) of the Code and applicable Department of Treasury regulations) that is not described in clauses (1), (2) or (3) of this sentence (each such event is referred to herein as a “Corporate Change”), then, except as otherwise provided in Article XII, an Award Agreement or another agreement between the Holder and the Company (provided that such exceptions shall not apply in the case of a reincorporation merger or conversion), or as a result of the Committee’s effectuation of one or more of the alternatives described below, there shall be no acceleration of the time at which any Award then outstanding may be exercised, and no later than ten days after the approval by the stockholders of the Company of such Corporate Change, the Committee, acting in its sole and absolute discretion without the consent or approval of any Holder, shall act to effect one or more of the following alternatives, which may vary among individual Holders and which may vary among Awards held by any individual Holder (provided that, with respect to a reincorporation merger or conversion in which Holders of the Company’s ordinary shares will receive the a percentage of shares of the successor corporation, none of such alternatives shall apply and, without Committee action, each Award shall automatically convert into a similar award of the successor corporation exercisable for the same percentage of ordinary shares of the successor as the Award was exercisable for Shares:
(1) accelerate the time at which some or all of the Awards then outstanding may be exercised so that such Awards may be exercised in full for a limited period of time on or before a specified date (before or after such Corporate Change) fixed by the Committee, after which specified date all such Awards that remain unexercised and all rights of Holders thereunder shall terminate;
(2) require the mandatory surrender to the Company by all or selected Holders of some or all of the then outstanding Awards held by such Holders (irrespective of whether such Awards are then exercisable under the provisions of the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement evidencing such Award) as of a date, before or after such Corporate Change, specified by the Committee, in which event the Committee shall thereupon cancel such Award and the Company shall pay to each such Holder an amount of cash per Share equal to the excess, if any, of the per Share price offered to stockholders of the Company in connection with such Corporate Change over the exercise prices under such Award for such Shares;
(3) with respect to all or selected Holders, have some or all of their then outstanding Awards (whether vested or unvested) assumed or have a new award of a similar nature substituted for some or all of their then outstanding Awards under the Plan (whether vested or unvested) by an entity which is a party to the transaction resulting in such Corporate Change and which is then employing such Holder or which is affiliated or associated with such Holder in the same or a substantially similar manner as the Company prior to the Corporate Change, or a parent or subsidiary of such entity, provided that (A) such assumption or substitution is on a basis where the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the Stock subject to the Award immediately after the assumption or substitution over the aggregate exercise price of such Stock is equal to the excess of the aggregate fair market value of all Stock subject to the Award immediately before such assumption or substitution over the aggregate exercise price of such Stock, and

Appendix B - 12

(B) the assumed rights under such existing Award or the substituted rights under such new Award, as the case may be, will have the same terms and conditions as the rights under the existing Award assumed or substituted for, as the case may be;
(4) provide that the number and class or series of Stock covered by an Award (whether vested or unvested) theretofore granted shall be adjusted so that such Award when exercised shall thereafter cover the number and class or series of Stock or other securities or property (including, without limitation, cash) to which the Holder would have been entitled pursuant to the terms of the agreement or plan relating to such Corporate Change if, immediately prior to such Corporate Change, the Holder had been the holder of record of the number of Shares then covered by such Award; or
(5) make such adjustments to Awards then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate to reflect such Corporate Change (provided, however, that the Committee may determine in its sole and absolute discretion that no such adjustment is necessary).
In effecting one or more of the alternatives set out in paragraphs (3), (4) or (5) immediately above, and except as otherwise may be provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion and without the consent or approval of any Holder, may accelerate the time at which some or all Awards then outstanding may be exercised.
(d) In the event of changes in the outstanding Stock by reason of recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, conversion, combinations, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization occurring after the date of the grant of any Award and not otherwise provided for by this Section 4.5, any outstanding Award and any Award Agreement evidencing such Award shall be subject to adjustment by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion as to the number and price of Stock or other consideration subject to such Award. In the event of any such change in the outstanding Stock, the aggregate number of Shares available under the Plan may be appropriately adjusted by the Committee, whose determination shall be conclusive.
(e) After a merger of one or more corporations into the Company or after a consolidation of the Company and one or more corporations in which the Company shall be the surviving corporation, each Holder shall be entitled to have his Restricted Stock appropriately adjusted based on the manner in which the Shares were adjusted under the terms of the agreement of merger or consolidation.
(f) The issuance by the Company of stock of any class or series, or securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, stock of any class or series, for cash or property, or for labor or services either upon direct sale or upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe for them, or upon conversion or exchange of stock or obligations of the Company convertible into, or exchangeable for, stock or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason of such issuance shall be made with respect to, the number, class or series, or price of Shares then subject to outstanding Options or other Awards.
4.6 Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code. No Holder shall exercise the election permitted under section 83(b) of the Code with respect to any Award without the prior written approval of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Any Holder who makes an election under section 83(b) of the Code with respect to any Award without the prior written approval of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company may, in the discretion of the Committee, forfeit any or all Awards granted to him or her under the Plan.
4.7  Forfeiture for Cause. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or an Award Agreement, if the Committee finds by a majority vote that a Holder, before or after his Termination of Employment or severance of affiliation relationship with the Company and all Affiliates, (a) committed fraud, embezzlement, theft, felony or an act of dishonesty in the course of his employment by or affiliation with the Company or an Affiliate which conduct damaged the Company or an Affiliate, (b) disclosed trade secrets of the Company or an Affiliate or (c) violated the terms of any non-competition, non-disclosure or similar agreement with respect to the

Appendix B - 13

Company or any Affiliate to which the Holder is a party, then as of the date the Committee makes its finding some or all Awards awarded to the Holder (including vested Awards that have been exercised, vested Awards that have not been exercised and Awards that have not yet vested), as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and all net proceeds realized with respect to any such Awards, will be forfeited to the Company on such terms as determined by the Committee. The findings and decision of the Committee with respect to such matter, including those regarding the acts of the Holder and the damage done to the Company, will be final for all purposes. No decision of the Committee, however, will affect the finality of the discharge of the individual by the Company or an Affiliate or severance of the individual’s affiliation with the Company and all Affiliates.
4.8 Forfeiture Events. Without limiting the applicability of Section 4.7 or Section 4.9, the Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Holder’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, Termination of Employment for cause, termination of the Holder’s provision of services to the Company or its Affiliates, violation of material policies of the Company and its Affiliates, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality, or other restrictive covenants that may apply to the Holder, or other conduct by the Holder that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company and its Affiliates.
4.9 Recoupment in Restatement Situations. Without limiting the applicability of Section 4.7 or Section 4.8, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under applicable securities laws, the current or former Holder who was a current or former executive officer of the Company shall forfeit and must repay to the Company any compensation awarded under the Plan to the extent specified in any of the Company’s recoupment policies established or amended (now or in the future) in compliance with the rules and standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission Committee under or in connection with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
4.10 Award Agreements. Each Award shall be embodied in a written Award Agreement that shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Award Agreement shall be signed by an executive officer of the Company, other than the Holder, on behalf of the Company, and may be signed by the Holder to the extent required by the Committee. The Award Agreement may specify the effect of a Change of Control on the Award. The Award Agreement may contain any other provisions that the Committee in its discretion shall deem advisable which are not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Plan.
4.11  Amendments of Award Agreements; Repricing Prohibitions. The terms of any outstanding Award under the Plan may be amended from time to time by the Committee in its discretion in any manner that it deems appropriate and that is consistent with the terms of the Plan. However, no such amendment shall adversely affect in a material manner any right of a Holder without his or her written consent. The Committee may not, without stockholder approval, directly or indirectly lower the exercise price of a previously granted Option. Accordingly, except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination or exchange of shares) the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or to cancel Options in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options without stockholder approval.
4.12  Rights as Stockholder. A Holder shall not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to Stock covered by an Option, an RSU, or a Performance Unit, in each case, payable in Stock, until the date, if any, such Stock is issued by the Company; and, except as otherwise provided in Section 4.5, no adjustment for dividends, or otherwise, shall be made if the record date therefor is prior to the date of issuance of such Stock.
4.13  Issuance of Shares of Stock. Shares, when issued, may be represented by a certificate or by book or electronic entry.

Appendix B - 14

4.14 Restrictions on Stock Received. The Committee may impose such conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares issued pursuant to an Award as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the Holder hold the Shares for a specified period of time.
4.15  Compliance With Section 409A. Awards shall be designed, granted and administered in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Section 409A. The Plan and each Award Agreement under the Plan that is intended to comply the requirements of Section 409A shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. If the Committee determines that an Award, Award Agreement, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction, or any other action or arrangement contemplated by the provisions of the Plan would, if undertaken, cause a Holder to become subject to additional taxes under Section 409A, then unless the Committee specifically provides otherwise, such Award, Award Agreement, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction or other action or arrangement shall not be given effect to the extent it causes such result and the related provisions of the Plan and/or Award Agreement will be deemed modified, or, if necessary, suspended in order to comply with the requirements of Section 409A to the extent determined appropriate by the Committee, in each case without the consent of or notice to the Holder. The exercisability of an Option shall not be extended to the extent that such extension would subject the Holder to additional taxes under Section 409A.
4.16 Source of Shares Deliverable Under Awards. Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares of Stock or of treasury shares of Stock.
4.17 Date of Grant. The date on which an Option is granted shall be the date the Company completes the corporate action constituting an offer of stock for sale to a Holder under the terms and conditions of the Option; provided that such corporate action shall not be considered complete until the date on which the maximum number of Shares that can be purchased under the Option and the minimum Option price are fixed or determinable. If the corporate action contemplates an immediate offer of Stock for sale to a class of individuals, then the date of the granting of an Option is the time or date of that corporate action, if the offer is to be made immediately. If the corporate action contemplates a particular date on which the offer is to be made, then the date of grant is the contemplated date of the offer.
ARTICLE V
OPTIONS
5.1  Authority to Grant Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant Options under the Plan to eligible persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.
5.2 Type of Options Available. Options granted under the Plan may be NSOs or ISOs.
5.3 Option Agreement. Each Option grant under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify (a) whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or an NSO, (b) the Option Price, (c) the duration of the Option, (d) the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, (e) the exercise restrictions applicable to the Option and (f) such other provisions as the Committee shall determine that are not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Plan. Notwithstanding the designation of an Option as an ISO in the applicable Award Agreement for such Option, to the extent the limitations of Section 5.9 of the Plan are exceeded with respect to the Option, the portion of the Option in excess of the limitation shall be treated as a NSO. An Option granted under the Plan may not be granted with any Dividend Equivalents rights.
5.4 Option Price. The price at which Shares may be purchased under an Option (the “Option Price”) shall not be less than 100 percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date the Option is granted. However, in the case of a Ten Percent Stockholder, the Option Price for an ISO shall not be less than 110 percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date

Appendix B - 15

the ISO is granted. Subject to the limitations set forth in the preceding sentences of this Section 5.4, the Committee shall determine the Option Price for each grant of an Option under the Plan.
5.5 Duration of Option. An Option shall not be exercisable after the earlier of (i) the general term of the Option specified in the applicable Award Agreement (which shall not exceed ten years) or (ii) the period of time specified in the applicable Award Agreement that follows the Holder’s Termination of Employment or severance of affiliation relationship with the Company. Unless the applicable Award Agreement specifies a shorter term, in the case of an ISO granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder, the Option shall expire on the fifth anniversary of the date the Option is granted.
5.6 Amount Exercisable. Each Option may be exercised at the time, in the manner and subject to the conditions the Committee specifies in the Award Agreement in its sole discretion.
5.7 Exercise of Option.
(a)  General Method of Exercise. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, Options may be exercised in whole or in part from time to time by the delivery of written notice in the manner designated by the Committee stating (1) that the Holder wishes to exercise such Option on the date such notice is so delivered, (2) the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised and (3) the address to which any certificate representing such Shares should be mailed or delivered. Except in the case of exercise by a third party broker as provided below, in order for the notice to be effective the notice must be accompanied by payment of the Option Price by any combination of the following: (a) cash, certified check, bank draft or postal or express money order for an amount equal to the Option Price under the Option, (b) an election to make a cashless exercise through a registered broker-dealer (if approved in advance by the Committee or an executive officer of the Company) or (c) any other form of payment which is acceptable to the Committee.
(b) Exercise Through Third-Party Broker. The Committee may permit a Holder to elect to pay the Option Price and any applicable tax withholding resulting from such exercise by authorizing a third-party broker to sell all or a portion of the Shares acquired upon exercise of the Option and remit to the Company a sufficient portion of the sale proceeds to pay the Option Price and any applicable tax withholding resulting from such exercise.
5.8  Notification of Disqualifying Disposition. If any Optionee shall make any disposition of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO under the circumstances described in section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such Optionee shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.
5.9  $100,000 Limitation on ISOs. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of Stock with respect to which ISOs first become exercisable by a Holder in any calendar year exceeds $100,000, taking into account both Shares subject to ISOs under the Plan and Stock subject to ISOs under all other plans of the Company, such Options shall be treated as NSOs. For this purpose, the “Fair Market Value” of the Stock subject to Options shall be determined as of the date(s) the Options were awarded. In reducing the number of Options treated as ISOs to meet the $100,000 limit, the most recently granted Options shall be reduced first. To the extent a reduction of simultaneously granted Options is necessary to meet the $100,000 limit, the Committee may, in the manner and to the extent permitted by law, designate which Shares are to be treated as shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO.
ARTICLE VI
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
6.1  Restricted Stock Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may make Awards of Restricted Stock under the Plan to eligible persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting and the transferability restrictions applicable to any Restricted Stock Award shall be determined

Appendix B - 16

by the Committee in its sole discretion. If the Committee imposes vesting or transferability restrictions on a Holder’s rights with respect to Restricted Stock, the Committee may issue such instructions to the Company’s share transfer agent in connection therewith as it deems appropriate. The Committee may also cause the certificate for Shares issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award to be imprinted with any legend which counsel for the Company considers advisable with respect to the restrictions or, should the Shares be represented by book or electronic entry rather than a certificate, the Company may take such steps to restrict transfer of the Shares as counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law.
6.2 Restricted Stock Award Agreement. Each Restricted Stock Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any vesting, transferability restrictions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee may specify.
6.3 Holder’s Rights as Stockholder. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, each recipient of a Restricted Stock Award shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Restricted Stock included in the Restricted Stock Award during the Period of Restriction established for the Restricted Stock Award. Dividends paid with respect to Restricted Stock in cash or property other than Shares or rights to acquire Shares shall be paid to the recipient of the Restricted Stock Award currently. Dividends paid in Shares or rights to acquire Shares shall be added to and become a part of the Restricted Stock. During the Period of Restriction, certificates representing the Restricted Stock shall be registered in the Holder’s name and bear a restrictive legend to the effect that ownership of such Restricted Stock, and the enjoyment of all rights appurtenant thereto, are subject to the restrictions, terms, and conditions provided in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement. Such certificates shall be deposited by the recipient with the Secretary of the Company or such other officer of the Company as may be designated by the Committee, together with all stock powers or other instruments of assignment as may be required by the Company, each endorsed in blank, which will permit transfer to the Company of all or any portion of the Restricted Stock which shall be forfeited in accordance with the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.
ARTICLE VII
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS
7.1  Authority to Grant RSU Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant RSU Awards under the Plan to eligible persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting and the transferability restrictions applicable to any RSU Award shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee shall maintain a bookkeeping ledger account which reflects the number of RSUs credited under the Plan for the benefit of a Holder.
7.2 RSU Award. An RSU Award shall be similar in nature to a Restricted Stock Award except that no Shares are actually transferred to the Holder until a later date specified in the applicable Award Agreement. Each RSU shall have a value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share.
7.3 RSU Award Agreement. Each RSU Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, transferability restrictions, form and time of payment provisions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee may specify.
7.4 No Dividend Equivalents. An Award Agreement for an RSU Award shall not specify that the Holder shall be entitled to the payment of Dividend Equivalents under the Award.
7.5 Form of Payment Under RSU Award. Payment under an RSU Award shall be made in either cash or Shares as specified in the applicable Award Agreement.

Appendix B - 17

7.6 Time of Payment Under RSU Award. A Holder’s payment under an RSU Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable Award Agreement. The Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (1) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of the Fiscal Year in which the RSU Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture or (2) at a time that is permissible under Section 409A.
ARTICLE VIII
PERFORMANCE STOCK AWARDS AND
PERFORMANCE UNIT AWARDS
8.1  Authority to Grant Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards under the Plan to eligible persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting and the transferability restrictions applicable to any Performance Stock Award and Performance Unit Award shall be based upon the attainment of such Performance Goals as the Committee may determine; provided, however, that the performance period for any Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award shall not be less than one year. If the Compensation & Management Development Committee imposes vesting or transferability restrictions on a Holder’s rights with respect to Performance Stock Awards or Performance Unit Awards, the Compensation & Management Development Committee may issue such instructions to the Company’s share transfer agent in connection therewith as it deems appropriate. The Compensation & Management Development Committee may also cause the certificate for Shares issued pursuant to a Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award to be imprinted with any legend which counsel for the Company considers advisable with respect to the restrictions or, should the Shares be represented by book or electronic entry rather than a certificate, the Company may take such steps to restrict transfer of the Shares as counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law.
8.2 Performance Goals. A Performance Goal must be objective such that a third party having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether the goal is met. Such a Performance Goal may be based on one or more business criteria that apply to the Holder, one or more business units of the Company, or the Company as a whole, with reference to one or more of the following: earnings per share, earnings per share growth, total shareholder return, economic value added, cash return on capitalization, increased revenue, revenue ratios (per employee or per customer), net income (before or after taxes), stock price, market share, return on equity, return on assets, return on capital, return on capital compared to cost of capital, return on capital employed, return on invested capital, return on investment, return on sales, operating or profit margins, shareholder value, net cash flow, operating income, earnings before or after interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, cash flow, cash flow from operations, cost reductions or cost savings, cost ratios (per employee or per customer), expense control, sales, proceeds from dispositions, project completion time, budget goals, net cash flow before financing activities, customer growth, total capitalization, debt to total capitalization ratio, credit quality or debt ratings, dividend payout, dividend growth, reserve additions or revisions, economic value added from reserves, reserve replacement ratios, reserve replacement costs, finding and development costs, exploration successes, operational downtime, rig utilization, amount of oil and gas reserves, production volumes or safety results. Goals may also be based on performance relative to a peer group of companies. Unless otherwise stated, such a Performance Goal need not be based upon an increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria). Performance Goals may be determined by including or excluding, in the Compensation & Management Development Committee’s discretion, items that are determined to be extraordinary, unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence, related to the disposal or acquisition of a segment of a business, or related to a change in accounting principal, in each case, based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 225-20, Income Statement, Extraordinary and Unusual Items, and FASB ASC 830-10, Foreign Currency Matters, Overall, or other applicable accounting rules,

Appendix B - 18

or consistent with Company accounting policies and practices in effect on the date the Performance Goal is established. In interpreting Plan provisions applicable to Performance Goals and Performance Stock Awards or Performance Unit Awards, it is intended that the Plan will conform with the standards of section 162(m) of the Code and Treasury Regulations § 1.162-27(e)(2)(i), and the Compensation & Management Development Committee in establishing such goals and interpreting the Plan shall be guided by such provisions. Prior to the payment of any compensation based on the achievement of Performance Goals, the Compensation & Management Development Committee must certify in writing that applicable Performance Goals and any of the material terms thereof were, in fact, satisfied. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Performance Stock or Performance Unit Awards made pursuant to the Plan shall be determined by the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Board.
8.3 Time of Establishment of Performance Goals. With respect to a Covered Employee, a Performance Goal for a particular Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award must be established by the Compensation & Management Development Committee of the Board prior to the earlier to occur of (a) 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to which the Performance Goal relates or (b) the lapse of 25 percent of the period of service, and in any event while the outcome is substantially uncertain.
8.4  Written Agreement. Each Performance Stock Award and Performance Unit Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any vesting, transferability restrictions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Compensation & Management Development Committee may specify.
8.5 Form of Payment Under Performance Unit Award. Payment under a Performance Unit Award shall be made in cash and/or Shares as specified in the Holder’s Award Agreement.
8.6 Time of Payment Under Performance Unit Award. A Holder’s payment under a Performance Unit Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable Award Agreement. The Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of the calendar year in which the Performance Unit Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture or (b) at a time that is permissible under section 409A of the Code.
8.7 Holder’s Rights as Stockholder With Respect to a Performance Stock Award. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreements, each Holder of a Performance Stock Award shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Shares issued to the Holder pursuant to the Award during any period in which such issued Shares are subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer, including without limitation, the right to vote such Shares.
8.8 Increases Prohibited. None of the Compensation & Management Development Committee, the Board or the Company may increase the amount of compensation payable under a Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award. If the time at which a Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award will vest or be paid is accelerated for any reason, the number of Shares subject to, or the amount payable under, the Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award shall be reduced pursuant to Department of Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e)(2)(iii) to reasonably reflect the time value of money.
8.9 Stockholder Approval. No payments of Stock or cash will be made to a Covered Employee pursuant to this Article VIII unless the stockholder approval requirements of Department of Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e)(4) are satisfied.
8.10 No Dividend Equivalents. An Award Agreement for a Performance Unit Award shall not specify that the Holder shall be entitled to the payment of Dividend Equivalents under the Award.
8.11  Dividends. In the case of a Performance Share Award, if the Holder shall be become entitled to the payment of dividends paid in Shares or rights to acquire Shares with respect to the Performance Shares, such dividends shall be added to and become a part of the Performance Share Award. Accordingly, such dividends will be subject to the satisfaction of the same performance conditions as apply to the Performance Shares.

Appendix B - 19

ARTICLE IX
SUBSTITUTION AWARDS
Awards may be granted under the Plan from time to time in substitution for stock options and other awards held by employees and directors of other entities who are about to become Employees or affiliated with the Company or any of its Affiliates, or whose employer or corporation with respect to which it provides services is about to become an Affiliate as the result of a merger or consolidation of the Company with another corporation, or the acquisition by the Company of substantially all the assets of another corporation, or the acquisition by the Company of at least fifty percent (50%) of the issued and outstanding stock of another corporation as the result of which such other corporation will become a subsidiary of the Company. The terms and conditions of the substitute Awards so granted may vary from the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan to such extent as the Board at the time of grant may deem appropriate to conform, in whole or in part, to the provisions of the award in substitution for which they are granted. The repricing prohibitions of Sections 4.11 and 11.1 shall apply to substitution awards granted pursuant to this Article IX.
ARTICLE X
ADMINISTRATION
10.1  Awards. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee or, in the absence of the Committee or in the case of awards issued to Directors, the Plan shall be administered by the Board. The members of the Committee (that is not itself the Board) shall serve at the discretion of the Board. The Committee shall have full and exclusive power and authority to administer the Plan and to take all actions that the Plan expressly contemplates or are necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the Plan with respect to Awards granted under the Plan.
10.2  Authority of the Committee. The Committee shall have full and exclusive power to interpret and apply the terms and provisions of the Plan and Awards made under the Plan, and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for implementing the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary or proper, all of which powers shall be exercised in the best interests of the Company and in keeping with the objectives of the Plan. A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the vote of a majority of those members present at any meeting shall decide any question brought before that meeting. Any decision or determination reduced to writing and signed by a majority of the members shall be as effective as if it had been made by a majority vote at a meeting properly called and held. All questions of interpretation and application of the Plan, or as to Awards granted under the Plan, shall be subject to the determination, which shall be final and binding, of a majority of the whole Committee. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any act or omission of any other member of the Committee or for any act or omission on his own part, including but not limited to the exercise of any power or discretion given to him under the Plan, except those resulting from his own gross negligence or willful misconduct. In carrying out its authority under the Plan, the Committee shall have full and final authority and discretion, including but not limited to the following rights, powers and authorities to (a) determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which Awards will be made; (b) determine the number and exercise price of Shares covered in each Award subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan (including, but not limited to, the provisions of Sections 4.11 and 11.1 which prohibit repricing without stockholder approval); (c) determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each Award, which need not be identical and need not match the default terms set forth in the Plan; (d) accelerate the time at which any outstanding Award will vest; (e) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to administration of the Plan; and (f) make all other determinations and take all other actions deemed necessary, appropriate or advisable for the proper administration of the Plan.
The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or in any Award to a Holder in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems necessary or desirable to further the Plan’s objectives. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. As permitted by law and the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee may delegate its authority as identified in this Section 10.2. The

Appendix B - 20

Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, agents, and other persons, any of whom may be an Employee, and the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Board shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions, or valuations of any such persons.
10.3 Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee or the Board, as the case may be, pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Committee or the Board, as the case may be, shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including the Company, its stockholders, Holders and the estates and beneficiaries of Holders.
10.4 No Liability. Under no circumstances shall the Company, the Board or the Committee incur liability for any indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages (including lost profits) of any form incurred by any person, whether or not foreseeable and regardless of the form of the act in which such a claim may be brought, with respect to the Plan or the Company’s, the Committee’s or the Board’s roles in connection with the Plan.
ARTICLE XI
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN
11.1  Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination. Subject to Section 11.2, the Board may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan and the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate any Award Agreement in whole or in part; provided, however, no amendment of the Plan shall be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by applicable law or stock exchange rules. Further, without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders, the Committee shall not directly or indirectly lower the Option Price of a previously granted Option. Accordingly, except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination or exchange of shares) the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or to cancel Options in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options without stockholder approval.
11.2 Awards Previously Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no termination, amendment, suspension, or modification of the Plan or an Award Agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Plan, without the written consent of the Holder holding such Award.
ARTICLE XII
ACCELERATION OF VESTING FOR CERTAIN AWARDS
UPON A CHANGE OF CONTROL
Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, except to the extent expressly provided otherwise in an Award Agreement, in the event of an occurrence of a Change of Control all then outstanding Options, Restricted Stock Awards and Performance Stock Awards granted under the Plan shall become fully vested, and exercisable and all substantial risk of forfeiture restrictions applicable thereto shall lapse. The effect, if any, of a Change of Control upon any other Award granted under the Plan shall be determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable Award Agreement issued by the Committee that are applicable to the Award.
ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS
13.1  Unfunded Plan/No Establishment of a Trust Fund. Holders shall have no right, title, or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company or any of its Affiliates may make to aid in meeting obligations under the Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship

Appendix B - 21

between the Company and any Holder, beneficiary, legal representative, or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company under the Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company. All payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts, except as expressly set forth in the Plan. No property shall be set aside nor shall a trust fund of any kind be established to secure the rights of any Holder under the Plan. The Plan is not intended to be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
13.2 No Employment Obligation. The granting of any Award shall not constitute an employment contract, express or implied, nor impose upon the Company or any Affiliate any obligation to employ or continue to employ, or utilize the services of, any Holder. The right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate the employment of, or provision of services by, any person shall not be diminished or affected by reason of the fact that an Award has been granted to him, and nothing in the Plan or an Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or its Affiliates to terminate any Holder’s employment or provision of services to the Company at any time or for any reason not prohibited by law.
13.3 Tax Withholding. The Company or any Affiliate shall be entitled to deduct from other compensation payable to each Holder any sums required by federal, state or local tax law to be withheld with respect to the vesting or exercise of an Award or lapse of restrictions on an Award. In the alternative, the Company may require the Holder (or other person validly exercising the Award) to pay such sums for taxes directly to the Company or any Affiliate in cash or by check within one day after the date of vesting, exercise or lapse of restrictions. In the discretion of the Committee, the Company may reduce the number of Shares issued to the Holder upon such Holder’s exercise of an Option to satisfy the tax withholding obligations of the Company or an Affiliate; provided that the Fair Market Value of the Shares held back shall not exceed the Company’s or the Affiliate’s Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation. The Committee may, in its discretion, satisfy any Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation arising upon the vesting of an Award by delivering to the Holder a reduced number of Shares in the manner specified herein. In the discretion of the Committee, at the time of vesting of shares under the Award, the Company may (a) calculate the amount of the Company’s or an Affiliate’s Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation on the assumption that all such Shares vested under the Award are made available for delivery, (b) reduce the number of such Shares made available for delivery so that the Fair Market Value of the Shares withheld on the vesting date approximates the Company’s or an Affiliate’s Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation and (c) in lieu of the withheld Shares, remit cash to the United States Treasury and/or other applicable governmental authorities, on behalf of the Holder, in the amount of the Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation. The Company shall withhold only whole Shares to satisfy its Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation. Where the Fair Market Value of the withheld Shares does not equal the amount of the Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation, the Company shall withhold Shares with a Fair Market Value slightly less than the amount of the Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation and the Holder must satisfy the remaining minimum withholding obligation in some other manner permitted under this Section 13.3. The withheld Shares not made available for delivery by the Company shall be retained as treasury shares or will be cancelled and the Holder’s right, title and interest in such Shares shall terminate. The Company shall have no obligation upon vesting or exercise of any Award or lapse of restrictions on an Award until the Company or an Affiliate has received payment sufficient to cover the Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Obligation with respect to that vesting, exercise or lapse of restrictions. Neither the Company nor any Affiliate shall be obligated to advise a Holder of the existence of the tax or the amount which it will be required to withhold.
13.4 Indemnification of the Committee. The Company shall indemnify each present and future member of the Committee against, and each member of the Committee shall be entitled without further action on his or her part to indemnity from the Company for, all expenses (including attorney’s fees, the amount of judgments and the amount of approved settlements made with a view to the curtailment of costs of litigation, other than amounts paid to the Company itself) reasonably incurred by such member in connection

Appendix B - 22

with or arising out of any action, suit or proceeding in which such member may be involved by reason of such member being or having been a member of the Committee, whether or not he or she continues to be a member of the Committee at the time of incurring the expenses, including, without limitation, matters as to which such member shall be finally adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding to have been negligent in the performance of such member’s duty as a member of the Committee. However, this indemnity shall not include any expenses incurred by any member of the Committee in respect of matters as to which such member shall be finally adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding to have been guilty of gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duty as a member of the Committee. In addition, no right of indemnification under the Plan shall be available to or enforceable by any member of the Committee unless, within 60 days after institution of any action, suit or proceeding, such member shall have offered the Company, in writing, the opportunity to handle and defend same at its own expense. This right of indemnification shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors or administrators of each member of the Committee and shall be in addition to all other rights to which a member of the Committee may be entitled as a matter of law, contract or otherwise. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that any payment made pursuant to this Section 13.4 is not exempt from section 409A of the Code and Department of Treasury regulations issued thereunder pursuant to the application of Department of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(10) or other applicable exemption (a “409A Payment”) the following provisions of this Section 13.4 shall apply with respect to such 409A Payment. The Company shall make a 409A Payment due under this Section 13.4 by the last day of the taxable year of the Committee member following the taxable year in which the applicable legal fees and expenses were incurred. The legal fees or expenses that are subject to reimbursement pursuant to this Section 13.4 shall not be limited as a result of when the fees or expenses are incurred. The amounts of legal fees or expenses that are eligible for reimbursement pursuant to this Section 13.4 during a given taxable year of the Committee member shall not affect the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement in any other taxable year. The right to reimbursement pursuant to this Section 13.4 is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.
13.5 Gender and Number. If the context requires, words of one gender when used in the Plan shall include the other and words used in the singular or plural shall include the other.
13.6 Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
13.7  Headings. Headings of Articles and Sections are included for convenience of reference only and do not constitute part of the Plan and shall not be used in construing the terms and provisions of the Plan.
13.8 Other Compensation Plans. The adoption of the Plan shall not affect any other option, incentive or other compensation or benefit plans in effect for the Company or any Affiliate, nor shall the Plan preclude the Company from establishing any other forms of incentive compensation arrangements for Employees or Directors.
13.9 Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under the Plan nor Shares or cash paid pursuant to such Awards, may be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any person under the Company’s or any Affiliate’s retirement plans (both qualified and non-qualified) or welfare benefit plans unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall be taken into account in computing a participant’s benefit.
13.10 Other Awards. The grant of an Award shall not confer upon the Holder the right to receive any future or other Awards under the Plan, whether or not Awards may be granted to similarly situated Holders, or the right to receive future Awards upon the same terms or conditions as previously granted.
13.11  Successors. All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company, or a merger, consolidation, or other transaction.

Appendix B - 23

13.12 Law Limitations/Governmental Approvals. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
13.13  Delivery of Title. The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for Shares issued under the Plan prior to (a) obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable; and (b) completion of any registration or other qualification of the Stock under any applicable national or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable.
13.14 Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.
13.15 Investment Representations. The Committee may require any person receiving Stock pursuant to an Award under the Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the person is acquiring the Shares for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Stock.
13.16  Persons Residing Outside of the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company or any of its Affiliates operates or has Employees, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to (a) determine which Affiliates shall be covered by the Plan; (b) determine which persons employed outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan; (c) amend or vary the terms and provisions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of any Award granted to persons who reside outside the United States; (d) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable - any subplans and modifications to Plan terms and procedures established under this Section 13.16 by the Committee shall be attached to the Plan document as Appendices; and (e) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain or comply with any necessary local government regulatory exemptions or approvals. Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate the Exchange Act, the Code, any securities law or governing statute or any other applicable law.
13.17 No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, additional Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
13.18  Governing Law. The provisions of the Plan and the rights of all persons claiming thereunder shall be construed, administered and governed under the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of the Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, recipients of an Award under the Plan are deemed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts ofWoodlands, Texas to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to the Plan or any related Award Agreement.77380
(281) 210-5100
www.newfield.com







Appendix B - 24

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

4 WATERWAY  SQUARE PLACE

SUITE 100

THE WOODLANDS, TEXAS 77380

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before theThe Meeting - Go towww.proxyvote.comwww.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 14, 201516, 2016 (other than 401(k) plan participants). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
4 WATERWAY SQUARE PLACE
SUITE 100
THE WOODLANDS, TEXAS 77380

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2016

You may attend and vote during the meeting. Have the information printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until
11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 14, 201516, 2016 (other than 401(k) plan participants). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

DURING THE MEETING - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015.

You may attend and vote during the meeting. Have the information printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
401(K) PLAN PARTICIPANTS

All votes by 401(k) plan participants submitted over the Internet, by phone or by mail must be received by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 13, 2015

15, 2016.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by us in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.


TO VOTE, MARK  BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

E00914-P73737        

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANCOMPANYY

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Proposals 1, 2 , 3, 4, 5A, 5B, 6A and 6B.3.

1.

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
1.

Election of Directors

For

Against 

Abstain

5A.Approval of Material Terms of the Performance Goals for Performance Awards under 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan.

Nominees:

Nominees:

1a.

Lee K. Boothby

o

o

o

1b.

Pamela  J. Gardner

o

o

o

1c. John Randolph Kemp III

5B.

Approval of Material Terms of the Performance Goals and Metrics under 2011 Annual Incentive Plan.

For

Against

Abstain 

1d.

1c.

Steven W. Nance

o

o

o

1e. Thomas G. Ricks

2.

1f. Juanita M. Romans
1g. John W. Schanck6A.Approval of Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase authorized shares of common stock.
1h. J. Terry Strange
2.

Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhousCoopersPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditor for fiscal 2015.2016.

o

o

o

1d.

Roger B. Plank

o

o

o

6B.

Approval of Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase authorized shares of preferred stock.

3.

1e.

Thomas G. Ricks

o

o

o

3.

Advisory vote on named executive officer compensation.

o

o

o

4.

Approval of Second Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company 2011 Omnibus Stock Plan.

1f.

Juanita M. Romans

o

o

o

NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

1g.

John W. Schanck

o

o

o

1h.

J. Terry Strange

o

o

o

1i.

J. Kent Wells

o

o

o

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.

o

Note: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Please sign your name exactly as it appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please add your title as such. When signing as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy must sign. If a signer is a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by duly authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date













Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:


The Notice and Proxy Statement and our 20142015 Annual Report (which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for

the year ended December 31, 2014)2015) are available at at:

www.proxyvote.comhttp://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=63798&p=proxy.










__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

E00915-P73737

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

May 15, 2015

17, 2016

The undersigned stockholder of Newfield Exploration Company (herein, the “Company”) hereby makes, constitutes and appoints Lawrence S. Massaro, JohnTimothy D. MarziottiYang and George W. Fairchild, Jr.,Benjamin J. Paul, and each of them, lawful attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in name, place and stead of the undersigned to vote the number of shares of Company common stock that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at 8:00 a.m. Central Time on May 15, 201517, 2016 via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NFX2015,NFX2016, and at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof, on the matters set forth on the reverse side.

This proxy, when properly executed or submitted over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made but the card is signed, this proxy will be voted FOR items 1, 2 3, 4, 5A, 5B, 6A and 6B3 (other than 401(k) plan participants discussed below). If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the Proxies will vote as recommended by our Board or, if there is no recommendation, in their discretion.


If shares of Company common stock are issued to or held for the account of the undersigned under employee plans and voting rights attach to such shares (any of such plans, a “Voting Plan”), then the undersigned hereby directs the respective fiduciary of each applicable Voting Plan to vote all shares of Company common stock in the undersigned’s name and/or account under such Voting Plan in accordance with the instructions given herein, at the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, on all matters properly coming before the annual meeting, including but not limited to the matters set forth on the reverse side. The plan administrator for the Company’s 401(k) plan will direct the trustee to vote shares as to which no instructions are received in proportion to voting directions received by the trustee from all participants who vote.


This proxy will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware and applicable federal securities laws. The execution of this proxy is not intended to, and does not, revoke any prior proxies or powers of attorney other than the revocation, in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law and applicable federal securities laws, of any proxy previously granted specifically in connection with the voting of the shares subject hereto.


Address Changes/Comments:____________________________________________________________________

Address Changes/Comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side)side.)

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED AND DATED ON REVERSE SIDE